TL;DR The top recommended dog food brands are Purina Pro Plan, Hill's Science Diet, Royal Canin, Iams, and Eukanuba. These brands are backed by scientific research and veterinary standards.
Science-Backed Brands
Several commenters emphasize the importance of choosing dog food brands that are backed by scientific research and meet WSAVA (World Small Animal Veterinary Association) guidelines. The most frequently mentioned brands include Hill's Science Diet, Purina Pro Plan, Royal Canin, Iams, and Eukanuba [1:3]
[5:5]. These brands have been praised for their quality and effectiveness in maintaining dogs' health, energy levels, and coat condition
[1:4]
[4:1].
Specific Formulas for Allergies
For dogs with specific dietary needs or allergies, formulas like Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Salmon are recommended. This formula has helped dogs with chicken allergies and skin issues [2:2]
[2:8]. Hill's Science Diet also offers a sensitive skin and stomach option that has been effective for dogs with digestive issues
[2:9].
Affordability and Availability
Purina One is noted for being an affordable option that still provides good nutrition and keeps dogs healthy and energetic [2:1]. Some users have found deals on Pro Plan, making it more budget-friendly than other premium options
[4:1]. However, some brands like Royal Canin can be quite expensive, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious pet owners
[5:10].
Concerns About Boutique and Grain-Free Diets
There is skepticism about boutique and grain-free diets, with some commenters warning against them due to potential health risks such as heart conditions [5:4]
[2:8]. While some boutique brands market themselves as using "whole ingredients" and "no fillers," these claims are often seen as marketing tactics rather than based on nutritional science
[5:8].
Alternative Options
For those looking for alternatives, Kirkland Costco brand was mentioned as a cheaper yet nutritious option [2:4]. Additionally, Voyager was mentioned for its low copper content, which is important for some dogs
[3:1].
In summary, when selecting a dog food brand, consider the scientific backing, specific dietary needs, affordability, and avoid falling for marketing gimmicks from boutique brands.
I’ve tried a few different dog food brands over the past couple years. Some seemed okay at first, but my dog had reactions. I’m looking for something that actually works long-term good for energy, digestion, coat, and overall health.
I don’t mind spending a bit more if it’s high quality and safe. Just want something my dog will enjoy and thrive on.
If you’ve found a dog food that really worked well for your pup or didn’t, I’d love to hear your experience!
My Aussies are on Fromm gold. The female Aussie tends to have skin/coat/stomach issues and used to be on Hills Science Diet sensitive skin and stomach. I’ve found that Fromm seems to be better for both her and my male Aussie. She’s happier, more active and being a goofball again.
I would only do the 5 backed by decades of science and WSAVA approved. Hill’s Science Diet Purina Pro Plan Royal Canine Iams Eukanuba
My 16.5 year old and 8 year old are doing great on Purina pro plan
I liked that one but my dog ended up having a food allergy and she has a reaction to that. But it's suppose to be good
We're on the salmon flavor sensitive skin and stomach best my old girl is allergic to chicken and beef. It works for us!
We feed Royal Canin
I'm guessing you're from the US cause you didn't specify your location lol dog food brands vary according to the country, we don't know where you're from
I’ve been reading so many mixed opinions online about kibble, wet food, raw diets, etc. It feels overwhelming trying to figure out what’s actually best. For those of you with healthy, happy pups—what food worked for your dog, and what made you stick with it?
Purina Pro Plan. My boy had shown some allergy symptoms whenever he would eat kibble with chicken as its main protein, so I switched him to Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Salmon formula and all the symptoms stopped. He’s been a happy and healthy doggie ever since I made that switch almost 3 years ago.
Lots of those fresh dog food brands have been making dogs very sick with things like pancreatitis (due to being too high in fat) and gastritis (due to contamination with bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria). While there isn’t one in particular that is better or worse, it’s been a problem across the whole fresh dog foods brand spectrum.
I’m not well versed in the raw feeding world, but I do know you do have to ensure they’re getting all the nutrients the dog needs and that usually includes adding supplements to meals to balance the diet to ensure you’re coving all your dogs nutritional bases.
Good luck!
Same here, the large breed version. I switched to it on the recommendation of my vet, and it's been good.
There are zero benefits to raw. Only risks.
Purina One. I stick with it because it’s affordable and my dog is happy, healthy, active and fit. He has great bloodwork, solid poops and lots of energy. Never had any major health issues in his 3 years. He’s also a very healthy weight with a nice coat. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
I am also a Purina fan for the base of their food or “minimum wage”. They get plenty of fun treats and toppers to enrich their diet and they thrive. Purina One is well balanced and I like it for my younger dog! If he needed a vet diet I would go with Purina, their vet diets really helped my older cat live a longer and more comfortable life.
My previous dog got Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin and Stomach salmon and rice. He was half Great Pyrenees, and they’re apparently prone to being sensitive to chicken. Idk, it was the first food he had where he didn’t have to be coaxed to eat.
My current dog gets Purina One, because my finances have changed and I can’t afford the Pro Plan. She’s thriving, though.
Whatever you decide, I would suggest avoiding putting your dog on a grain-free diet unless your vet tells you that your dog has a grain allergy or intolerance. I see one industry-run study that suggests safety, but I am not convinced that a single 20-week study is conclusive. To sum up, there’s been a concern that substituting pulses for grains in dog food plays a role in non-hereditary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Unless your dog has a real, diagnosed medical issue with grains then a diet that includes them is likely safer than one that substitutes peas and other pulses.
my dogs get kirkland costco brand because its about as nutritious as the others and way cheaper
The truth is, dogs are pretty resilient; they can eat a lot of different things and be fairly healthy. I've had small dogs that lived to 16 and 17 on a mix of raw chicken wings for breakfast and Stella and Chewy's raw food (either the wet meaty nuggets or freeze-dried bits) for dinner. I currently have a living 17yo who for part of his life ate that diet, but now eats Wellness CORE canned food with supplements and medication mixed in; he has diseases of age (glaucoma+cataracts, arthritis+IVDD+tracheal collapse, a heart murmur due to stiffening valves) but does not have cancer and his recent annual bloodwork was good. I have a younger large dog who eats a mix of kibbles (Lukullus, Wainwright's, Scrumbles, James Wellbeloved, Wolf of Wilderness, Yarrah) and some cans (Butcher's, Yarrah, Wainwright's) and while she's only two, she seems healthy. My parents have large dogs on a home-cooked diet made of ground meat, broccoli, carrots, and whole grain pasta; they are ages five, two, and eight months, and all seem healthy (I can't say yet if it seems fantastic for longevity or not, as they haven't lived their full lives on this diet so I can't say if they lived long or short for their size). As a child/teen, I had a medium-sized dog who lived to 12 on basic kibble (I don't recall all the brands fed over her life, though I know Iams, Purina, and Pedigree were in the mix). Dogs are resilient; they can live on what amounts to our trash and will thrive when given basically anything better than that. Now, they may thrive more or better or longer on fancier diets, but the truth is that weight is just as important (fat dogs are not healthy) and most dogs will do pretty well on basically any sensible food or mix of foods.
Hills Science sensitive skin and stomach food is the only food I’ve found that my corgi can eat without experiencing itchy skin and diarrhea. He’s been on it for about 3 years and has zero digestive issues and a beautiful healthy coat.
All three of my corgis have had Purina their entire lives.
I think my guy has some food allergies. I’d love if he could eat something more affordable lol
Hi reddit! I’m back lol. I recently posted regarding crate training and pet insurance and received so much helpful feedback! Thank you guys! Mavis is settling in great and her crate comes in the mail today🥳Still doing more research on insurance.
I do need some input on diet though! The shelter gave me a bag of what they fed her and it’s Hills puppy science diet. I’m ok with continuing to buy this for her but I am a bit of a clean eating freak, that being said I want to make sure my pup is getting good quality kibble without spending a fortune and I have no idea if Hills is a good brand. I was thinking about possibly making toppers for her food (beef, brown rice, sweet potato, green beans, bone broth) but if anyone has input on good quality, clean dog food brands let me know! She will be getting a vet check up sometime between now and when she turns 1 so I will ask the vet, but until then I’d love to hear suggestions!
I’m not sure if breed matters but for reference she is a 7 month old doberman/cattle dog mix (with probably some other breeds thrown in there, as she’s pretty small, only 30 pounds)
Let me know, thanks again!
My dog likes Hills
Zulu
Nma
Voyger top notch. Very low copper, no added copper. Be aware of too much copper in dog food. It can be deadly for some and almost was for one of our dogs
Hi! I just wanted to know if y’all can give me some dog kibble recommendations. I want to change my dog food due to Victor being recalled. Are there any healthy option or brand that won’t kill your wallet?
Weruva viva vital pro plan hills and blue r the ones I feed my bois our vet says that these r what help them thrive
I'd recommend a science-backed brand. Lots of wallet-saving options within those!
Thank you so much for the link! I really appreciate it!
Royal canin!
Thank you for your suggestion!
I switched all my dogs off of Victor a few months ago. One is on Hills and the other two are on Pro Plan. Their coats look better, they have more energy, and my one dog with joint issues is moving around better. Pro Plan is more budget friendly than Hills with more protein options, if you shop around you can usually find some deals on it. I have yet to pay full price for a bag.
where have you found pro plan on sale? I've never seen it discounted and its even excluded from automatic shipping discounts at petsmart.
I’ve been hearing a lot of people suggesting Pro Plan. I’ll look at it! Thank you so much!!
Pro Plan here too.
We are currently feeding our large dog blue buffalo life protection. Is there something else better? Just curious to hear other options
I have been feeding ProPlan for many years. My dogs thrive on it.
I'd definitely go with something that meets higher standards than Blue. The 5 brands that u/LogicalStats mentioned meet the highest available veterinary standards for research and expertise demonstrating their diets are excellent. I would absolutely pick one of those.
This is obviously a contentious topic, but I was curious if you could shed some light on some of the comments I have heard over the years. My vet has always recommended the big 5 brands for the reasons mentioned in your other comments. I have heard opinions, particularly in the rescue community, that these brands are junk, filler, and low quality. Specifically I have been alerted to concerns that there is nothing preventing these companies from using road kill, diseased animals, or euthanized animals in their kibble.
Any thoughts on this particular claim or why these brands have been labeled poor quality outside of veterinary community? Do you think it is because these brands typically offer foods at all price points and those formulas vary in ingredients and quality?
I am always sad to hear criticism of potential adopters for feeding one of the big 5 brands. These people are likely just following their vet’s recommendation, which to me is a hallmark of responsible pet ownership.
I started “doing my own research” on pet food back in 2008 . After the sudden death of my otherwise gorgeous 9 year old dog , most likely from a heart condition, my pendulum has swung back to trusting actual scientific vet nutrition experts and not self-proclaimed internet experts who are using “logic” and “common sense.” Until more is understood about the increasing incidence of heart issues in dogs fed “boutique” foods, I am going to stick with WSAVA currently recommended five brands mentioned here. (Yes I hope you hear the echoes of anti-vaccine people who “do their own research” on the internet instead of listening to actual medical professionals )
Sure!
>I have heard opinions, particularly in the rescue community, that these brands are junk, filler, and low quality.
There's so much going on here with these claims, it's hard to parse all of the countervailing trends that led to this. But truly, this is primarily feelings based propaganda spread by boutique brands and holistic vets who spurn anything that wasn't invented before 1950.
Blue Buffalo was among the first big brands to start marketing "whole ingredients, real meat, no fillers" but others followed suit pretty quickly. They did a whole bunch of targeted marketing around "feeding dogs like wolves" and "natural diets" and "biologically appropriate ingredients" none of which are based in science, but FEEL logical and true.
And at the same time humans were starting to hear really bad things about HUMAN health about sugar (high fructose corn syrup has been pushed by the corn industry! It's totally making us fat!), and gluten free diets were becoming a trend rather than a medical necessity for people with specific diseases. So when dog diets were being marketed as "no corn or wheat!" it triggered a "hell yeah, that's healthier!" reaction in a ton of people. Even though there's nothing wrong with gluten, and the corn in dog food is not remotely the same as high fructose corn syrup.
The term fillers is undoubtedly from boutique brands too. Fillers are ingredients that serve no nutritional value, but bulk up volume. Stuff like corn and wheat are packed with critical nutrients, and science-backed brands know how to use them in a balanced formula so that dogs are getting a wide range of digestible nutrients. Nobody can ever name what a filler is beyond a few grains they decide are bad.
I think it would be remiss to not mention the melamine scandal too, which happened in the late aughts 2007ish. It hit tons of dog food companies, baby formula, and human food so it was hardly just Purina's fault or something. But stuff being shipped in from China was being cut with melamine for a bunch of complex sociopolitical reasons (little quality regulation coupled with state pressure to maximize profits and growth and several unscrupulous manufacturers).
It was a wake up call for pretty much the entire food industry that not all countries are going to have the same regulations and that can cause consequences. There have also been MASSIVE overhauls in testing, import due dilgence, and general quality control since that time. But "Big Kibble" took a big hit.
>Specifically I have been alerted to concerns that there is nothing preventing these companies from using road kill, diseased animals, or euthanized animals in their kibble.
Yeah, this is just made up. This stuff is regulated FAR more closely than that. The definitions of what can go in food are tightly controlled.
https://www.aafco.org/Consumers/What-is-in-Pet-Food
ot only that, but... roadkill is just substantially more time consuming to collect and process than byproduct from cattle or chicken facilities is? This part always gets me. Driving around collecting dead raccoons is so much harder than paying a chicken plant for the leftovers in bulk.
This is an EXCELLENT overview of this and other myths:
https://www.veterinarypracticenews.com/pet-food-myths-june-2020/
>Any thoughts on this particular claim or why these brands have been labeled poor quality outside of veterinary community? Do you think it is because these brands typically offer foods at all price points and those formulas vary in ingredients and quality?
Mostly misinformation perpetuated by boutique brands, combined with human wellness trends that largely were also not based in science or evidence. And alllll of this started happening pretty soon after it become normal to do "internet research" and a a huge variety of blogs and social media groups and dog discussion boards showed up. That just set fire to how quickly some of this misinformation could spread.
One thing I've noticed also is this wider societal trend to believe everything is "rigged" and to spurn expertise. I am not one to deny that capitalism sucks and we should be careful where we get our info from, and the biases that go into it. But that doesn't mean spurning vet consensus and reams of scientific information writ large just because we can more openly acknowledge corporations are probably bad as a society.
This kind of thinking FEELS like critical thinking too. You're "digging deeper" than the "narrative" and it makes sense to people that corporations might be screwing them. Largely because in a lot of other arenas, corporations are screwing them. The obvious difference to me, is that any food you feed your dog in most places is going to come from a corporation. Boutique brands aren't exempt from that profit motive. Chicken manufacturers if you feed raw still suck.
I just think this righteous skepticism of corporations is unduly placed on the only corporations that are bothering to demonstrate some due diligence. I don't think Purina or Hills or whoever are flawless, I just think they're, on balance, the safest option for the vast majority of people.
>Do you think it is because these brands typically offer foods at all price points and those formulas vary in ingredients and quality
I definitely think that's part of it. Not that many people want to quibble with me about the ingredients in Purina Pro Plan, but if you bring up Dog Chow (which fun fact is one of the most highly tested diets in existence because it's used as a control diet in most animal studies) they go to town. Because that's a lower tier, less obviously "good" diet. I'd rather feed dog chow than like, zignature, any day personally. At least I know someone has evaluated how actual dogs do on that diet in a clinical setting.
>I am always sad to hear criticism of potential adopters for feeding one of the big 5 brands. These people are likely just following their vet’s recommendation, which to me is a hallmark of responsible pet ownership.
Yes! And it's funny, because I think A LOT of people who don't hestitate to trust their vet on vaccines and treatments for illnesses become a lot cagier when the vet talks to them about food. I think that speaks to how engrained some of these myths really are.
On the other hand, there is sometimes a general distrust of vets that they're "pushing" food and treatments, that they're "in it for the money" etc. I find that attitude to be a lot more pernicious, a lot harder to break, and a lot less rational than folks who get concerned only about food recommendations but generally trust their vets on other subjects.
Your recommended brands are Royal Canine, Purina, Iams, Hills, and Eukanuba.
You can’t go wrong with either of the above. I’ve had my dog try Royal Canine, Purina, and Iams with similar results only difference being price and kibble type.
Price is important Royal Canin is like WTF! Is there gold in this kibble?!
Pro Plan is great but Nestle (who owns Purina) is not. So please try to avoid Purina!
Latching onto this comment, as I don't think more advice related to this is worth a thread.
My dog has been on Petco Whole Hearted Grain Free dog food for about 4 years now (1-2 puppy, 2-3 adult).
If he has (4) years of being accustomed to grain free, would it be recommended to switch given the benefits? I am afraid that his body may not be used to other foods despite potentially being superior.
Purina is one of the best and are typically trashed by pretentious assholes on this sub who think if you don’t feed your dog raw, you’re abusing them.
Purina, Royal Canin, hills, Iams and Eukanuba
My pup is on Pro Plan and loves it. The first comment he gets is about his coat; it’s beautiful and he is a very healthy boy.
Any food brands for dogs you would recommend? Specifically for a staffie - thank you!
Bella and Duke if you want raw, Canagan if you want kibble, and Dayles Ford Organic dog food if you want canned. from my experience i can highly recommend all of them. maybe expensive but you get what you pay for. I however personally cook for my 2 staffies every day.
Our old boy did amazingly on Butchers wet grain free. He also had a kibble topper from Tails.com. We also gave him salmon oil as he got older. He was in perfect shape, loads of energy, glossy coat, and the best bit…very little farting!
Our current girl has significant health issues, so she’s on a hypoallergenic/hepatic kibble diet.
I feed my two raw - I use “totally natural” (who have just rename to “Kibo”).
I also add frozen sprats (which they think are the best treat in the world) and also eggs, yogurt and veggies
We've used butternut and different dog as ours was really fussy with food
My fussy dog dislikes butternut box now 😭
We switched to different dog after butternut and he seemed to like it, we sometimes would small mixtures of both for a change, they're such fussy pups it's hard sometimes. Some days he would just be like nah I'm done with this, spend another £60 for me to go off it after 2 meals 😂
We give our guy wholeprey salmon kibble. 80:20 ratio of meat to veggies. It has no grains, no fillers.
I’ve seen so much conflicting information on what dog food brands are good, and I’m curious what brands you use and why you chose the brand?
Pro plan savor - my dog has a sensitive tummy!! Anything else (merrick, taste of the wild, nutro, etc) gave him diarrhea
I’ve been looking into this! My dog no longer likes her kibble so I’m hoping this works
I feed my dogs Taste of the Wild Ancient Grains because it’s the only food that doesn’t give my little dog hotspots. She’s 11, and we’ve tried everything from Science Diet to a raw diet.
Plus it has glucosamine in the food for her old lady joints.
I use nature's domain from Costco. From what I have heard it is just rebranded and therefore less expensive Nutro which is one of the leading brands based on quality
UK based here, originally had my rescue on Harringtons brand food but her poops were too soft so started her on a higher protein brand Wainwrights which made an immediate difference. Also discovered that she was sensitive to common proteins in dog foods, such as beef and lamb >_>
I feed my dog raw. I do use a local supplier who delievers but they use no preservatives. I personally feel like raw/real food beats any kibble any day.
There's no real science so far that tells us raw food is better than kibble in any way. It also carries significant risks of spreading harmful bacteria, and is incredibly easy to feed an unbalanced raw diet unless you routinely consult a veterinary nutritionist.
There's no point man. Raw feeders will never be convinced.
My dog is raw fed as well, OP! As will be done with all future dogs (and/or cats). Commercial raw can be expensive if you have a larger dog, but some intro brands in my area would be: Northwest Naturals, Vital Essentials, Primal, Stella & Chewy
I'm getting a dog for the first time and I'm not sure which brand of dog food is best. Any recommendations or tips would be really appreciated!
if may budget Royal Canin. if mid budget, vitality,hollistic or brit. yan mga subok ko.
Basta check the ingredients!
Nagulat ako may salt ang pedigree and ayun may salt deposits na baby ko sa bladder
Pass talaga sa Pedigree 😭
Try Royal Canin..
Holistic
I give my girl Inukshuk 30/25 and Red Oak 30/25. Maarte sa pagkain yung dog ko and so far ito yung gusto niya na pinagaalternate ko every 2 months. My advice lang is to look for kibble na ang first ingredient ay "beef/chicken/fish meal" and not grain kasi that means puro filler lang yon.
Another factor bakit ako nagstick sa current food namin is yung skin issues na nakita ko sa dobergirl ko. Beef Pro, while good sa ingredients, is too oily so nagka-pimples siya sa likod. We switched to Special Dog and maganda naman kaso need ko ng mas protein for her dahil nag-dog school siya and mas maganda yung pang-high performance. Pag balik niya baka bumalik kami sa Special Dog (kasi mas tamad ako than her trainers hahahah).
I saw other parents here na nagrerecommend ng Holistic pero we haven't tried it yet. Trial and error talaga pero make sure na kaya mo isustain ipapatikim mo. Hirap lalo pag naging picky eater ang pet. Good luck!
Hello fellow golden owners!!
I have a 14 month old golden retriever girl — Olive (photo included, obvs).
She is the light of my life + favorite creature in the world. I spoil her in every way I can, from toys to giving her the most comfortable space and beds.
I obviously want her to live the longest life that is possible — that said I would love to hear some opinions about the best dog food irregardless of price. I’m not interested in kibble/super processed food, only either freeze dried/ gently dried foods, or cooked fresh. I’m not sure about raw as our vet is very against it and I would rather be on the safe side, we also don’t have any farmers by us where we could guarantee the freshness/source etc.
Currently she’s eating unkibble turkey + beef — which honestly I only have great reviews for. She had great poops and loves her food (that said — there is no food she won’t eat, cat kibble to random things she will find outside 😭😭😭). Her fur looks great and I don’t have any complaints (nor does she).
I would really love to hear about what you’re feeding your own dogs to give them the best life + longest lifespan!
Quick question for the person downvoting Purina Pro Plan, why are you downvoting it? I’m genuinely curious. As I feed my puppy Purina Pro Plan and add puréed pumpkin to it.
I definitely didn't down vote that, but we opted against Purina pro plan since they are owned by Nestle.
We had it narrowed down to Purina pro plan, hills, and Royal canin. Purina is owned by Nestle, Hills is owned by Colgate which is a public company with Black Rock being a massive share holder while Royal canin is owned by Mars inc. which is a private family owned business. Albeit a massive one, they seemed to have the biggest focus on sustainability and ethical sourcing.
Those are the three our vet recommended and meet all the AAFCO and wsava guidelines and how we narrowed it down from there
Pumpkin is so excellent for their health.
I'm noticing ingredients in dog food at the store that are not suppose to be in dog food, like ALLL the time I see it.
Except for dehydrated liver chunk or dried meat I don't buy any preprocessed food for my girls.
And making their food becomes easy once in a rhythm of knowing and doing the steps.
I may have my Heart set on ASD but I love allllllll dogs and cats.
Our vet and quite a bit of research told us to steer clear of anything that isn't kibble, and more specifically anything that doesn't meet AAFCO and wsava standards. Which is a pretty short list
This! Lost our first dog to DCM caused by diet. He died at 3, was fed Acana the first 2 years of his life.
Sorry to hear that but to understand your answer are you saying Acana food was the reason behind your dogs death?
Purina Pro Plan is apparently one of the most researched food there is, that’s what I used for my 9 month old golden.
I used to use hills science diet large puppy but his poops weren’t always solid/he stopped like it.
No issues with Purina pro plan for large puppy breeds, I also add 1 scoop of wet food from costco to change it up for him and I add water to the food
My cats eat Purina but my dog needs prescription so he gets Hills prescription diet. Any brand that follows WSAVA guidelines is good by me!
My golden did best on this. He has allergies so the salmon and rice formula was great for us. He’s overweight currently so he has to be on special vet food and the allergies are back :( definitely wish we could go back to PPP
Disagree. Many vets are incentivized by Purina, and promote the hell out of Pro-Plan when in fact it is really overprice, overhyped garbage.
Foods that meet WSAVA standards, which is a very short list. We feed Purina Pro Plan currently.
100% agreed. If you knew what they put in the blend you'll probably cry due to sadness and never offer it to your babies again... Cause that's how I felt when I learned about it
I will have a dog for the first time and I don't know which brand is the best for him.
The big 3 that meet WSAVA guidelines: Purina Pro, Royal Canin, Hills Science Diet
Eukabana and Iams also meet these guidelines.
You’re going to get a lot of different answers, the best type of food to one person is going to be a lot different than another. There’s also a lot of discourse around raw fed, gently cooked fed vs kibble fed. Bottom line is, the most high quality food that you can afford is best, and fed is best. If your dog is happily eating the food and is by all accounts healthy, then that’s a good food. For me, I subscribe to the mentality of the more ingredients I can pronounce and actually know of the better. For that reason, I don’t touch WSAVA foods (purine, royal, hills). Absolutely no judgement for anyone who does, but for me, I like eating food that isn’t full of preservatives and “fake” things so I follow the same with my dog. He gets 50/50 of open farm kibble, which is also sustainably sourced, and gently cooked raised right, which is an 8 ingredient completely balanced gently cooked fresh food. The best food is going to be based on your budget and your mentality. Some people go with the if it’s WSAVA it’s the best, some people go with if it’s complete and balanced and the more ingredients I can pronounce the better. Neither are wrong. And again, fed is best. But “best” is so subjective and similar to google, you’re going to get a lot of varied responses.
When my vet suggested putting my dog on weight management food, they gave us Royal Canin weight mgmt, and I noticed that the first ingredient was CELLULOSE. Thank you, NO, not feeding my dog what is essentially cardboard, as a filler.
I switched her to Purina Pro Weight Management, after some research. A lot of the ingredients are grains, but grains aren't bad for dogs. People seem to be stuck on feeding their dogs high protein diets, which isn't actually good for them. I can't personally manage a raw food diet for her, and I would absolutely cook her food if I thought it would be better for her, but she is in perfect health, very fit, at a great weight, and happy as pie. So I'm not sure that I need to change anything?
Not trying to be argumentative at all, I honestly don't know any better than my own personal experience, but that isn't fact, by any means!
I actually feed my dog a grain inclusive kibble from open farm so I don’t disagree. Of course there are grains that can be better vs worse, but yup I feed my dog grains. Like I said in my original comments, if they’re eating and healthy, that’s best. Similar to you when you didn’t pick what your vet first suggested, I just did my own research to find what I thought was the best food I could afford. For me I just believe that if my dog can have a complete and balanced diet on the most whole foods and limited ingredient list then that’s what I’m going to feed him so I bought complete and balanced kibble and fresh food that meets that requirements. Others disagree and that’s ok, no judgement on what you feed your dog, it varies so much by situation and by dog!
I don’t make my own fresh food, I buy it just like you would buy kibble. “Raised Right recipes contain a transparent and limited ingredient list while meeting all the Association of American Feed Control Officials' (AAFCO) requirements for a complete and balanced diet” from https://www.dogster.com/lifestyle/raised-right-dog-food-review. It meets all the requirements for a complete and balanced diet.
I use Science Diet, dry and canned. We mix it together. When we adopted our dog she was always itching herself. That has since gone away. I partially attribute that to her diet. There are many brands recommended here, I would go with one of those that fits your budget.
Science Diet is definitely the way to go
Personally i buy royal canin for jack russel breed, my dog has some jrt in her and its one of her favourites. Kibble is perfect size for her small mouth
I like Purina Pro Plan
The best brand is the one you can afford and that your dog digests well.
My girl is on Purina Pro Plan sensitive skin and stomach (lab and oatmeal) because she has GI issues. She is allergic to chicken and she is prone to pancreatitis if she eats anything too high in protein and fat. She also had terrible skin issues when I rescued her. This food has done amazing things for her coat. We get compliments all the time.
I cook for my dog, usually I put no more than 5 ingredients. But they vary. Veggies vary, the meat vary... The scientific proves are blod test results and medical exams. After giving up on kibbles, my shih tzu has 0 allergies, her long fur is beautiful, no more red under her eyes and no more vomiting, or stomach problems. We humans cook for ourselves, dogs ate cooked food 50 years ago. Industry will try to sell any garbage as scientifically proved as is good. The reason why I started to cook for my dog, is because one day I opened a can of expensive wet food, all scientifically proved good and she just didn't ate. When I took a spoon of it and taste it, it had sand, or dirt in it. Since then, I only give her cooked food. I saw a documentary about how food for dogs is produced. Is horrible.
best dog food brands
Key Considerations for Choosing Dog Food Brands:
Nutritional Value: Look for brands that meet the AAFCO (Association of American Feed Control Officials) standards. Ensure the food contains high-quality protein sources, healthy fats, and essential vitamins and minerals.
Ingredients: Choose brands that list real meat (like chicken, beef, or fish) as the first ingredient. Avoid foods with fillers, artificial preservatives, and by-products.
Life Stage and Size: Select food formulated for your dog's specific life stage (puppy, adult, senior) and size (small, medium, large) to meet their unique nutritional needs.
Special Dietary Needs: If your dog has allergies or sensitivities, consider brands that offer grain-free, limited ingredient, or hypoallergenic options.
Brand Reputation: Research the brand's history, recalls, and customer reviews. Brands with a strong reputation for quality and safety are preferable.
Top Recommended Dog Food Brands:
Orijen: Known for high protein content and fresh, regional ingredients. Great for active dogs.
Blue Buffalo: Offers a variety of formulas, including grain-free options, with a focus on natural ingredients.
Wellness: Provides balanced nutrition with high-quality proteins and no fillers, suitable for various life stages.
Taste of the Wild: Grain-free options with real meat and a focus on natural ingredients, often praised for palatability.
Hill's Science Diet: Recommended by veterinarians, especially for dogs with specific health issues, offering tailored nutrition.
Recommendation: When selecting a dog food brand, consider your dog's specific needs and preferences. It's often beneficial to consult with your veterinarian to determine the best diet for your pet's health and lifestyle.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.