TL;DR
Spivak's Calculus
Michael Spivak's Calculus is frequently mentioned as a top choice for those wanting to delve deeply into mathematics. It's praised for its clear presentation of calculus concepts and its ability to introduce real analysis ideas in an accessible manner [2:5],
[5:3]. The book is often described as having a novel-like flow that makes it enjoyable to read, which is rare among textbooks
[5:11].
Linear Algebra Done Right
Sheldon Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right is another highly recommended book, especially for those seeking a deeper understanding of linear algebra beyond computational tricks [2:10],
[4:8]. It emphasizes conceptual understanding and presents linear algebra in a way that connects to broader mathematical topics.
Understanding Mathematics Beyond Textbooks
For those interested in the cultural aspects and historical context of mathematics, books like Introduction to Mathematical Thinking by Keith Devlin are suggested [3:3]. Additionally, exploring math history books can provide insights into the motivation behind mathematical developments
[3:1].
Concrete Mathematics
Concrete Mathematics by Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, and Oren Patashnik is noted for its engaging style and comprehensive coverage of topics [2:8]. Although initially used in a course setting, many readers find it valuable enough to keep as a reference due to its depth and breadth.
Other Notable Mentions
These books cater to different interests and levels, from rigorous textbooks to more casual reads, providing a wide array of options for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of mathematics.
'Math With Bad Drawings' looks fun. I have not read it yet. Author is Ben Orlin
Yeah I bought this one a few weeks ago. Fun read. Not rigorous at all, but very funny and palatable nonetheless. I’m trying to get my younger brother (who’s failing High School Algebra) to get into math and Algebraic processes, and I’ve been showing him this book every now and then when he visits. It doesn’t work as planned, but at least we’re enjoying the time together; at the very least.
This was my new coffee table book and several of my guests have enjoyed looking through it who are not math people. It really is a great book, his presentation style is unique and fun. I highly recommend it.
I can confirm that this is a really fun book. It's certainly not heavy reading, but it's a nice book to read when you just want to relax.
Ben himself also seems like a cool dude. He gave a talk at my university this semester about the interplay between math and science that everyone seemed to have fun at. It was both funny and super accessible. I'm looking forward to catching his talk at JMM this year.
"Reverse Mathematics: Proofs from the Inside Out" by John Stillwell
https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11143.html
The cover belies the book's contents. It is a very well written introduction to reverse mathematics.
I finished this and Stillwell's Elements of Mathematics recently and they're both great. I really want to work through Mathematics and Its History too.
tu's own an introduction to manifolds is a great introduction to the material needed for his differential geometry book. he is very organized as an author, and so he includes only the necessary material to build off of.
tu's style of exercises tends to be relatively straightforward. some people call his exercises too easy, but i am dumb and believe that first introduction should have exercises that solidify the material in a practical way. so i like his exercises.
Tu's Differential Geometry came out late last year and is a fantastic follow up to his other books in the series. One of the cleanest introductions to the basics of connections and curvature you'll find.
edit: And Lee is redoing his Riemannian geometry book (now called Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds thank god) which is getting released start of next year.
Has anybody got a copy of Quanta's the Prime Number Conspiracy?
I have one! From what I've read so far, it's a compilation of previously written articles by Quanta. It's a fun and digestible read(from the perspective of a first year undergrad).
Definitely "The Mathematics of Chip Firing" by Caroline Klivans. But that may have to do with the fact thay it's the only book that exists on the specific area I'm currently studying (simplicial chip firing), and I get my first ever citation from it.
There's also this one: https://bookstore.ams.org/mbk-114/ which was also published recently.
I will be messaging you on 2020-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to remind you of this link
2 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)
There is currently another bot called u/kzreminderbot that is duplicating the functionality of this bot. Since it replies to the same RemindMe! trigger phrase, you may receive a second message from it with the same reminder. If this is annoying to you, please click this link to send feedback to that bot author and ask him to use a different trigger.
^(Info) | ^(Custom) | ^(Your Reminders) | ^(Feedback) |
---|
I like referring to set theory texts as "the bible", more specifically Hrbacek and Jech just because I was raised on it. I also used to have "The 10 commandments" written on my wall, followed by the 10 axioms of set theory. (Ok, so there's like 7 `core' axioms, but I tossed in some extras like the axiom of foundation to make the word play work).
Linear Algebra Done right by Sheldon Axler.
Sterling K. Berberian's books are super clear.
Oh my god that linear algebra book is FANTASTIC
Linear Algebra Done Wrong is better
After using Spivak as the primary text in Freshman Calculus, I still go back every few years and re-read parts of this book for pleasure.. It presents core Calculus concepts and also introduces basic ideas about real analysis. Is this book well known among Mathematicians? Does anyone know about the Author? He seems to keep a low profile.
Calculus by michael spivak :)
Concrete Mathematics by Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, Oren Patashnik. I dropped the course that used this textbook in the second week, but decided to keep the book.
I think there are parts of it that are actually quite well done, but in a way that makes the whole project worse, because there is reason to like some of it getting students to swallow the whole thing.
I think the worst part about the book (going to the myopia you mention) is the miseducation of a whole generation of students about determinants. Determinants (and the exterior product if we did not choose base vectors) is literally one of the most if not the central object of all of (multi)-linear algebra and connects the field to so many other topics, and by claiming it's unnecessary and unintuitive students who are educated this way are worse than served badly. Sadly the book is a massive success so the damage is quite substantial.
Seems like a lot of fields have this. Kechris's book is widely regarded to be the Bible of descriptive set theory (and I know a few people in the field who refer to the man himself as the area's God).
jeez and I still have ptsd from Jech, it was an enjoyable fling but I was not cut out to be a descriptive set theory guy.
What does that make Eisenbud's Commutative Algebra?
I'm a sophomore physics major in Calc 3 and Linear Algebra right now and while I'm not necessarily struggling in classes doing problems, I keep thinking to myself that I have no idea what's going on. When I felt this way for Physics I got the books "Six Easy Pieces" by Richard Feynman which explain very well what is going on. I'm looking for equivalent books in Mathematics. While I do well in my classes I feel as if once I get out into the world and do research or something I wouldn't be able to participate in any talk of in-depth mathematics because I don't actually understand what I'm doing, why I'm doing it or where it comes from. All I know is how to do it.
So like the title says, I'm looking for a book/course that could help me understand what's really going on in math, thanks in advance!
It sounds to me like you might be looking to know more about the culture of mathematics. Ironically, for this, math textbooks may not be the best place for you to look! The cultural aspects of mathematics are (in my opinion) just as important as the technical aspects, and much of the former can be lost in expository texts. This includes such things as motivation for a topic, or perhaps the original approach taken by the person who first popularized a concept or topic.
My recommendation is to pick up a math history book: This might help glean some insight into why people worked on the topics they did in the first place. One of my personal favorite is the book about Srinivasa Ramanujan, titled The Man Who Knew Infinity.
If I have to recommend an actual math textbook, I will say to work through Baby Rudin. It's basically Calc 1–3 with tons of proofs and rigor, plus some extra stuff you've probably not seen yet. If you can understand that book and do even some of the exercises, it will give you a strong foothold in getting a "big picture" view of mathematics.
EXACTLY! I do not want a textbook at all, I want to KNOW math not know how to do it. So you are spot on in saying I want to know the culture, I'll definitely look into getting a math history book. Thanks for the suggestion!
I read an interesting article/perspective on those who "know math" vs those who "solve problems" as two factions of mathematicians. I read it recently, but I can't find it in my browser history. If you're interested in reading it, I'll keep looking for it.
This might be a bit unusual, but I would also recommend Introduction to Mathematical Thinking by Devlin. It starts with history of math and how it evolved from arithmetic to abstract logic. It is a bit basic, but maybe you will give it a try.
While this isn't a book, the youtube account 3Blue1Brown has a calculus playlist with great visuals that can help you understand why stuff works. I'd definitely check it out.
For linear algebra, i heavily recommend you read a book meant for mathematicians, such as serge lang's take on it. (Even 3b1b's series was in a way bounded by the coordinate plane)
I've accidentally picked up a linear algebra book for engineers, and it was not useful at gaining any deeper understanding, only calculative tricks. They were definitely helpful, but it'll only make you hate linear algebra more
Calculus: Early Transcendentals is the only cal book I can recommend because it’s the only one I’ve read.
Prof Leonard on YouTube explains concepts very clearly if you’d like to try that. Really gets to what is going on behind the calculations
I’ll second u/amdpox’s recommendation of Understanding Analysis. And you can get it for free right now because it’s one of the free textbooks that the publisher is offering during the pandemic!
Is there any book you could recommend for this? I’m in almost the same boat as OP, just finishing Calc II instead of III (and while I don’t necessarily feel lost in any way, I would really like to gain a deeper understanding of the content).
There are a lot of good picks. If you just want a surface level introduction, Abbott's Understanding Analysis is a solid book. For a deeper treatment, look at Tao's analysis. If you're feeling masochistic, try Rudin.
for an intro (first and part of second semester course) "Real analysis" by jay cummings is superb
Also gilbert strangs book is literally the best linear algebra book there is. I read it for fun. Seriously good.
Charles Pinter's A Book of Abstract Algebra.
The math I knew was limited to what a CS sophomore would have taken (calculus + a discrete math course). When I picked up Pinter's book, it was at the right level for me and written in an inviting way. The topics were completely new to me, so nearly every page kept me glued to the book. This book single-handedly introduced me to and made me love and pursue the world of (abstract) algebra.
Same. This was the first pure math book I studied on my own, the summer before my first abstract algebra course. I couldn’t get enough of it. The style is much more entertaining than many introductory math books, many examples are introduced in the exercises which makes them really fun to do. I would recommend this book to anybody looking to get started in pure math study!
This was my course text for the first really abstract class I had ever taken. It was a rough transition, and I found myself going through the 5 stages of grief, mourning the death of my love for my major.^^[1] After a while, though, this book won me over and I started thinking of abstract algebra as some arcane thing that would be taught at Hogwarts. My group theory class became my daily trip to the wizarding world. I ended up getting an A in the course and look back on it very fondly, and Pinter's text had a lot to do with this radical attitude adjustment.
^^[1] This wailing and gnashing of teeth is exaggerated to be cute. In a lot of ways this shook out to be one of my favorite terms.
Not exactly a textbook, but the Mathematician’s Lament by Paul Lockhart. I can read it over and over again.
Seconding this. I've also enjoyed Measurement by him, though it's a bit longer.
Spivak's calculus. In depth analysis of all the basic concepts in an amazingly simple way.
The problem sets in that book are amazing.
All of the calculus books by James Stewart... That man had a talent for simplifying mathematics AND making them beautiful and interesting. I highly recommend them!
That's a fact. Sterward books are pretty simple to read and understand. The examples it shows are really practical, and the excercises too. In my case I used "Calculus: Early Trascendentals" to learn multi-variable calculus for my math III course in college. Also, there is a database in the internet that has every single excercise resolved, that is useful when you don't understand any of them. Strongly recommended.
None, but LADR comes close.
[Edit] Linear Algebra Done Right by Axler.
I wish. Axler published solutions for the 2nd edition but none yet for the 3rd.
I know that I should have confidence in my own proofs but as my first attempt at proof based math it would help to have proofs known to be correct and complete to compare to.
Springer is giving free access to download this book right now...
Do you have any book(s) that, because of its quality, informational value, or personal significance, you keep coming back to even as you progress through different areas of math?
That's something I only discovered recently. I've downloaded all of them.
I used Lie Groups: Beyond an Introduction as a Ph.D. student, and Basic Algebra and Advanced Algebra have been go-to texts since I was given them.
I haven't read his analysis books, but I'd suspect that they're similarly excellent.
Michael Spivak's Calculus. I have still not found a mathematics book with such generosity to the reader. The way each chapter flows into the next often gives me the feeling of reading a novel rather than a textbook.
I loved that book as a student but retrospectively think it's just... so prolix, rarely more intuitive than a standard advanced calculus book, etc.
But it does have the real rapport with its reader of a true mathematics text. Perhaps economy of thought isn't everything.
Nobody asked and everyone feels different about different things but i cannot see how is Spivak generous to the reader.
I'm not a math major so maybe there's the issue, but while reading Spivak i had the feeling that he overcomplicates stuff sometimes. Like, i could read along his proofs, but it was impossible for me to grasp the idea behind them.
For me, he motivates the material very well. Take, for example, how he introduces the real numbers. In the first chapter, he explains very carefully how the real numbers are an ordered field, but without overburdening the reader by, for instance, formally introducing fields or sets or whatever (which is what lots of analysis classes do). Then, rather than immediately introducing the least upper bound axiom (which often feels odd and unmotivated to students), he instead discusses the main theorems of introductory real analysis, such as the intermediate value theorem. He then explains what will go wrong if we tried to prove the intermediate value theorem without using the least upper bound axiom (i.e. without using the Dedekind-completeness of R). By this point, the motivation behind introducing the axiom is clear. It is quite an impressive achievement to make the characterisation of R up to isomorphism feel so natural (especially considering that this characterisation is, in reality, not particularly obvious – it was only discovered at the turn of the 20th Century).
I was gifted Knapp's Basic Algebra and Advanced Algebra by a professor who retired. I was also gifted Boas' A Primer on Real Functions by another professor who retired.
I also have my mother's copy of Thomas & Finney's Calculus and Analytic Geometry (5th Edition) from when she was in university.
Papadimitriou's "Computational Complexity". The first book I read from cover to cover during my undergrad (and man, do I love the cover!) And one of the few books that I did fell a sense of discovering the proofs along reading them, nothing felt magic, nothing felt pretentious.
Definitely my favorite textbook author so far. Problems in ISM were a little bit easy, but then I read his Riemannian manifolds book and the problems in that book kicked my ass (though they had a great range of difficulties).
Lee's intro to smooth manifolds never stops being useful for me. Also bleecker's gauge theory and variational principles
Could I use it to teach myself Reimannian geometry if paired with other resources?
I was literally about to comment Less intro to smooth manifolds, that book has ignited a love in me that cant be described by words. Differential Forms my beloved.
Had a professor that let me take a course in stochastic calculus meant for PhD students last semester while I was still just an undergraduate student. After one of the lectures he invited me to his office for lunch and to talk. I said that I was interested in pursuing mathematics academically and he gave me advice on what to do and his own experiences. At the end of the discussion he gifted me “Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes” by Ikeda and Watanabe and a book on SPDE’s and tells me that If I can read and understand them that I would be prepared to pursue a career in mathematics. Since then I’ve read both books, and bought 5 new ones, and stochastic calculus has become my favourite field of mathematics
As the title implies, I’m trying to find a good math book because soon I will be starting my studies in pure math, at least that is what we call it here in Venezuela, in any case, they also talk about geometry, so any advice would be cool, thanks before hand
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/38769
A Course of Pure Mathematics by GH Hardy
E: This is not an easy book so maybe give it a look just to get an overview.
Calculus by Spivak and Linear Algebra Done Right by Axler are what my pure math courses covered in first year.
I was gonna say Calculus by Michael Spivak is simple enough to read right from the start. Probably one of my most favored introductory math books!
That Axler book is goated. Has anyone tried his measure theory book? Any good?
It definitely is. I didn't even know he has a book on measure theory
LADR is the best math book I’ve ever read in any field. Second place goes to Boas’ Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, though that’s obviously not pure math
Google "dec41 notes" and click on the notes for the Number and Sets course (and anything else that interests you)
Thanks! Do you know anywhere else I could find Set Theory notes?
Depends on what kind of set theory are you talking about.
If you're talking about elementary stuff like what is union what is intersection etc, it's in the first two chapters in the Number and Sets notes in the website I mentioned.
If you're talking about proper set theory like ZFC stuff, maybe you'd be interested in reading through the Logic and Set Theory notes in the website I mentioned.
Here are some helpful math textbook resources
I'm sure your program will be dense enough not to leave time for reading additional books.
If you want to prepare as much as possible before starting, you could try to build your intuition based on what you will study.
For example, if you are going to study linear algebra in your first year, then a good visual introduction may help you graps a lot of the ideas before being exposed to the formalisms. The introduction to this book seems appropriate. People also swear by the "essence of linear algebra" videos.
It will be much easier to give a recommendation if we know what you have studied and what you are going to study.
The guy who wrote those notes is one of my close friends. He typed them when he was an undergrad at Cambridge.
Hello, sorry if there are posts about this already but I'm looking for good books to help me with math concepts. Probably need to start around algebra. I don't do well with using Kahn academy other than to supplement learning. I need to rinse and repeat examples. Thanks!
So I did a ton of self-study/relearning of Math after I realized that I really enjoyed pure math but hadn't really paid attention to the basics. As an adult, I found it hard to find material that didn't feel silly and was also engaging.
Here is a rough set of things that I recommend.
Gelfand's Algebra. Just as /u/OompaLoompaAssGlands says, the book has a lot of interesting exercises that are helpful, engaging. It is also designed for self-study so there is no assumption that you are following this with a teacher.
AOPS: Pre-Algebra/Algebra/Intermediate Algebra. Now, I have found these books to be phenomenal in terms of both discovery based learning and also in terms of teaching you how to problem solve. The exercises are hard but have been truly phenomenal in terms of training me to problem solve. I recommend them especially if you wish to learn material while learning how to problem solve.
H. Wu's books Professor Wu writes books designed for teachers that are intended to provide a rigorous take on elementary Math. Now, I only recommend these if you are far more interested in the why. It made sense to me because like I said, I had a sort of a weird path into Math starting by taking a bunch of abstract Math classes where I studied proof techniques, so from that perspective Wu's work was good. The exercises are fairly easy though.
Would you say Gelfand or AOPS is more challenging and oriented around discovery?
Gelfand feels more like a traditional book, i.e. there is a short section introducing a concept and then there are questions and answers. Now, I haven't done every one of those, but I have done quite a lot of them, they are interesting and they are certainly more engaging than say Serge Lang's Basic Math (and both are obviously leagues ahead of Khan academy).
However, AOPS is very much the kind of book(s) that you can't just read. There is extremely minimal text that introduces a topic, instead you are given simple exercises that are related to previous topics and through those you are introduced a topic. So in that sense, you discover almost naturally why a certain thing happens. So Gelfand is more show and then you receive and AOPS is more you discover it. The latter is more exciting for me, because there is a feeling of 'owning the discovery'. I am biased in that the only Math classes that I have enjoyed have been the 'inquiry based learning' or 'discovery based learning' types. So this works very well for me.
I'd say some of the problems in AOPS are roughly comparable to Gelfand, especially in Pre-Algebra and bits of Algebra. Mainly because well you gotta do drills and there is only a degree to which you can amp up the sophistication there. However one place where things are quite amazing are the Challenge Problems. I guess a lot of them are from American Competitions for students (Mathcounts, AMC etc) but I never did those as a kid, they are so much fun! Fairly simple concepts that you just studied get used in such profound ways, that part is very enjoyable. The best bit about AOPS that I like is that there are solutions available for all of the problems in the solutions book, so that gives you additional insight. There are unofficial solutions for a lot of the Gelfand problems so that helps mitigate the issue. Oh, just to give a balanced perspective, there is one place where Gelfand emphasizes that I feel like AOPS doesnt: Gelfand has a lot of short exercises on proving things which eventually turn out to be helpful if you intend to do a lot of proof based math.
The Art of Problem Solving (both volume 1 and 2). Amazing books with corresponding solution manuals you can pick up.
Awesome. Thanks!
Gelfand's Algebra was reccomended to me, it starts literally at the most elementary level of basic addition, but asks clever questions that require that you fully comprehend those essential basic concepts before moving on.
Okay, thanks.
A group of things I sometimes share, a list of free resources
http://www.sumizdat.org/arith_6_8.pdf A fine basic explanation of mathematical abstraction
The Importance of Mathematics 8 Parts from this thought provoking post.
https://archive.uea.ac.uk/jtm/contents.htm/
https://mathstrek.blog/contents/
http://whyslopes.com/index.php/4020Volume_1_Elements_of_Reason/
http://whyslopes.com/index.php/5020Algebra_Starter_Lessons/
http://betterexplained.com/articles/category/math/
http://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1rsqkz/eli5what_is_math_and_why_does_it_work/
http://www.youtube.com/user/mathinreallife
http://www.whenwilliusemath.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_mathematics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_mathematics
Two sites worth digging around on http://math.stackexchange.com , matheducators.stackexchange.com
And some deeper thoughts on the subject here http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/philosophy-of-mathematics
> Understanding Math
Charles Ward is the best. I have spent so many hours on this website and it has been super helpful.
> The Craft of Word Problems
I think your link is broken. Is this the right link?
Wow. Thank you!
Precalculus by blitzer
Also Linear Algebra by Hannity, and Calculus by Maddow
I am a student in the first year of engineering and I like to dive some more into the wonders of math. But there are so many to pick from I don't know where to start.
Great YouTube channels like 3blue1brown are also welcome!
I found Charles Pinters a book of abstract algebra to be fun, also either Janich or Munkres topology!
I second Pinter. I had a prof who tried to teach it from a free online textbook which was pretty terrible and the Pinter book was a wonderful substitute. It changed the class from being boring to being really fun.
Pinter was fun.
This makes me really want to go through my copy of Pinter this summer but im currently going through Tao's analysis and don't want to stop
In some respects I have a very strong love of Oyestein Ore's "Number Theory and Its History." I read this book in high school (it is highly readable in general with no background requirement) and it is a major influence on what made me become a number theorist.
Concrete Mathematics by Graham, Knuth, and Patashnik is pretty amazing.
Seconded, awesome book
Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos, by Steven Strogatz. It’s informative, interesting, and clearly written with excellent analogies and applications.
This by far, hands down. Fantastic communication of very important ideas. Honestly love Strogatz so much.
Sure. I don't think it is the best introductory number theory textbook out there for any audience. Some of its advantages are precisely because it assumes so little background that a high school student can read it. But it doesn't cover a lot of things we'd expect a general basic number theory course to cover; for example, there's basically no coverage of quadratic extensions, nor does it cover quadratic reciprocity, and the coverage of continued fractions is not great either.
In that regard, it is a bit unlike say Hardy and Wright which I mostly read a few years later while also in high school, but consult regularly as a reference work. I don't think I'd ever use Ore's book as a reference that way.
But if one has no exposure or minimal exposure to number theory, it is absolutely a great place to start.
You need some background (differential equations [and therefore calculus and linear algebra]), but that's the kind of stuff you'll learn as an engineering student. He gives you a full overview/introduction, so you don't need any background in dynamical systems.
It's more pop-sciencey, but Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid is what made me pursue a career in mathematics. It's a beautiful book that is just perfect in every single way and covers so many topics incredibly insightingly, not to mention humorously. If I had to rate all the books that I've ever read on a 10-point scale, then the books I didn't like would be 1, books that I did like would be 2, and GEB would be 10.
Hello, I'm a high school student and I would like to polish up my skills a bit more, and try to understand shapes better and improve on it. I was wondering if there are any suggestions for books that could help me do this.
Flatland ... without any doubt :)
Thank you! Will look into it. :D
Serge Lang and Murrow's Geometry is in my opinion best, especially for a beginner. The other recommendations seem to skip over that qualifier you posted. Coxeter is absolutely not a beginner's book and though Gelfand's is aimed at school kids, it's also not a beginners book. The Art of Problem Solving is aimed at the more advanced math student, so you might like it, but it is also not really aimed at students that might struggle with math, in fact the whole series is dedicated to math proficiency that will lead to math competitions. Lang's book is approachable to a beginner and meant to be a working highschool math book, and I think because Lang is actually a very good mathematician and teacher of math, his book will be precise and clear to help you understand, plus he goes further in this respect than any normal school math book.
Ah I see, thank you for your insight. Any suggestions for books after this one?
More geometry? You could read the original Euclid, or the more modern attempt with Hilbert. If you prefer something more specific according to your interests a good place to at least peruse through are Springer published books, such as by Stillwell or Harthorne, if I remember the name right. Cambridge has a very comprehensive geometry book by Brannan.
After reading your regular geometry book, you could try Gelfand's Geometry(Superb and for motivated high-schoolers). For a demanding and harcore oldie, try Kiselev's Geometry. Also, Lang & Murrow High-School Geometry is very good modern book. If you're interested in a bird-view of the several interesting branches in geometry, Coxeter's Introduction to Geometry is excellent. Good Luck!
Thank you! I’ll check all those out, my regular textbooks don’t really go much into depth and covers only a few topics. So these would be of great help. :D
Seconding Lang and Murrow, I preferred it to Gelfand
Thank you! :D
The Art of Problem Solving's book Introduction to Geometry is what you are looking for. Here's the link.
Thank you! Will check that out. :D
Lol that's way to advanced
I really just wanna get stuck into a great maths book. Preferably not a textbook, and I really don’t mind what area of maths it’s concerned with. I read the joy of x ages ago and enjoyed it, godel Escher Bach ( kinda a maths book) and it’s one of my favourites of all time. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
It sounds like you want a pop book about math, not an actual math book, so I'll recommend A History of Pi and Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula.
a history of pi is hilarious. "e: the story of a number" is also pretty good.
Proofs from the Book (named after the erdos concept) is a great collection of beautiful proofs.
The man who loved only numbers (Erdos biography) is also great if you're looking for a book about math, rather than a math book.
The Housekeeper and the Professor. Fiction, but very beautiful.
I second Erdos' biography! It's what made me choose mathematics :)
"What Is Mathematics?" by Richard Courant. It's getting a bit forgotten now, but in the last century it was probably the most influential popular math book. It's a bit dense in terms of content, but since you've liked GEB, maybe that's the kind of thing that would be up your alley. For example it's discussing mathematical induction at like page 30, just after the basic arithmetics.
Let’s acknowledge Herbert Robbins and his contribution to that book…
As far as pop maths books go, everything written by Simon Singh is pure gold.
A book that was really influential on me when I was younger was "e: The Story of a Number" by Eli Maor. It tells the history of the discovery of a lot of very important concepts like logarithms, integrals, hyperbolic trig functions, and of course e, in a lively and engaging way.
best book for learning mathematics?
Key Considerations for Choosing a Mathematics Book:
Level of Understanding: Assess your current level (beginner, intermediate, advanced) to select a book that matches your understanding.
Subject Focus: Determine which area of mathematics you want to learn (algebra, calculus, statistics, etc.) and choose a book that specializes in that topic.
Teaching Style: Look for books that explain concepts clearly and provide plenty of examples and exercises. Some books are more theoretical, while others are more practical.
Supplementary Resources: Consider books that come with additional resources like online exercises, video lectures, or companion websites.
Reviews and Recommendations: Check reviews or ask for recommendations from teachers or peers to find books that have helped others.
Recommended Books:
"Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction" by Timothy Gowers
Great for beginners, this book provides a broad overview of various mathematical concepts in an accessible way.
"Algebra" by Israel M. Gelfand and Alexander Shen
A classic introduction to algebra that emphasizes understanding over rote memorization.
"Calculus" by Michael Spivak
Ideal for those looking for a rigorous introduction to calculus, this book is well-regarded for its clarity and depth.
"The Art of Problem Solving" series by Richard Rusczyk
Excellent for students who want to develop problem-solving skills, particularly for math competitions.
"How to Solve It" by George Pólya
A timeless guide on problem-solving strategies that can be applied across various areas of mathematics.
Recommendation: If you're starting from scratch, I recommend "Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction" for its broad coverage and engaging writing style. For a more focused study, "Algebra" by Gelfand is a fantastic choice that builds a strong foundation.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.