The Doctor's Companions
Doctor Who is often seen as a story about the Doctor's companions rather than the Doctor themselves. The companions are crucial to the narrative, providing different perspectives and emotional depth to the stories [1:1]. The Doctor travels alone but gains and loses companions along the way, shaping their journey and experiences
[1]. This dynamic can be likened to writing, where characters are shaped by the narratives they inhabit
[1].
Thirteenth Doctor's Personality
The Thirteenth Doctor is described as empathetic and social, akin to a "Social Worker Doctor" [2]. She shares traits with previous Doctors, such as the Eleventh Doctor's social awkwardness and cheerfulness despite underlying darkness
[2]. Some viewers feel she lacks unique characteristics compared to other incarnations, seeing her as a culmination of what the Doctor represents
[2:3]. Her reluctance to reveal personal details adds complexity to her character
[2:5].
Tenth Doctor's Evolution
The Tenth Doctor is perceived as a reinterpretation of the Ninth Doctor, reflecting deeper trauma and guilt from the Time War [3]. His personality is marked by anger, contrasting with the Ninth Doctor's denial and drifting state
[3:2]. The Tenth Doctor's darker side emerges after losing Rose and realizing the Daleks survived, challenging his belief that Gallifrey's destruction was justified
[3:3]
[3:5].
Psychoanalytic Perspectives
There are psychoanalytic interpretations of Doctor Who, exploring the inner world of the Doctor and the show's themes. Books like The Inner World of Doctor Who offer reflections on the character from a psychoanalytic perspective [4:2]. These analyses provide deeper insights into the Doctor's psychology and the impact of their experiences across different incarnations.
Character Presence and Writing
The Doctor's presence is a defining trait, commanding attention and leading others through their understanding of time [5]. However, some viewers feel certain portrayals, like Jodie Whittaker's, lacked the grandstand moments that define the Doctor's character
[5:5]
[5:6]. Poor writing and directing have been cited as reasons for this, with suggestions for a more ethereal portrayal similar to Luna Lovegood from Harry Potter
[5:9].
So, I am working on my book and I am letting myself take a “break”.
Doctor Who is a story about a person who travels around fantasy realms, time and space, discovering along the way companions to join the journey . The doctor travels alone and at each point along the journey, loses some companions and gains others.
The stories told in Doctor Who are the stories of the Doctor’s companions, not the Doctor.
As a writer, I couldn’t help but see the parallels between that dynamic, and the characters we write. The characters we write are shaped by the choices we made, the people we knew, and the stories we have been a part of.
But, the tragedy is the doctor never gets to live with the people he helped to shape. He says, to one of the companions who intended to stay with him forever, “You can spend the rest of your life with me. But I can’t spend the rest of mine with you.”
It’s only his role to come into their lives, learn a little bit about who they are, then give the companions the most formative experiences of their lives, conflicts to overcome, relationships they will never let go of. They change the Doctor and the relationship is mutual. But at some point, the doctor has to move on. They only stay there for that period in their lives. We may know where their stories are headed- we usually get that much closure- but we almost never get to see their ending. The Doctor may know where the path leads after she leaves her companions behind. But she does not get to walk it with them.
She gets to live through the most intense upheavals, greatest trials, and formative moments in these people’s lives. People whose stories she has written, as the only one with the power to travel through space and time. People who may get their happy endings, in some sense of the word. Or they may lose their memories or even die. But even in the case of a happy ending, it's a happy ending without the Doctor in it.
Sometimes, the Doctor wishes he could stay. But the tragedy of them being from two separate worlds prevents this. He just wants to leave a part of himself behind. A clone of sorts that gets to live through the end of the story with the person he shaped. But it's not him. It's just someone who stands in his place.
And at some point, she still has to leave. She has to move on, find new companions and adventures to right, but she isn’t the same person she used to be. She may have changed others, but the stories changed her, too. She changes through that journey as much, if not more, than the others. And she isn’t allowed to make those journeys alone.
Writers are never allowed to make the journey through fantasy, science fiction, or history alone. There is an ever-changing cast of characters whose arcs guide those journeys. And at some point, the cast shifts, and one or the other has to say goodbye. Another writer has to finish the work of someone who passed away. Or, more commonly, you finish writing one story, and have to say goodbye to your characters. Characters whose futures are now set and usually have some variation of a regular life ahead of them.
Keep writing, you all.
(I am well aware this might be one of those metaphors that only made sense in my head. But maybe this will resonate with someone. )
A very thought provoking analysis of being a writer and one I wholeheartedly agree with.
Thank you! Appeciate it!
> the tragedy is the doctor never gets to live with the people he helped to shape.
Thank god I don’t have to live with my characters. They all have horrible lives.
Yeah I think it applies more to some people than others. I don't think I would want to live in the fantasy universe I created either, despite what I wrote above.
>The stories told in Doctor Who are the stories of the Doctor’s companions, not the Doctor.
This is why I love the show so much. It wouldn’t be as fun if it were just about the Doctor.
With 2 series under her belt, how would you describe the Thirteenth Doctor's personality and as a character?
Personally, she kind of reminds me of the Eleventh Doctor sometimes, because they're both social awkward people who try to stay cheerful but have some darkness inside.
I like to describe 13 as the "Social Worker Doctor", because she displays a lot of empathy towards others.
I would describe her personality as being the Doctor. A lot of people have complained that she's not very unique in her personality, and I completely agree, but I don't see it as a bad thing - she's a culmination of everything the Doctor represents and I think that's a very clever decision given what we've just learnt about the Timeless Child. She is the Doctor who learnt that she wasn't who she thought she was, whilst being everything she always has been. She's an explorer, excited about life and the universe like the first and eighth Doctors, she's lighthearted like the second, fourth, seventh, and eleventh Doctors, she's a scientist like the third Doctor, she's kind like the fifth and twelfth Doctors, but with a darker side like the sixth, seventh, War, ninth, and twelfth Doctors. She definitely isn't unique, but she's definitely the Doctor.
It's not that she isnt unique. It's that shes subtle. She isnt outwardly eccentric, alien, arrogant, or angry. She IS NuWho's version of the 5th doctor. Both are very understated.
When I say she isn't unique, I mean she doesn't have any specific character traits that another Doctor doesn't have.
I would describe her as the Doctor who destroyed Doctor Who.
When they are writing her the best, she is using her outwardly caring/friendly but eccentric persona to mask how little she reveals about herself.
There are some great scenes in a Series 12 where Graham confronts the Doctor about how little they know about her and she demonstrates huge reluctance to discuss her true origins with any of them, things that the Doctor has casually discussed off screen with past companions.
This version of the character is running from who (haha) she is. Maybe what happened with Bill and Missy at the end of 12 was to much, but 13 is looking for a reset. She wants to escape all the awful things she’s gone through and just have adventures with friends.
Bland
Boring
Coupled with companions that combiner, have less character/personality than any other companion before.
Ryan has coordination issues. That's his personality. That's all i could think of for all 3 of them.
Generous ��
Absent
After rewatching both, I’m convinced the tenth doctor wasn’t just a new personality but a reinterpretation of the ninth, one that reflected the trauma and guilt of the Time War even more deeply. The question is: did the tenth really evolve or was he a regeneration trying to mask something darker from the ninth’s history? Thoughts?
I think all the Doctors are stages of grief
9 is denial. I don’t think he really GETS the fact Gallifrey is gone. Or at least, it’s too raw for all of his darkness to be on full display. He’s just…drifting.
10 is anger. All the Doctors get angry, but 10 was a ruthless cold fury none of the other doctors post time war had. He could do the most unhinged punishment to you and not even blink.
11 is bargaining. Specifically, bargaining with himself. Wrestling with how horrific a person he’s capable of being, and trying to make amends with himself.
12 is grief. He’s old, he’s grumpy, a jaded, traumatized veteran whose scars remain sensitive if prodded, and he’s still trying to get a grasp of himself as a person. But he’s the most sincere when he’s kind. It’s not a mask anymore to cope or think “see? I’m a cool guy.” That’s simply what he does naturally, even if he struggles to account for that in his view of himself.
13 is acceptance. She’s learned to forgive herself for what happened, or at least live with herself. She’s far happier, genuinely at least, compared to previous doctors.
It’s by no means a perfect analogy, but the way I see it, the 10th is the Doctor at his lowest point across his entire life. The Doctor who is drowning in self disdain and a willingness to do the unthinkable, or think the worst of others. 9 is what precedes this; a Doctor in “shock” and not really in a place to truly confront what he did.
I think what happened with 10 is 9’s arc of learning to like himself again manifested itself with 10’s massive ego. By thinking he was cool, it meant thinking all of himself was cool. Which caused a lot of friction with the time war guilt he already had.
Also consider that the s1 finale basically revealed that his sacrifice of galfirey was pointless, because some daleks still survive. I think a reason 9 was more, I want to say mellow, was because he thought the sacrifice he made at least worked. It’s the next regen that has to live with the knowledge it didn’t.
10 would think the Daleks themselves are gone until Doomsday. That's where he started getting darker alongside losing Rose. After the Battle Of Canary Wharf he probably did see the destruction of Gallifrey as pointless.
In Daleks In Mahatten he mutters to himself "They always survive and I lose everything."
He doesn’t say it till daleks in Manhattan but I like to think post s1 it’s at least a nagging feeling for him. Twice at that point he’d run into daleks, including a whole armada that managed to survive/rebuild.
Then like you said he gets the one two punch of more daleks and losing Rose.
10’s spiral is really interesting.
I think that connection is just the through line of him still being the same person, deep down at his core. It's a new personality, a new incarnation, but that doesn't change the trauma and history he has that's still affecting him.
It'd be interesting to connect them more though, having their character arc more directly carry over from one Doctor to another. As so far that's something that's been more contained to each Doctor, with their arc being more or less wrapped up before they regenerate, and a new one starting with the new Doctor. Even with RTD and Moffat showrunning for multiple Doctors, those were largely kept separate.
100% agree.
9 gradually improved himself
10 gradually got worse
I don’t think I quite agree with the assessment of 13. There’s a bit of an acceptance of self but with the introduction of Gallifrey destroyed definitively, the Flux along with the Timeless Child bombshell I think all these revelation made her’s kinda fall back to where 12 or 9 was. Seeing 10 as 14 with 13’s trauma made 15 more of that accepting type so much so he could openly talk about Susan while the prior incarnations couldn’t.
Has anyone engaged in a psycho-analysis of Doctor Who? Or knows of things written from a psychoanalytic perspective on the show or the character of the Doctor? Also, any Whovians in here?
The Inner World of Doctor Who: Psychoanalytic Reflections in Time and Space
Book by Iain MacRury and Michael Rustin
I was at a conference for the past two days and saw this book there! Didn't pick it up so not sure if it's exactly what you are looking for but may be worth a try!
As you might have guessed from my username, I quite like Doctor Who :)
I haven't read anything psychoanalytic about the show but there is The Black Archive series put out by Obverse Books which features monograph-style books on each episode. From the description, the one on Listen seems to incorporate Freudian ideas.
That adds quite a new twist to the line in your bio, "Nothing human is alien to me"
Thank you for the recommendation, I will check that out!
I was rewatching some of the episodes during Jodie's run and was trying to figure out what was bothering me so much.
Let me preface this by saying that I love Peter Capaldi's portrayal the most, then 9, 10, 11, 15 and 13.
The reason I love the character so much is because of their overwhelming presence. They command the room just by being there, they can see further beyond than anyone else, they see, feel and understand time. It is one of the main traits of the character that people simply follow their lead, but this needs to be supported by good scripts and great acting.
With Jodie, she just never has this. You never feel that she is in control, a lot of plot points are resolved by accident, when she needs to be serious, she turns up the goofiness. A lot of that comes from poor scripts, but it's also an acting choice.
With 9 and 12 you simply always feel safe, you know they will find a way, they always seem to be in control even when things seem completely lost. 10 is also up there with them, it's just my preference that I enjoy 9 and 12 more, they portray the character a bit better in my opinion.
With Ncuti, this comes through only occasionally, he has a strong presence, but it needs to be emphasized more.
With 11 I only felt this sometimes, he was overshadowed by River Song at times. He was goofy too often for my taste. We didn't have this with 12 and Missy, they seemed like equals.
What do you think?
I mean, I don't love The Doctor's character because of their overwhelming presence. The Doctor is a person who tries to be good despite all their flaws. The Doctor is always scared but tries to cover that up and be in control, sometimes it won't work but The Doctor still tries to help.
The Doctor being 10 steps ahead is cool for sure, and it shows that they're willing to be secretive and sometimes manipulative in order to keep their friends calm and their enemies unaware. That being said, it's ultimately just a method The Doctor uses, it's not the core of them.
The Thirteenth Doctor doesn't have the same presence as the Twelfth Doctor, but her core is still the same. She's scared but she wants to help. That's why I love The Doctor. They may put on a brave face but they're ultimately still that little boy crying in a barn not wanting anyone else to see.
I love the Twelfth Doctor because he's deeply flawed but he's ultimately trying to do the right thing and he's working to fix himself. His presence is at least partly a mask he puts on to convince himself and others that he's in control, but you can still see the scared boy underneath.
In fact I love the Thirteenth Doctor partially because this presence isn't always there. It can be easier to see her fear and to see she's still pushing through it like she's always done.
The Doctor being able to sense time, being able to think ahead of everyone and be 10 steps ahead, those are all "toys" as the Fourteenth Doctor put it. They're cool but they aren't the core of The Doctor. No matter what though, The Doctor is a flawed person who still tries to do the right thing.
The Fifteenth Doctor has shown moments where he's scared as shit but still has to figure something out. When he's on the landmine for example, he had to stay as calm as possible and push through his fear to figure something out. We see him in The Well being terrified about what the entity knew but still trying to figure out how to get who he can out of there. He's terrified of these Gods but knows that there is a way to beat them no matter how unlikely so he outwits them when they're arrogant and new to this world.
So no, it's definitely not The Doctor's presence that makes me love their character. It's not The Doctor being in control. It's knowing that The Doctor is really none of these things but still tries to help.
This also makes sense to me. I guess it all comes down to preference. I guess for me with some Doctors I never felt that their character shines through with all their flaws as you mentioned. Still for me, the Doctor is described as the Oncoming Storm and is perceived as this magnificent traveller, all those villains fear the Doctor. There are many ways to convey this presence, and I feel with some Doctors we never or rarely see it. 😊
I never felt that Jodie Whitaker was ever given a big grandstand moment to make her Doctor stand out. The show spent waaaay to much time on her companions, as if it didn't trust her enough to be the lead - which is crazy, as she's genuinely a brilliant actor. Ultimately, the writing let her down.
Absolutely. The Haunting of Diodoti is the only episode that she feels remotely like the Doctor.
Jodie's doctor always felt like a secondary character rather than the main character. Even in Flux she was secondary to the antagonist and even the recordings.
Not sure if it was a bad writer, a writer who had no idea how to write the Doctor, or both.
Facts.....she never had her "the pandorica opens" moment. An I loved jodies doctor but she never had a this is why you should fear me moment.
Pandorica was certainly a nig show moment but he was already grandstanding in the Eleventh Hour. The end scene, both of them, are pretty character defining.
Not just the writing but the directing Chibnall gave her was also questionable at best. Telling her not to do any research on the character beforehand left her at the mercy of the showrunner to forge her character and what we got was a basic interpretation of the Doctor's traits without any kind of deeper understanding or uniqueness to really make them work. This shallowness led to a lot of confusion on 13's moral stances in certain stories. The best way to describe her is a fusion of 10 and 11 without any of the highs.
Which is BS because one reason why Matt won over as many people as he did in his first episode is because he did his research.
Bro phoned Moffat in the middle of the night because he really enjoyed Tomb of the Cybermen.
13 suffered from poor characterisation, basically being an inferior 11.
A better characterisation in my opinion would have been closer to Luna Lovegood from Harry Potter. A more ethereal, kooky potrayal but one who's nevertheless wise, brave, tough and loving.
I’ve long wanted Evanna Lynch, who played Luna Lovegood, to play the Doctor as a child.
Jodie never got her Pandorica speech moment.
I'm sure this not the first time this conversation has surfaced but I've been thinking about the different kind of companions in NuWho and I feel like they can essentially be condensed into two types, those that act as sort of as the audience, just being along for the ride and exists to showcase the Doctor or for the plot (e.g Rose) or those that rather supplements the doctor and sometimes challenges him (e.g Donna). That being said, they are all atleast a little bit of each but ultimately they usually end up being oriented more to one side of the spectrum
Now assuming they got a time lord's big brain, I feel like the following would make great Doctors on their own:
We haven't seen enough of her yet but purely judging from episode 1 & 4, I believe Belinda might also show a lot of potential.
Obviously this is just my personal list but I am curious to see who other people think would qualify and for what reasons
I've always thought that they missed a serious opportunity to do a Jenny spin off. A young Time Lord without all the Time Lord BS. They still could, as she could have regenerated multiple times since we last saw her, so she could be played by anyone.
I'd go a step further than that. I wish that
they hadn't introduced the concept of time lords changing gender.
the doctor had actually died after 13 regenerations (although I don't really care if the 10th doctors weird half regeneration counts)
the main line doctor who show had continued with a female time lord (time lady?) for 13 regenerations.
They could have a had a season of the doctor grappling with the fact that he was on his last life. They could have brought his daughter back as a companion and had him pass on the torch. She could even have taken his name.
The name that time lords takes is supposed to be like a promise you make after all. And what better promise than to continue her father's legacy?
The progressive people would have been happy, because there's going to be a female doctor for the foreseeable future. Fans of the show would be happy, because it brings back a fan favourite and doesn't retroactively change how regeneration works.
You'd have a new main character who would approach things slightly differently. We could see her come to grips with what it takes to be the doctor and she'd be free to make a lot of stupid mistakes, because she's new to this.
Big Finish have done Jenny stuff
Gotta be honest, I had completely forgotten about Jenny. Definitely missed opportunity
Season 4 Rose was basically her own Doctor, especially in Turn Left.
I think Zoe from classic who would also work,
I'm not entirely convinced Zoe would've been a good Doctor, but saying that - she DEFINITELY enjoyed destroying the computerised receptionist at International Electromatics; that was very much a Doctor-type thing to do in that moment! ^^
I'd also put forward Nyssa; I'd say she was even more "on the Doctor's wavelength" than Zoe, most of the time. ^^
Yes Zoe would be good.
I don’t really remember that part actually, isn’t she trapped in a parallel reality?
In turn left she crosses in Donna’s parallel world where the doctor’s dead and guides her
I dont think any of them could play the Doctor because of the following Reasons:
Clara practically is "The Doctor" in some episodes and she leaves with a tardis
Donna, She shares a similar personality sometimes and is fun af but she works more as The Special Companion / The Best Companion lmfao
River Song she also is very Similar to the Doctor
Amy just wouldnt work imo
Rose is like a god and she also Is again... basically her own doctor
I mean, that was Clara's ending, in no uncertain terms.
Martha
I feel that 13's personality isn't as obvious as other doctors like 2 being quite timid or 11 being quite silly (those descriptions are heavily simplified). Usually I can tell a new doctor's personality by at least episode 3 but a whole series with 13 and I'm still uncertain. There's contradictions in her personality, like in one episode she says, "I love a good conspiracy." but in another episode she says, "... I hate conspiracies."
So I was wondering what other people see her personality as.
It reminds me of the change from 4 to 5. Baker, and Pertwee before him, were oversized, outlandish, and occasionally bombastic, all things 5 was not. What made that so important was that it showed how broad the possibilities were for adding character types to the Doctor. 13 has been a similar change. After 10 years of messianic, demi-God, oncoming storm, which I loved, there was little room left for development in that direction. I love Jodie's quiet optimistic, childish, Doctor of Hope and think that it's a much needed reset. There's room for her version to grow. So ... her personality? "Quiet Steel"
She's a lot more childish; she's impulsive and doesn't really think things through too much. When she's angry at someone, she doesn't get serious and dramatic like previous Doctors, she just tries to wind them up or, in the case of Krasko, deliberately provokes him into attacking her, knowing that his neural restrictor will activate and cause him pain. (Seriously, anyone who says we never saw 13's darker moments needs to watch that scene again, because taunting a guy into torturing himself was pretty damn dark. More of that please, Chibbers)
On the other hand, she's also more willing to admit when she's wrong about something, and doesn't feel the need to take control of every situation if someone else has an idea of their own. She even credits Ryan for the plan to pose as Kerb!am workers, even though it was her idea.
Never really thought about that moment with Krasko the way you described. I remember their encounters mostly because they were one of the few times she had the chance to actually be intimidating for a change. She was "cool" and in in control when confronting him, just as assertive as she needed to be against a person who she needs to mind carefully but clearly doesn't respect.
If her goal was to be careful around him, she did a poor job. In their warehouse scene she throws his briefcase into his own weapons fire with a 'Whoops' and pulls the Vortex Manipulator of his wrist to stamp on it, which is what makes him choke her. Even as she's being strangled, she's still making fun of him. And then when he says his name's Krasko, her response is just 'Don't like it'.
What I really like about Chibnall’s Doctor is that she isn’t always needing make Pompeii-equivalent decisions to save the world. I think that’s the point he’s trying to make. Especially with “Rosa.” All they need to do is sit down in a bus to change the shape of history - little things like that.
She’s found Gallifrey, she has a team. Honestly, it’s been so long that she’s had an entourage that I think she is still adjusting. But she is happy if still a bit unsure of herself. She’s never been a woman, and didn’t quite know how to react in “Witchhunt.” Even said it’d have been different if she were still a bloke.
She’s a new, new Doctor! Probably has her equivalent of fingers in a jar of jam, or fish custard. She doesn’t feel lost and alone in the universe anymore. As a trauma victim myself, I recognize the signs of recovery. If something terrible happens to her, we might yet see another side. The grandiose Doctor of War may return.
But this is my point: I think instead of the grand, sweeping gestures the Doctor has needed in the past, the 13th is showing us that it’s the little things that make all the difference. That we can be the Doctor. Rather than Ten’s reply to Martha in The Shakespeare Code, after she reminds him of the Butterfly Effect, and he shrugs her off and says “just don’t step on any Butterflies - what have butterflies ever done to you?” Love the cheek. Chibnall is emphasizing the importance of butterflies, of that tiny push - Neil Cross’s beautiful story of Clara’s leaf that was the most important thing in human history.
It’s different, seeing humanity able to save itself with the help of the Doctor. It takes us back. I love it, and I also love the Doctor Who blows up Cyber Legions to make a point. I love them both.
Series 11 was too short in my opinion and there was one character in the TARDIS too many (Yaz), so it didn't spend as much time as it should have defining Thirteen's personality, but her personality is there.
Ten, Eleven and Twelve were all pretty haughty and overconfident in different ways, believing they could do almost anything as time lords until they would get a reality check that they really couldn't. During the Moffat era, the Doctor had a string of painful, increasingly sad failures. He couldn't give Melody a normal childhood, he couldn't save Amy and Rory from the Weeping Angels, he couldn't help Clara save Danny, he couldn't do more for Clara than buying her some more time before having to face the raven (and he nearly went insane doing that), and finally, when the Doctor tried to reform Missy, he, Bill, Nardole and Missy all died, and as far as the Doc knows, it was all for nothing since Missy abandoned him. Twelve was in a pretty dark place when he regenerated, and as a result, Thirteen's confidence levels seemed to have taken a hit. In "The Ghost Monument", Thirteen is mortified that she's gotten Ryan, Graham and Yaz trapped on a desert planet where they'll eventually be murdered by flying rags, and she's only just met these people. In "Arachnids In The UK", she admits she isn't sure she'll be able to get them all home safe and alive, despite how much they trust her. Throughout the season, Thirteen is very worried about what effect her meddling could have on history, which finally comes to a head in "The Witchfinders", when she becomes more involved than usual, spurred on by the injustices she couldn't prevent in "Rosa" and "The Demons Of Punjab". In general, Thirteen seems to be more unsure of herself than her three predecessors, and more reliant on her friends / sidekicks for support.
Mind you, Thirteen's worries are not entirely unjustified, because we've seen her make some really bad judgment calls. Thirteen's primary character flaw, and the one that's been acknowledged in-universe, seems to be carelessness and impulsiveness. Her plan to retrieve the TARDIS in "The Woman Who Fell To Earth" gets herself and the others sucked into the vacuum of space, where they would have choked if dumb luck hadn't bailed them out. In "The Tsuranga Conundrum", Thirteen having them all scrounge through a junkyard, looking for who knows what, gets them all blown up, and afterwards she gets chewed out by Astos for almost making everything worse than it already was because she was only thinking about herself and the TARDIS. In "Resolution", Thirteen's crazy plan to get rid of the Dalek almost gets Ryan's dad sucked into the vacuum of space (I don't suppose there was another space race out there in that supernova, ready to bail him out?). Like most NuWho Doctors, Thirteen can be very self-righteous when it comes to her distaste for weapons, and very inconsistent about it. In "The Battle Of Ranskoor Av Kolos", she freely admits to Ryan that she's a hypocrite and that her rules change every week, depending on what's convenient at the time, which is annoying.
Thirteen considers herself to be an optimist, and in times of high stress, she'll try to take someone aside and give them a motivational pep talk ("The Ghost Monument", "The Tsuranga Conundrum"). She values her friends a great deal and she makes an effort to get involved in their personal lives, which ties into an arc the Doctor has had throughout the show: Nine tried to avoid 'domestics' entirely, Ten didn't mind mingling with family members, and Eleven and Twelve were both very involved in Amy and Clara's lives. Thirteen sticks around for Grace's funeral in "The Woman Who Fell To Earth", she enjoys spending time with Yaz's family in "Arachnids In The UK", and like Graham, she's a lot colder than usual to Ryan's dad on Ryan's behalf in "Resolution", for the man being such a useless deadbeat.
Thank you for this!!!!
Idk. I got nothing from her.
Ok, The Eleventh has been my second favorite Doctor until yesterday. I've been watching an "Every Doctors Ranked Worst To Best" video on youtube. I was expecting Eleventh Doctor on around third or fourth place. Then in complete surprise 11 comes in the last place. I was like WTF? I hated the video immediately. But the uploader explained why he put 11 in the last place. And it was completely spot on. At least for me. I never realized all those character errors before. Let me explain. The 11th Doctor in Series 5 was a little cruel, very much like Ninth Doctor-y characterized Doctor. But with better social skills, especially with children. A little goofy you know. His childlike attitude is what separates 11 from other Doctors. But after Series 5 the mannerism becomes too extreme. Don't get me wrong, I love being childish. I just don't like sudden change in personality. The childishness was a minor part personality in Series 5. Then in A Christmas Carol onwards it becomes the main personality of The 11th Doctor. Too much craziness came out of nowhere. If this is a character development, this happened completely off-screen just like 12th Doctor time jumps. Then some sudden dark strikes also came out of nowhere. And this dark side of The Doctor was different than the Series 5 one. It seems like they took "Old and young at the same time" thing way too seriously. I know "This is his last life and he wanted to have fun" thing. But this doesn't feel natural. This goofy childlike Doctor with dark side thing continued until the end of 11's run. I was fine with Series 6 and 7 before, but now knowing this, i find most of the scenes cringy. So what do you think about this?
I’m of the opinion that people that complain that the Doctors sometimes act out of character or a bit incompatible with how they were earlier on in their tenure forget that the Doctor is actually one single person who has been at least 13 different people.
A lot of people complain about the exact same thing with 12 when Capaldi would be leaking mannerism and personality traits from other incarnations.
And people also forget that we’re all ever changing. You’re not the exact same person you were last year. If even we ordinary and mundane people change because of silly and ordinary little things, imagine someone that has lived 13 lives and not all of them good.
Also, if you agree that 12’s characterisation came out of nowhere, then I recommend paying closer attention. Everything is there on screen, on the smallest details. From him doing a “boo gesture” to Clara in “Into the Dalek” from him being really competitive with Robin Hood and challenging the universe in order to save Clara to him throwing a 3 week party in the Middle Ages with a tank and a guitar and dying in a coat with red inseam and flamboyant cuffs. Those are all traits from past incarnations.
I always loved seeing mannerisms of past doctors leak through
11 is also my least favourite. I don't hate him. Matt Smith is excellent. I just love the others more. But I love every Doctor, which makes ranking them so far. Also I think I know which video you watched because I saw someone put 11 last and make that exact argument.
A lot of statements here that just aren't true and give nothing to support them.
>Then in A Christmas Carol onwards it becomes the main personality of The 11th Doctor. Too much craziness came out of nowhere.
No it doesn't.
>this happened completely off-screen just like 12th Doctor time jumps
12s character development is almost entirely on screen and if you can't see that it explains the rest of the post.
>Then some sudden dark strikes also came out of nowhere.
No it doesn't.
>And this dark side of The Doctor was different than the Series 5 one.
No it's not.
>But this doesn't feel natural
Yes it does.
>So what do you think about this?
Guess.
Hard agree
I personally really love Eleven (always have done), and the old soul behind the flamboyant exterior is really why, I found there to be a good level of silly and dark.
I was surprised to find a lot of people, on Youtube and Reddit, who feel his character went through too much flanderization in series 6 and 7 (too much hand waving and silliness), where I did notice it increase a bit it did not bother me, it was just Eleven fully developing.
My point being you were fine to love/like him before for whatever reasons you did and shouldn't feel forced to change your mind because of some Youtube opinions, however your opinion changing is also completely valid too if you do agree with the points from those videos and I can see where the points are coming from (although I don't agree with them).
Be for-warned some people will definitely take "negativity" towards 11 badly and tell you your opinion is wrong even though it is an opinion which you are allowed.
>This goofy childlike Doctor with dark side thing continued until the end of 11's run.
But this is exactly why I love the 11th Doctor? The old man in a young man's body was executed perfectly by the stories and by Matt Smith's performance.
11 has shades of 2 and 4 but also 7 in him. His goofiness and childishness are sometimes genuine but are also a wishful façade. He wants to be young at heart but it is covering a deeper darkness in him that has come with his old age. He has deeply hidden rage hidden under the surface and can give in to anger and manipulation at times.
It's not as apparent in series 5 but even in his second episode he says "Nobody human has anything to say to me today!" And it's natural that this becomes more apparent in series 6 and even more after he loses the Ponds in mid-series 7, despite knowing the danger he puts them it.
And this doesn't go unexplored. The series 5 finale sees the his enemies work together to lock him away in a personal prison. A Good Man Goes to War is obviously an exploration of this. The Colonel Runaway scene is fabulous as we see the Doctor is so desperate to save Amy that he gives into deep-seated anger that makes him unnecessarily humiliate the Colonel. And at the end when he fails, River chews him out for his hubris. We also see him recognize that he's gotten too well-known for his own good and deletes information about himself
> The Colonel Runaway scene is fabulous as we see the Doctor is so desperate to save Amy that he gives into deep-seated anger that makes him unnecessarily humiliate the Colonel
It wasn't unnecessary.
> Colonel Runaway. Those words, "run away." I want you to be famous for those exact words. I want people to call you "Colonel Runaway." And when people come to you and ask if trying to get to me through the people I love... is in any way a good idea, I want you to tell them your name.
He makes an example of the man. Quite cold bloodedly and more than a little cruel into the bargain, but it's definitely for a reason.
2, 4, and 7 .... yes!!!
2,11, and 12
So I didn’t include the word ”Rani” in the title because that would negate the whole point of the spoiler tag lol…
anyway, about THE RANI:
I’ve always really liked her as a character, and i’m so glad she’s back. Even though the leaks obnoxiously turned out to be true (I would’ve much preferred if Mrs. Flood was related to the gods or something instead) I’m okay with it.
like many other fans on here, I have been eagerly awaiting the return of The Rani for years, because I find her to be one of those unique time lord characters we used to get in the classic series (like The Meddling Monk) that we haven’t seen again since! I would have much preferred if her return was more subtle, and not this whole Mrs. Flood overplayed mystery box thing but whatever, at least it’s finally over now lol.
Now, here’s the point of my post: I hope to GOD they don’t just make her out to be another Master clone…
her characterization is super important! she’s a cunning, manipulative, calculative strategist whose only ever on one person’s side - herself! I know there is some thematic overlap with her and The Master, but the key difference here is artistic intention I think! by that I mean that The Master is evil because he’s intended to be evil. He’s evil because he enjoys being evil (as written.) whereas The Rani’s evil is a slightly different breed… she’s evil because she just doesn’t care about the lives of the subjects of her experiments. She’s actually vastly more neutral, especially in The Mark of the Rani - where we first meet her (I hope they bring back her Tree-transformation land mine things lol, that could be fun! and existential…)
This is a level of nuanced moral ambiguity that I think personally sets her apart from most other villains, because it highlights the fact that she is only ever acting as a villain due to her alignment in the two (technically 3) stories we’ve had with her so far. It’s only by the circumstances of the stories she’s in that she happens to be antagonistic for that story respectively.
above all else, she’s a scientist; morality out the window - ethics never concerned her. she only wants to see her experiments to the end, and if any given experiment coincidentally happens to morally align with the protagonist then for that hypothetical story she could even be a force of good.
it’s a moral grey area that deserves its own spotlight, and that’s why I hope she isn’t just another Master or Missy. it would be pointless to have another character play the exact same role as the master… might as well just bring back the master again at that point. we’ll see how this all plays out, but that’s how i’m feeling about that right now.
let me know what you all think!
This whole obsession with The Doctor and his companions is very atypical for The Rani. The lack of a personal relationship with him is one of the things that made her different from The Master.
Given some of her lines, I'm hoping it turns out to be more of an interest in the vindicators and they lean heavily into her nature as an amoral scientist.
I'm not sure why one of them seemed immediately happy to be subservient to the other. Looking forward to seeing how it plays out at least.
>The lack of a personal relationship with him is one of the things that made her different from The Master.
That was before the time war. It makes sense they'd go for a more personal relationship when there's less than a dozen timelords left in the universe.
Personal enough for her to spend her time cosplaying as his various companions throughout history?
It seems weird and out of character. She was entirely focused on gaining knowledge and completely unconcerned with others. She looked down on antics like that as a trivial waste of time.
I can buy that this version is different, a different time, a different regeneration. But I do question why you would bring back a character only to fundamentally change who they are, what they do, and how they think.
Giving her an obsession with the Doc just makes her another master, and considering we've already had a really good female master, we can't rely on that distinction in the modern age.
Giving her a repeated and obvious motif of fourth wall breaking is equally as bizarre, not something she's ever done before, yet very nearly defines her as a character in this version.
I'm trying to withhold judgement until we've seen this story play out, but as it stands, I don't get the choice. If I was going to bring back The Rani, I'd have her act like The Rani. Wouldn't that be the entire point of bringing her back in the first place?
I actually wonder if The Rani's goals are well intended--in that she wants to bring back Gallifray wholesale, with all the Time Lords, but is completely willing to sacrifice the Earth in order to do so.
My two theories about this:
The Earth exploding was from Rani's experiment going wrong. She too is locked out of returning. She is following the Doctor and his Vindicator plan to piggy back off him and use his interference to get to re-do her experiment without the error that blows up the Earth. She doesn't care about the Earth, she just wants to continue her experiment.
The Vindicators working properly will let her get back to Gallifrey before the Master killed all the Time Lords. She wants this for some reason.
I said this in r/gallifrey, but I think that the way the Rani acts at the end of the episode is a good sign she won’t just be The Master But Different. If it was the Master getting revived and bigenerating at the end I feel like that, as he’s written in NuWho at least, he’d have went and killed Mike and Gary for shits and giggles. The Rani just kind of said “alright I’ve got evil schemes going on out of my way.”
True, a second version of the Master would also never be submissive to the first, if the Master bigenerated and the new one tried that they would get killed immediately lol
Oh yeah, she's different, that is one reason she is interesting.
For example, she could decide to end all illness and disease on a planet or even turn that planet into a perfect utopia.
On another planet she could want to make a virus that would wipe out every living thing inc animal and plant life.
Both to her would be exactly the same
Belinda is an experiment created by Mrs. Flood/The Rani to follow The Doctor and enable bi-generation for other Time Lords.
Belinda has false memories implanted of parents which is why we never see them.
The Rani could always use a spare pair of hands so she’s planted the seeds of tri-generation within Belinda to create The Unholy Trinity but the blast from Belinda destroys Earth. /s
>Belinda has false memories implanted of parents which is why we never see them.
Why would we see them? She doesn't live with them, she leaves Earth in episode 1 and can't get back, they're not characters in the story. Doesn't mean they don't exist
Belinda has false memories implanted of parents which is why we never see them.
Funny because this would've worked so much better with Ruby and her quest to find her parents.
That episode had so many twists especially Susan being in it, but yes i really hope the ‘new’ rani isn’t just a master rewrite
War Doctor: This Tardis looks bland, colorless, unsafe, and rusty it gives off the feeling of looking at a weapon which matches the war doctors aesthetic as he is a warrior. Unlike most Tardises in new who this is the only Tardis without soul and this represents how the war doctor as symbolically the war doctor isn’t the doctor is just a war criminals Tardis. This isn’t the doctors Tardis it’s his Tardis.
9-10: This one looks like the war doctors but older, a little more colorful and bigger which represents the doctor trying to improve and even redeem on his past by changing the present yet he can’t he can’t forgive or forget his past which is why it looks so similar to the war doctor because the doctor can’t forget what he’s done. This sense of danger also fits the 9th and 10th as they are the most dangerous as this is still the war doctors Tardis but remade.
The 11th doctor (series 5 - 6): This one is more colorful and feels like a home a safe place but underneath the console is a mechanical and blue reminiscent of the blue color of the 9th and 10th doctors Tardis. This to me represents how no matter how goofy and fun this version of the Doctor looks he’s still dangerous and dark underneath the goofy persona
The 12th Doctor (Series 8-10): This version looks both safe and dangerous. It’s mysterious, an enigma, which fits the doctors mysterious and enigmatic character throughout his initial appearance as he is unpredictable and mysterious you don’t know if he’s saving you or using you, an example being how he used Ross trust to trick him into taking tracker so that when he died they could use it to track the antibodies to the stomach (Episode: Into The Dalek) he doesn’t know if he himself is a good man or bad man hence his iconic “Clara am I good man”
War doctor's reminds me of like bone or dying coral. But as he came back around and grew, the coral began to feel the love of life again and started to blossom again as 9/10's console room.
9/10 actually looks a lot like a dalek which really hits home with the episode dalek basically calling him one too
Also worth noting that the 12th Doctor's TARDIS is actually the one the 11th Doctor switched to when he was mourning the loss of Amy and Rory.
He switched from the whimsical design of his original to a darker, more serious TARDIS.
It fits even better when you remember that 11’s second interior wasn’t exactly the same as 12’s—it had a greener color scheme, and no bookshelves iirc. It was definitely the most sterile and alien of the interiors at the time, and it’s kinda surprising how few changes needed to happen to make it the most inviting, at least in my view.
I love 12's, probably my favourite TARDIS design - warm and cosy, while still with a bit of the 'this is a spaceship control room' feel from the classic designs. 11's second one is too cold, it's my least favourite design, despite being the same set!
True, it doesn't look exactly the same, but it is the same set with modifications.
Everyone calls War's TARDIS soulless or bland even though it's a mix of 5/6/7's and 9/10's. I personally love the white TARDIS look and don't find it bland at all. The newest interior is my second favorite, beaten only by 12's. The 80s interior is third place though
Interesting analysis.
What would you say for 13 and 14/15’s interiors?
I like your analysis. The 11th Doctors first Console room is my favorite. At times to me 11:felt like a perfect balance of 9s Rage, 10s cheerful laid back energy and his own childlike whimsy.
doctor who character analysis
Key Considerations for Doctor Who Character Analysis
The Doctor:
Companions:
Villains:
Themes:
Takeaways:
Recommendation: For a deeper understanding, consider watching episodes that highlight character arcs, such as "Blink" (for the Doctor's moral dilemmas), "The Girl in the Fireplace" (for companion dynamics), and "The End of Time" (for the Doctor's regeneration and legacy).
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.