Overall Reception
"The Sinner" has been generally well-received, with many viewers expressing surprise and delight at its quality. The film is praised for being a refreshing take on the vampire genre, combining elements of horror, drama, and art [3]. One reviewer described it as a "breath of fresh air" that reignited their faith in the entertainment industry
[3]. Despite some criticisms, the film is recommended by several viewers who appreciated its unique approach
[5:1].
Vampire Elements and Themes
The film's portrayal of vampires has been noted for its depth and nuance. Reviewers have highlighted the working-class depiction of vampires and the exploration of themes such as community and belonging [4:1]. The character of Remmick, in particular, is seen as a complex figure whose actions can be interpreted as both self-serving and driven by a desire for community
[4:2],
[4:6]. Some viewers appreciated the film's exploration of cultural assimilation and identity through the lens of vampirism
[4:8].
Cinematography and Sound Design
The film's cinematography and sound design have also received praise. Viewers have noted the masterful use of music and visuals to enhance the storytelling [5:4]. The sound design, in particular, is highlighted as award-worthy, with one scene reportedly taking months to plan
[5:7].
Criticisms and Mixed Opinions
While the film has garnered positive reviews, there are some mixed opinions. A few viewers felt that the story dragged in parts and that the characters lacked depth [3:9],
[3:12]. Additionally, some critics pointed out that the film relied on familiar vampire tropes, though others argued that these were effectively integrated into the broader narrative
[3:2].
Recommendation for Non-Vampire Fans
For those not typically interested in vampire movies, "The Sinner" is still recommended due to its focus on themes of family, belonging, and transcendence beyond the vampire elements [5:2]. The film is considered a complete experience even without its supernatural aspects, making it appealing to a broader audience
[5:4].
Ok but that wasnāt the point of the post. He was up on a panel. I canāt remember if it was Heidiās or somebody elseās saying all these people are sending him stuff about Gen from different communities. Iām pretty sure we know she isnāt that freaking popular and this proves heās the one going around trying to get people and other communities to talk about what heās talking about. Heās a weirdo
yep and then she was all upset because Shyt Show didn't kiss her ass!!
A holes! Grow up his name fits him perfectly š¤
Where does it mention Gen or Juelz? You dummy š¤£
Hmmm so is Juelz a dumb bitch as well?? Hahaha
The answer is yes
Heās not that good. Heās just an annoying liar
Correction to my typo. He proves he lied the other day saying all these communities were reaching out to him about GB when itās him going around talking about her
it's not that serious. This is a community of fucked up people so he fits right in
So awhile back I read chae nayun's side story and got to read some comments on it, on one chapter one commenter said that chae nayun and Kim hajin's romance was reminiscent of Stockholm syndrome. Stockholm syndrome is a proposed condition or theory that tries to explain why hostages sometimes develop a psychological bond with their captors. Now, I think that kinda undermines the relationship the two have in the side story.
I think one reason why people say this is because Chae Nayun regressed, but like Kim hajin did have feelings for chae nayun before she regressed, and it's not like Chae nayun is really holding him hostage to show his feelings. I don't know, maybe this is just a comment I think too much about, what do you guys think?
I also think it undermines the relationship, although I definitely can understand that viewpoint if you skim through the chapters post-reunion (thatās when the writing started to get worse)
Nayun goes from love to hate to mixed feelings to love again in an emotional roller coaster that is somewhat missable if you lose focus
I mean I donāt see it. Are they referring to the arc where chae nayun forcefully acts as hajinās bodyguard and lives with him for like a month or 2? I think the guy is just joking/exaggerating. Nayun already confessed up to this point, hajin is used to being alone in the original cube arc so having someone to genuinely bond with probably impacted what he thought of her and led to feelings growing on his end rather than Stockholm syndrome. Plus he has to come to terms with not going home unlike the original story where he had hope of going back.
I havenāt read the nayun side story in a long time though.
I don't remember which specific chapter of the ss it was. I think it was before that arc though.
Then I donāt know what they mean by Stockholm syndrome, do they mean that the fact nayun is using her future knowledge of hajin to get with him is wrong?
Or are they referring to the hold hajin has on nayunās mind based on what happened to them in the original timeline. I will admit the love nayun has for hajin is probably coupled with mental health traumaās to a small degree.
She slowly fell for hajin and even asked him out on a date during Christmas, then jinyoon died and the first person to comfort her was hajin (hugging him during the funeral), she then leaned on him in the coming months while she was in mourning such as calling him at night so she can sleep easier because his voice calms her, then only to find out hajin was the one who killed him which made nayun spiral and constantly think of him for years (even hallucinating him) in both good and bad ways. Which then led to her finding out he killed him for a noble reason causing nayunās hate to double down on love. Ok their relationship is long and a roller coaster of emotions, but she genuinely liked him before mental health came into play. Itās complex and Iām simplifying it here.
When I look at both sides of their relationship I donāt see how his comment works.
No spoilers. I saw about 300,000 reviews of this movie on this sub, thinking it was all hype and promotionā¦
And here I am. Sinners was a breath of fresh air that I needed to reignite my faith in the entertainment industry. Much like, The Substance, Sinners was a unique blend of horror, drama, and art.
I really enjoyed this movie. Great script, great acting, and just an overall outstanding movie. I would highly recommend it.
And sorry for being the 300,001st person to write a positive review. It really is a solid movie. (And like months late to the party) š š
I felt this 100,000%. I love vampires, Iāve consistently felt let down by the latest trend in Black horror, I was fully prepared to HATE this movie. Loved every second.
And there were the familiar vamp tropes, but it did feel like a great blend of drama elements as well. Probably up there (for me) with Bram Stokerās Dracula in terms of movie quality.
Edit. Tropes, but the rest of the story had me questioning if they were the bad guys or just the other sides of the same coin (with humans)ā¦after all, they were all Sinners
I think thatās what this prologue was getting after
I love vampires but was more than a bit worried when I heard about the "musical" aspect of this. This film truly blew me away. Smart heros, great set up, good gore effects, and fucking fantastic music. I can't hold out hope that the Academy will do the right thing and give Michael B. Jordan an Oscar for this movie, but he sure as hell deserves it.
Yeah the characters had more depth in dusk till dawn, sinners just felt manufactured, like it was ai written lol.
It bothered me so much that >!preacher boy has a successful music career but somehow never manages to catch the eye of other vampires over the course of decades? So his powers only happened that ONE night? !<
Yeah that was also my feeling. I wanted to see the gang successfully pull through, and see success with their barn blues club. Still enjoyed the movie but didn't like the ending.
Agreed. Enjoyed it and would rewatch it but the absolute CRAZE that followed was just not reflective of how good the movie actually was. Even still Iād probably say itās the sorta blockbuster we should strive for.. Iāll take another dozen Sinners and 28 Years Later type blockbusters thatāre thematically heavy and divisive than another Marvel blockbuster ATP.
There should have been some sort of musical/spiritual showdown between Remmick and Preacher Boy and instead they went with an action movie Avenger's assemble shoot 'em up with Michael B. Jordan.
Remmick needed to connect with his past, and Sammie could literally connect the past and the future. All of the pieces were there. All of the themes and music and emotions and everything was in place and the movie turned on the most banal part of the story.
Preacher Boy should have been able to "satisfy" Remmick's insatiableness in some way, he was constantly offering himself throughout the back half of the movie. Either by defeating him, maybe even accepting "the devil" in some way to his father's greatest fears.
Either way, the first 2/3rds were great, but were heading towards a different story than the last third showed.
you're probably a horror veteran - i wasn't impressed. started off strong but ya it dragged and the story was rather bland.
Ive seen soooooooo many horror movies many many times lol so if that counts as a veteran then ill take it. I can agree with your statement, started strong, dragged LIKE CRAZY, then me and my wife could barely finish it.
Yup. It was āmehā but we are so starved for interesting horror movies that it gets overrated. And not forgetting the blatant ripoff it is of From Dusk til Dawn.
Yeah there are a few of us - I thought it was well made but deficient in characters and plot. I do appreciate that it was different.
I was very taken by Remmickās completely legitimate invitation to Smoke, Stack, and everyone to join them in eternal fraternity.
I disagree that it was legitimate. He said what was necessary to convince people to join him. I saw Remmick more like a Jim Jones cult character with clever words. He was about his own agenda. Consider that once Smoke was a vampire, he was doing the Irish dance, something he knew nothing of and would not have done in life. He was fully assimilated into Remmickās ideology until Remmickās destruction.
Mmmm...I think it's both.
Remmick obviously wants a community and he'll do anything to get said community--or see his ancestors again. Consent be damned.
However, because of his own history and his own people being oppressed, I think he genuinely thought that what he was doing was helpful. There are parallels between Irish and Black culture and the struggles we went through. Unfortunately, this is a classic case of the cycle of abuse where the oppressed becomes the oppressor in the form of forcefully assimilating people into a vampire hivemind.
Stack was under Remmick's influence, but his monologue at Smoke was genuine. Under current society, he felt trapped. He couldn't be with Mary for fear of a., being lynched for sleeping with a white woman, or b., someone finding out that Mary had a half-black relative and killing her. He saw Remmick's "vision" and was all too happy to accept it and continued to accept it seemingly even after visiting Sammie in the '90s. (Not so much the 'fellowship and love' part, but the turning people into monsters and living forever part).
As another commenter has pointed out it's probably more nuanced than that, i.e. Remmick really missing his community but I agree with you that he is self-serving when it comes down to it. I thought his first scene, where he admits to Bert and Joan that he has abandoned his wife fleeing the Choctaw, is meant to show this. Presumably she was also a vampire, but as Remmick explains she was captured. He clearly chose to save himself from the same fate and run.
Which is why the klan members suddenly weren't racist after they became vampires. I mean...good obviously. But it's clear the thralls just adopt whatever attitude benefits Remmick. They don't maintain who they were before.
A rare working class vampire that was very refreshing. The void & pain of the vampire existence was shown beautifully through the very human desire to make & enjoy music. It touches the soul & the vampire desperately yearns to feel it again.
The hive mind moment where all the new vamps were singing Rocky Road to Dublin was peak. Extra creepy & demonstrates the depths of Remmick's control over them. Also, assuming they weren't lying, I thought it was interesting that while Remmick is the dominant personality, those he turns into vampires also influence him a little bit too. Would've loved to see a group of black vampires hunt & kill KKK members.
>Would've loved to see a group of black vampires hunt & kill KKK every member.
This would have been a better way of dealing with the Klan, actually. Have them show up during a lull in the fighting towards the end of the night, expecting to lynch the stragglers, and get their shit rocked by the vamps as a show of āgood willā insofar as they are capable of it.
The actual scene with Smoke going Rambo on them was the one misstep of the film, imo. Felt like all of a sudden Tarantino was directing it.
I kinda disagree. It felt like a moment of clawing at fate to give Smoke something good to his end. He lost almost everything that night, and he likely would have anyways even if the vampire didn't show up, so it was cathartic for him to get the drop on those who tried to get the drop on him and those he loves. And, it made sense for him to be badass given all that he and Stack had been through.
If the vampires killed the Klan, it would have morally vindicated Remmick and made a very different story.
I mostly buy the argument that Remmick represents the fear of assimilation destroying Black Culture. Becoming a vampire being a legitimate anti-Klan strategy would be the same as the hero becoming a Preacher like his dad.
Their eyes were awesome and the sharing memories is an interesting idea. Newborn vampires seem pretty weak, Remmick though who was pretty old could take a beating, even staking him didn't finish the job until the sun came out. Great dancers.
It seemed to me like the only the main vampires eyes glowed red while all the others were yellow. Wonder if it was because he was an older vampire or because he was their sire.
He played this role so well I did not recognize him at all as the main character from the movie Unbroken. Loved him in both movies. I know actors play entirely different roles in various films, but I've always been the first to say hey that's that one guy from that one movie. Not once did I pick it up, crazy.
SAMMEH
Yes, because the film is not about vampires. Vampires just happen to be in it. The film is about family, belonging, and the transcendance of being a part of something greater than the self.
Why does this have a downvote. I agree with this statement.
Saw it twice in theater, donāt leave when the credits come up!!!!!
I regret not seeing it in theaters. I did rent it but I feel like the experience would have been better at the movie theater.
When in doubt, go to the theatre
Donāt leave when you see the credits roll.. x 2
Thatās right!
Iām literally mid watch and itās fantastic. Thereās a whole movie here even without vampires, but they make it extra fun. Between the music and the masterful cinematography, this is an extremely well made film.
the sound design needs to win every award there is in the world. There's one scene that took months just to plan. and you'll know it when it happens.
There are TWO after credits scenes.
Yes, sir. I just watched it last night and it is a fantastic movie. A REAL movie. Much more than just a āvampire movieā. Really great. And do yourself a favor, watch the credits.
oh awesome thanks for letting me know!!
I didnāt like Sinners. To be clear itās not a bad movie. I loved the performances, especially from actors I didnāt think had it in them but man was a left disappointed. There was something about the structure of the story that through me off.
I enjoyed the first half of the movie which is surprising because I hate slave/black struggle movies. But once it truly turned into a horror movie is when I think the movie fell apart and was trying to do so many things at the same time and it didnāt work for me.
Yo...I'm reading these comments and...you're getting off really easy. Folks DESTROYED me just for saying I didn't like the one musical scene. Just the one scene! š But yeah, I feel you. While I really enjoyed it, I def think it's overhyped. I have a lot of theories on the reasoning but that's not why we're here. We're here to tell you...you're definitely being judged and these fools in these comments are lying. š
I was not expecting so many people to agree with me. I guess the hype has died down enough where people can actually get their negative opinions out and not get killed for it lol. But yeah judge away, I get it.
Haha. I think the way folks are acting in here now is how they should always act. You weren't disrespectful...you didn't attack anyone for enjoying it...you just stated how you felt. I dunno why some folks are so threatened by that. But I totally get what you're saying. I think the second half worked for me cuz I love goofy b-level horror movies and I feel like that's what Couglar was shooting for. But I can 100% see that style not working for a lot of people! I think, with me, I'm also just excited to see more black folks in horror in general...even if we're always relegated to "look for the message" styles.
C Town is here. How do you submit suggestions for your Out of My Element stuff on your channel?
I'll give my choices here: Pulp "More" and McClusky (their new album. OUTSTANDING)
Sinners is very good and Ryan's 4th best movie.
Have you seen Bring Her Back? Really interested in your opinion on that Horror movie. I've heard that it's gross AF.
THANKS.
Ever since I got rid of my Patreon (cus I couldn't keep up with fulfilling it and didn't wanna keep taking people's money) I got rid of people being able to choose and vote. But I still take suggestions. I'm very familiar with Pulp so I dunno that that would work. Not familiar with McClusky so I'll add that! But I already have one scripted out that I think a lot of folks will find wild.
I recently spoke to someone who just watched the movie last week for the first time and they didn't like it either. They went into the movie blind and hadn't watched any of the trailers but they did say the film felt all over the place and the actors didn't portray the south in an authentic way. They even had an issue with some of the musical performances which surprised me but overall I think their criticism was valid.
Having had time to sit with the movie after a few months the hype did make it feel like it was the movie of the year but in hindsight it's super aight.
I canāt attest to the accents as Iām not from there, I thought they sounded good but Iām ignorant on that subject.
But the attempt to connect Sammyās soulful blues to all the different eras of black music was big miss for me lol. I think itās a cool unique concept on paper but on screen seeing guys crip walk and girls twerk to a weird amalgnation to all those sounds was on unironically funny.
Tell me what other block buster type film has come out this year with beautiful cinematography, a great lead actor and supporting cast, compelling plot, good action, AND has a message. What director has the ability to pull that off??!
That's fair. I think why I liked it is honestly because I wasn't expecting much. I saw the trailer on accident and knew about the horror movie aspect and nowadays I really dont like knowing shit before I watch. Because the movie still came off as enjoyable to me I respect it.
Thatās true, and was delaying watching it because the hype got so big for this movie. And for the first half of this movie I was pleasantly enjoying myself and completely understood the hype. The second half is where it fell apart for me in some areas but enough to leave me disappointed.
Hey man Iām not judging for not liking No Country For Old Men.
I had to ask lol judge away
The movie was just okay for me until the epilogue happened. That's when I realized If you take out the whole vampires thing, it's pretty much the biopic of a musician who chose to follow his dreams after a life-changing experience. And Ryan Coogler nailing it with the emotional flashbacks at that moment made me understand what the film was really about. Really enjoyed the songs and the dancing but everything that happened 3/4 of the way in felt too rushed. Also Sammie playing after the credits was a nice nod to the music biopic genre
A criticism I had of the film - from a Horror fan perspective - was that it wouldāve been more effective to have the mystery slowly unravel as to the true nature of the āafflicted.ā I loved the scenes with the musicians first interacting with smoke/stack, but itās somewhat undercut by the fact the audience knows what threat they pose. I think it wouldāve been far more menacing to have had them seem charming but a bit āoffā and then played out the dilemma about letting them in with the audience being brought along on that ride with the characters. I also thought it undercut the mystery further to have it straight up called out that these are vampires and then kick in the usual tropes about how to kill them which happened within a good minute or so.
In that era white people are a violent threat, vampires or not. There was no way they could have been played as innocents. The suspense is that they were known to be dangerous but not exactly how dangerous.
I understand that. I am not suggesting they shouldāve been played as innocents throughout the film. I am suggesting that our protagonists should have uncovered the āvampiricā nature of the strangerās alongside rather than after the audience. That still allows for justified suspicions about letting the strangers in, but adds greater suspense and would hit twice as hard when we realise the true magnitude of what theyāve done rather than knowing exactly how itās going to play out. Like I said, preference from a horror fan perspective.
Itās a fair point that a deliberate labelling of the strangers as vampires makes very obvious that they arenāt the real threat in the Jim Crow era. I suppose I already assumed that this would be obvious for any non-native supernatural threat, though. So as a viewer I was hoping for a little more mystery.
I really feel like there was some interest on the part of the director of just having a movie about the twins for as long as possible I'm turning it into some sort of crime epic. What a waste of great presence and chemistry. It really seems they had to reel in Michael b Jordans role to make the film work as horror. Though it started slow,I still feel like there was so much that was alluded to,but still wanted more. Btw if you are a movie fan and the Irish folk song sounded familiar it was at also the end of Sherlock Holmes:game of Shadows.
I just finished watching this film an hour ago and it was 100% not what I expected at all but I think it was absolutely brilliant. The ending made me appreciate the journey Sammie went on even more.
Loved it! Went in blind and at the beginning I was wondering where the hell was the horror until it started.
To me it was a 30's version of From Dusk til Dawn.
Coogler was apparently inspired by Dusk til Dawn and also The Faculty!
I would add some 30 days of night and some Bailey's
Itās a horror film but itās unconventional, a bit like The Witch. Huge setup, relatively small payoff, and more about the journey rather than the destination! It had elements of a ton of genres which I can see putting off a lot of people. I loved it though, I just appreciate someone trying something new with quite a bloated genre.
disagree that the witch had a small payoff
The witch and the is movie arenāt even close to the same as far as payoff. The hell you talking about lol
I liked the beginning and the music, but the stuff was not my cup of tea.
Abandon any preconceived notion of what this movie is about. It is not about vampires. It is not a horror movie. It is a movie about culture, Black culture, Irish culture, American culture. It is a movie about Music, and soul, southern blues and Irish folk. It is a movie about people taking things that isn't theirs, and people sharing gifts that are. It is a movie about community, the ties that bind, and the breaking of bonds.
If poetry doesn't sell you, it's a movie about a black owned juke joint in 1930s Mississippi, and the strength of community, featuring vampires.
The casting is great, the music is great, the story is great. Watch the damn movie.
Absolute agreement with everything you said OP.
Watch it right the fuck now, Mommy says you have to. I'll even give you a personalized "good girl" when you prove you have.
I'm mostly commenting so this gets more engagement and gets more views. That's how badly I want more of you to see this movie. You've made Mommy interact with the algorithm, now go watch it
I ain't watchin' a movie with those goddamn *r*sh in it. What am I, a Catholic?
>! I'll watch it, okay, jeez !<
I've been told the Potato Eater dies in the end. I'll give it a go.
SOMEBODY TAKE MEEEEEE
IN YOUR AAAARRRRRMMMMSSS!!!
NEW SHIT PREACHER BOY SAMMIE MOORE
And also a not-so-subtle nod to the sheer racism that existed back then and fighting that back.
Due to an uptick in posts that invariably revolve around "look what this transphobic or racist asshole said on twitter/in reddit comments" we have enabled this reminder on every post for the time being.
Most will be removed, violators will be shot temporarily banned and called a nerd. Please report offending posts. As always, moderator discretion applies since not everything reported actually falls within that circle of awful behavior.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Thereās so much stuff online about this movie being great, I can safely say it 100% lives up to the hype. The acting, sets, and especially the music are amazing. Just youāre run of the vampire movie it is not. It definitely earns the 97 critic and audience rotten tomatoes rating and I would recommend it to anyone in DGG who likes horror, blues music, or good movies.
Iād give it a 7 or 8 out of ten tbh.
I feel like the final act lets the movie down. It does a great job setting up the conflict, but doesnāt quite land the finish. Also some of the historical social commentary symbolism was a bit on the nose.
But overall, still a great movie that Iād recommend, high quality stuff.
Felt the same way as you honestly. I really believe this movie didnāt need vampires at all, and a lot of weird and silly things started happening once they made the genre switch.
The first hour and 10 minutes were so good that they shouldāve kept it that way. Just make it a historical drama/action/musical.
The biggest disappointment for me was the hype though. People told me it would be the best vampire movie Iāve ever seen and that Iāve never seen an actor play twins like Jordan does here. A perfect 10/10 movie. When I hear 10/10, I expect something like Interstellar, 12 angry men, or The Dark Knight. This doesnāt get close to any of those.
This is also not even close to the best twin acting Iāve ever seen. Tom Hardy in Legend is absolutely insane. If you donāt know who Tom Hardy is or the premise of that movie before watching it, you most likely wonāt realize itās the same actor for the twins until about 30 minutes in, thatās how good he was.
Overall, itād give this a solid 7, maybe an 8. If they had stayed away from the horror genre entirely and kept cooking like they did with the first half, itās undeniably a 9 for me.
Everything up until the vampires was damn near perfect. The movie does a good job of immersing the viewer into the world of the movie. There are a bunch of interesting conflicts that each character is involved in, allowing the viewer to connect with everyone on screen to one extent or another. It feels like there are a bunch of spinning plates just waiting to fall. But unfortunately, the resolution to these conflicts is woefully disappointing.
I was hoping that the vampires were gonna be used in some interesting/unique way, but it all feels so generic. Not to mention the ham-fisted cultural critique metaphor they tried to shove on top of that. Maybe I need to watch it again or think about it more, but the whole metaphor felt shallow/trite. The vampires just feel like such an awkward narrative tool in the context of what we'd already seen in the movie.
This shit was so good, watched it over the weekend and itās easily the most creative movie made this decade.
My only issue with the movie is that it was hard to understand some dialogue, I've talked to people with a deep accent but still struggled at times with the movie
Okay so it wasn't just me š
I'm British so I just chalked it up to just never really ever being exposed to that accent.
You could still tell what was going on and get the gist of what people were saying thankfully. I also don't think it was so bad a bit later on?
Absolutely loved it though.
Growing up in the south myself, I knew after 10 min that so many people were gonna have issues understanding the dialogue. I missed a bunch of it myself.
If destiny hates it, it's a must watch.
I guarantee you destiny hates this movie
Great movie very fresh
Not even Steve could dislike this film
That movie is so much better than Sinners.
Hey y'all -
Just a note because I haven't seen anything about it on here or elsewhere.
The new movie Sinners with Michael B Jordan has a subplot that may be hard for some of us. It's not graphic or violent, but includes a storyline of a baby that passed.
A friend warned me ahead of time and it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be, but I certainly cried at both points the topic appeared (in the beginning as you meet characters, and then again toward the end.)
Hope this helps! Be gentle with yourselves this week. š
I have been looking for anyone talking about this and I thought I was completely alone. My partner and I went to see it and we both cried multiple times. I held his hand so tight. We lost our daughter when I was 22 weeks pregnant. She was still born. Still a phenomenal movie, just could have used the content warning
Our first pregnancy was a miscarriage in 2016. The ended was so so hard for me to watch. I'm glad I wasn't the only one.
Thank you so so much for the heads up on this; we had planned to go and see more movies together in the weeks we will take off work, and this was top of the list.
I meant to share something about this, thank you. My husband and I went to see Sinners as a distraction - what could there possibly be problematic with a vampire movie set a hundred years ago? I had seen Warfare, which, albeit violent, hadnāt bothered me at all. But phew, Sinners was a good movie, but the scene at the end had both of us openly weeping in the theatersā¦
Yep. I cried tears of joy that they could finally be with their baby š„². Iām tearing up now thinking about it actually lol.
What are early reviews saying about The Sinner
Key Considerations for Early Reviews of "The Sinner":
Plot and Themes: Reviewers often highlight the show's intriguing and complex narrative structure, focusing on psychological themes and character development. The exploration of morality and human behavior is frequently praised.
Performance: The performances, particularly by Bill Pullman as Detective Harry Ambrose, receive significant acclaim. Critics note the depth and nuance he brings to the character.
Pacing and Tone: Some reviews mention the show's slow burn pacing, which may not appeal to all viewers. However, many appreciate the tension and suspense that builds over time.
Visual Style: The cinematography and overall visual aesthetic are often commended, contributing to the show's moody atmosphere.
Character Depth: Reviewers appreciate the depth of the characters, with many noting that the show takes time to explore their backstories and motivations.
Takeaways:
Recommendation: If you enjoy character-driven dramas with psychological elements and are patient with pacing, "The Sinner" is likely worth watching.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.