TL;DR
Jaguar F-Pace
The Jaguar F-Pace is frequently mentioned as a standout model in Jaguar's SUV lineup. It is described as a rebadged Range Rover Velar but without the same level of prestige [2:3]. Despite this, the F-Pace has been noted for being profitable and well-received, particularly in its SVR form, which is considered best in class by some enthusiasts
[4:3],
[4:10].
Market Position and Competition
Jaguar SUVs are generally seen as middle-of-the-road luxury vehicles. They do not necessarily match up to the prestige or reliability of German competitors like BMW or Mercedes [2:1],
[2:5]. The brand has struggled with identity issues, trying to compete in segments dominated by more established names
[2:1]. This has impacted their market share, especially in the SUV segment where Land Rover, a sister brand, is more dominant
[4:1].
Design and Appeal
While Jaguar's design language has been praised, there have been mixed feelings about the direction the brand has taken. Some users lament the loss of traditional elements like wood interiors, which they believe gave Jaguar a unique edge over competitors [4:9]. The F-Pace, however, continues to be appreciated for its aesthetics and driving experience, making it a popular choice among those who favor Jaguar's style
[4:3].
Reliability and Value
One of the criticisms of Jaguar SUVs, including the F-Pace, is their reliability and high maintenance costs [2:6]. Depreciation is also a concern, making them a less attractive option compared to more reliable and value-retaining competitors
[2:6]. For buyers considering long-term ownership, these factors may weigh heavily against choosing a Jaguar SUV.
Conclusion
For those interested in a Jaguar SUV, the F-Pace, particularly in its SVR variant, is often recommended for its blend of performance and style. However, potential buyers should be mindful of the brand's challenges with reliability and depreciation, and consider whether the unique appeal of a Jaguar outweighs these concerns.
My personal take
XJ with 2.7 diesel
Did jaaaaaag ever make a v8 diesel variant
Unfortunately, Jaguar got the cuck chair, and the V8 diesel was Land Rover only.
I'd argue it would have to be their sports cars from the late '40s until the late '60s. From XK120 up to the E-type they consistently delivered incredibly capable, fast and good looking cars at prices vastly below their direct competitors. As much as I like their later cars, they never hit that same competitive advantage again.
The XK was also an amazing engine. One of the few that is both reliable and British.
There’s more reliable ones, but this is one of the few that is also relatively powerful as well.
a older Riced X-Type with rusted bumpers
The bumpers (and grille) on an X-Type are made of plastic, they cannot rust. The worst rust points are the sills, which have plastic covers that hide the rust.
On a side note, I take it the very specific X-Type you're imagining is beige or "2000s silvery blue" with manual cloth seats, 16 inch steel wheels, keep-fit rear windows, no options, and the 2.0 diesel?
Gr.1? You mean that’s raceable alongside group c in Gran Turismo?
Best jaguar is the Marine
I have some basic knowledge in cars but I’m still learning do Jaguars have nice SUV’s or not worth it?
The only Jag worth a shit compared to the competition right now is the F type.
The F-Pace is a rebadged Range Rover Velar without the prestige. They are pretty unreliable and really not worth the money against the German rivals.
Damn thx for the input
I would call them a middle-of-the-road luxury brand. Are they they nicest? Probably not. The worst? Probably not.
Honestly Jaguar suffered horribly under a lack of direction and investment when Ford owned it in the '00s. The brand really took a nosedive. Since then Ford sold them, they've done an admirable job improving their quality and engineering, but they still suffer somewhat from a lack of identity. Are they supposed to be a sporty luxury brand (a la, Porsche)? A mainstream luxury brand (a la, Mercedes)? Difficult to pin them down. But because of their poor positioning, they are often an overlooked luxury brand. But that's not to say they make bad cars - they're a helluva lot better than they were 15 years ago. If you like how they look, take one for a test drive and see what you think.
So which Jag screwed you, the X-type or the S-type?
🔥💪 Im not at the time to buy still haha but I will possibly Im the future let’s see. Thx you for the input bro
Just better SUV's out there for the money.
Excessive maintenance costs and depreciation make these a poor value.
I mean a classic e-type is arguably the best looking jag ever and one of the best looking cars ever
I prefer the gen 3 over the original e type and I also find types of the coupe strange looking, the roadster is beautiful though
For sure, s3 ots on steel wheels ftw!
The roaster is great; the coupe is amazing in 2015
As a former F-Type owner who is also biased, I’m gonna have to disagree with you this one
It’s kind of cheating, because only a few hundred were made, but this is the correct answer. My favorite supercar design of all time.
I own a F Type R, but the E-Type is my future old man drive around town on the weekend retirement car. It's beautiful.
I might be biased too, I think the XKR is the best looking modern-day Jaguar.
We love the looks of our XKR-S, an absolutely beautiful car, moving sculpture!
Unlike the e type I’m not sure how good it looks as a convertible
Always look back at my F-Type after I park it. That’s the measure of a car’s beauty
Hear me out: They should have built on the brand image they created with this ad - this was peak Jaguar in the 21st century.
They screwed up during this same era by trying to make the XF compete against BMW and Audi in the mid-size performance segment - they hoped to move the XF and XE in large volume; this was NEVER going to work.
They also tried to get into the British SUV space, of course - this was another disaster because as it turns out Land Rover has dominated that segment for about 100 years and continues to do so. My suggestions:
There. I fixed it.
Sexy ad. I’m sad about the brand’s direction. Jaguar was never supposed to be a mass consumption vehicle. I think that’s the mistake they’ve made. Trying to compete with Mercedes and BMW which, to me, are common. They should’ve studied Aston and similar to see how to make low sales volume work even at lower prices. I like that I rarely see another Jag on the street. I sincerely don’t know what I’ll do once my current girl (an XJL Portfolio) has run her course. I love the brand, but my love is hella conditional.
Uh - when you’re done with your XJL Portfolio, can I please have it? I’m in the US but I’m pretty sure I can get it shipped over here. You write like a Brit; I assume your machine is right-hand drive?
The F-pace is the only jag that made a profit for decades, and in SVR form its absolutely best in class.
We had an SVR for 4 years and it was maybe my favorite car we’ve ever owned. Did everything so well.
Sorry but America’s women disagreed - the F-Pace is magnificent but the deciding demographic in US SUV sales is affluent suburban women. They fixated on Land Rover, not Jaguar, if they were considering a British SUV. Jaguar made money off of every F-Pace sold, but there was not enough room in this market niche for both Jaguar and Land Rover. For this reason the new Type 00 concept is a sedan, not an SUV. Land Rover has chased Jaguar off this patch.
Absolutely missed the point with this. No one was buying the cars. So for all the “great” adverts, it wasn’t working.
Wasn't working? JLR's best ever sales years were 2014/15 (469,209 vehicles sold, of which 76,930 were Jaguar cars, the rest Land Rovers) and 2015/16 (487,065/83,986), So it was most certainly working when this advert was current!
They also tried to get into the British SUV space, of course - this was another disaster because as it turns out Land Rover has dominated that segment for about 100 years and continues to do so.
Jaguar and Land Rover are the same company. The F-Pace was Jaguar's best-selling vehicle, reaching 56,563 units in 2018, a year in which Jaguar sold 180,833 cars. The F-Pace is the only Jaguar vehicle remaining in production.
JLR had their best year in a decade in 2024/5 in terms of profits (£2.5bn) despite the halt in the production of Jaguar cars (apart from the F-Pace). 2025/6 will be a lot more challenging thanks to tariffs (US exports were temporarily halted) and the latest hacking event, which has caused the shutdown of all of their factories.
Whatever the wisdom of Jaguar's realignment to an electric future, the overall company is doing very well.
I want them to reinvent themselves, and I want them to be both clever and brave. I have no problem with a sedan that runs on electrified propulsion - that’s all quite promising. But: I don’t think they should abandon the best aspects of their traditional design language, and I don’t think they should go all in on electric propulsion. I think a plug-in hybrid approach would let them move into a space where there is the maximum amount of room for innovation and a maximized opportunity to create distinctive, unique, and appealing cars. As a lot of people have said around here, Jaguar has nothing to lose - so the best approach is to go after a goal that is truly challenging and will produce vehicles with really robust, unique and appealing qualities.
I think one area where Jaguar goofed was reducing or eliminating the wood from the interior. It's much classier than plastic.
I agree absolutely. Jaguar was previously able to provide the interior experience of a Bentley but in a machine that was going to be more reliable, would have a sportier, sexier, more youthful vibe, and would cost far less. Once the wood was gone, and the four-headlight design language was gone, Jaguar was in the same “black plastic” universe with all of the competition - this was a terrible move.
EV’s will be forced on a lot of people, sooner or later. It could be government regulation or it could be the rising costs of fossil fuel. Jaguar actually went all electric because their hand was forced by UK policies (which were inconveniently backtracked later on). Also, FYI, if you’re American like me then our perspective of EV’s is skewed. The rest of the world is adopting them at a much quicker rate.
So there’s definitely a market there, and it’s not already dominated by the Germans. The I-pace is actually credited as one of the first premium brand EV’s to get the formula right. So Jaguar actually knows a thing or two about this and has a good start.
This is how I see it: Currently, I have zero interest in any EV on the market. But in the back of my mind I know I might need to make the switch… someday. If/when the time comes, being able to get a Jag will make the “transition” easier.
Fully agree that electrified propulsion is the future, but I’m not sure about all-electric as the best option for Jaguar. There’s no good way to succeed as a global car brand without the US market, and the distances in cities and between cities in the US are simply colossal when compared with Europe. All-electric vehicles will be a tough sell in the US for decades, if not permanently.
In addition you can just look at the opinion polls in the UK - within a few years you’ll have a right-wing populist regime there just like the one in the US. Any requirements around electric propulsion are very likely to be scrapped as soon as the next parliament is in place. I’m not happy about that at all - don’t get me wrong. But we do seem to be in an era where there is a resurgence of populism as a political phenomenon, and I’m not aware of any populists anywhere on earth who are connecting with their part of the electorate by promoting electrified propulsion and banning liquid-fueled engines.
So a plug-in hybrid approach might be the best of both worlds - a technology that can stay relevant as Europe and Asia (maybe) go electric, while also selling well in the US where “range anxiety” will continue to dominate the thinking of a very large proportion of potential buyers.
Besides - if I’m promoting a luxury brand I think I really want to be able to say “yes, this car does everything, and does it better than the cheaper vehicles that you might be considering.” A machine that only runs on one type of power source is inherently less interesting and less awesome than one that isn’t limited in this way.
Bro you’re just making up your own facts and logic lol.
> There’s no good way to succeed as a global car brand without the US market, and the distances in cities and between cities in the US are simply colossal when compared with Europe.
Peugeot, Citroën, Renault, Dacia, and that’s not including Asian brands. Plus, you’re still thinking like an “average commuter.” As if that’s who Jaguar is trying to appeal to. They’re not. They could make the perfect car based on market feedback like yours, and then it won’t sell.
> In addition you can just look at the opinion polls in the UK - within a few years you’ll have a right-wing populist regime there just like the one in the US. Any requirements around electric propulsion are very likely to be scrapped as soon as the next parliament is in place...
I live in the Midwest. Longer commutes between towns and much more conservative demographic. But I still see more and more EV’s. Teslas are as common on the road as Lexus/BMW/Audi. Rivian’s and Lucid’s went from /r/spotted material to regular traffic. Regardless of government regulation, there’s a market for people who want EV’s. Even if it’s small and they have <10% market share, that’s fine. Better, even. It’s a niche.
> So a plug-in hybrid approach might be the best of both worlds …. > Besides - if I’m promoting a luxury brand I think I really want to be able to say “yes, this car does everything, and does it better than the cheaper vehicles that you might be considering.”
Again, no. Plug in hybrids are the “practical” solution, which is basically what you’re saying. Luxury does not do practical or “bang for your buck”. Instead it solves pain points with overkill, sometimes throws crazy solutions at problems that don’t really exist. Air fresheners or febreeze? No, S-Class Mercedes solves car smells with perfume atomizers. Maybach’s solution to a dome light is starlight headliners. So when it comes to range anxiety, the correct approach would be overkill with the range. Just something ridiculous that is more than people even need.
The Excellent
Make Break Great Again
I'm not the only one erect, right...
My lawyers advised me not to say what i was about to say
I've got a full on chub right now
Nope not the only one
It's not a Cherokee, is Cherokee Swedish cousin
Volvo cherokee fucking beautiful.... doesn't even look like a wagon anymore.... that's a true suv now.
Jaguar is a premium brand, with premium pricing. But I rarely ever hear them mentioned in conversations or comparisons about premium/European cars.
So what are they good at or known for?
Jaguar has made some... odd choices recently. The XE entry level sedan was widely praised for having the best handling dynamics in the segment, but never got a proper performance trim and the interior is super cheap and underwhelming compared to the 3 series and C class.
The XF was basically left to die.
The XJ was quite nice and was very well received, and I still see a bunch on the road, but it lost the big engine and the interior never measured up to its obvious competitor - the S-Class.
The SUVs sell well and are generally well-liked, and the iPace is slowly gaining market share.
And the F-Type is still very well-regarded as a great looking, great sounding boulevard cruiser, though unfortunately it makes a pretty sub-par sports car due to weight and being horrendously under-tired and on a very old platform. It's a fantastic car and an amazing alternative to the 911 for people that don't go to the track a lot, but the lack of performance chops means people tend to overlook it. Plus they've been sticking people around for like 4 years with vague rumors about the "next" F-Type, and I think we've all caught Jaguar fatigue.
Oh, and the XE Project 8 is insane, but ludicrously priced, and super limited production.
Basically, they're kind of floundering and don't have any idea about what kind of brand they want to be.
Jaguar lost me a fair bit when they departed from the classic XJ styling to what they have now. I know understand the importance of sometimes having to start fresh and get with the times but man, I still love the way the previous (X350 according to Wikipedia) looks. Something about them just seems so perfectly statley and "British" to me.
The XE with the V6 Supercharged engine is awesome! I agree it's behind the others for interior.
The F-Type is a Luxury Scat Pack in my eyes. The engine, exhaust, and aesthetic really are the reasons to get it. The gorgeous interior is also great but visibility is rough if you are taller. It'd consider it more of an Aston Martin competitor or a LC500 alternative.
You probably mean what was Jaguar good at. They had a very unique styling and a great luxury feel, and after a bit of a rough patch reliability-wise during the 80's, they managed to create a beautiful marriage of old world class, impossibly gorgeous design, silky smooth ride, and great performance. But one day, they decided to ditch all that decades-old heritage and build the most derivative and uninteresting fleet cars for low level execs until they lost every iota of character that made the brand survive for almost a century.
I can tell you what Jaguar is NOT good at: Competing against the Germans.
I own 3 Jaguars that are in the area of age you're talking about. I could not agree more. Fantastic daily drivers that don't necessarily do well in magazine comparisons but are very easy to live with.
I could not be more jealous. 90s-00s jags are the pinnacle of the brand in my eyes.
My dad has been an XJ guy for years now. Always has one in the garage. But sadly he’s no longer interested in them and it’s precisely because they’ve lost everything that made him love them so much. After his current 06, he’s looking for a BMW to replace it.
If he's an XJ guy why does he have a 06? The last real XJ was the Series 3. This thread is full of people who don't remember what Jaguar was, they made some of the best looking affordable performance cars in the world, then they basically made garbage for a few decades until now. Everything they make now is super fat, bloated and ugly looking, the only exception is the F-Type which is very old now.
I used to be a Jaguar fan but the 80s, 90s and 2000s really killed my passion for them with all of the crap they sold with a Jaguar badge during that period. I know Jeremy Clarkson gave some of them good reviews, like the Mondeo, sorry I mean X-Type and the XJ-R but when has he ever had a valid opinion about anything honestly?
For the segment? No. Not even close. First, 380 HP is way down on power. The RS4, M3, and C63 each have at least 40hp on it. Hell, even the M2, which is a whole class smaller has more power. This is a luxury sports sedan, not an economy hot hatch. Second, the XE S just came out - 3 years ago in Europe and 2 in the US. Well after the reputation was set with the R-spec which was... underwhelming. And finally, the S is the same chassis. Which is a damn good chassis, but it should be going after the M3 and C63, and the S doesn't. It's aimed squarely at the 340i. Maybe the M340i on a good day. That's not a sports trim in the segment. That's a "slightly more sporty for people who want a comfortable commuter but want to occasionally feel like they can vroom vroom" trim.
I will say the new XE is definitely better. But it's still not quite at MB or BMW levels, though it's getting there. The problem is that it's too little too late. The reputation had been set. That and the crazy lease deals Jaguar did to get some brand recognition have devalued the brand a bit, I think. As much as I dislike Maserati, they played the comeback game much much better - the Ghibli was hot garbage when it came out, but they never devalued the brand by leasing it for cheaper than a Camry. So it maintained status and gave them time to improve the platform to match the price. Also they didn't release three levels of sedan and a sports couple at a time when sedans and sports coupes were losing sales like crazy.
That's what i like about my 19 Mazda3. I get jaguar vibes fromnthe front end.
Oh, it's for sure a fantastic alternative to the 911. That's why I got mine. But it's also a different kind of car, and is falling behind rather quickly. When it came out, it was a match for the 911 and such on pure character and "vanity" specs - the kind that seem impressive and can reasonably be accomplished by average drivers. Things like 0-60, 0-100(mph), top speed, quarter mile time. The kinds of numbers that you can reasonably show off with. And it has so much more character than the 911! But it was an objectively worse sports car in really every way. Much slower around a track, less grip, worse braking, etc.
It's still a fantastic luxury muscle car, but the 911 caught up this generation in everything but looks and sound. And the F-Type has fallen even further behind on the sports car front. It really doesn't compete against the 911 any more, if it ever really did. More like the British SL63 AMG - fast as shit in a straight line, and maneuverable enough to have fun on a back road at street speeds, but not remotely competitive on a track. They need a clean sheet redesign in order to keep it competitive, and I'm not sure Jaguar has the money for that.
Is Jaguar the Nissan of premium brands?
I haven't heard much about them, but they are a Premium car brand. Why not consider them along with Audis, BMWs, Mercedes, etc.
Because let's see, do you buy their generic compact luxury SUV that's not nearly as good as an Audi/BMW/Mercedes, or their generic midsize luxury SUV that's not nearly as good as an Audi/BMW/Mercedes? Or maybe the 8-year-old sedan that's not nearly as good as an Audi/BMW/Mercedes.
The F-Type is Jaguar's only compelling vehicle, imo, just for how good it looks and how it sounds with the V-8, but it's ancient at this point too and going away soon.
As a guy who owned a Jaaaag once (a v12 sedan, briefly, like 25 years ago) and considers himself "temporarily between Jaguars at the moment," and whose parents enjoyed leasing a succession of them in retirement, this comment hits very close to home.
Ten years ago, a Jaguar was a very pretty luxury car that looked great when you walked up to it, and looked great from inside it, all that wood trim and leather surfaces and wool carpet. They didn't handle as well as it looked like they should, and they were never quite as fast or quite as fuel efficient or quite as predictable in corners as their competitors. so they weren't as satisfying to drive. But between "how they drive" and "how they look" they could still be great to OWN. "Isn't this nice in here? I did this FOR YOU. Because I am capable of doing this, and you mean that much to me."
The F-type was better to drive than the XK, and the 2016+ XF was better to drive than the 2015 and earlier SF, but they are still not as good to drive as the competing cars from BMW or Mercedes or Audi - and now they're a little less pretty inside and out than the early ones, and in some cases they're less pretty than the German cars too. The Jag is a hard sell, moreso now than they were 10 years ago even though the cars are generally better now than they were then.
Their SUV is the best looking SUV out right now IMO
I'm a Toyota/Honda guy, so obviously I'm really big on reliability, and am really cognizant of Jag's horrible reputation in that regard. But I still swoon whenever an F-Type drives by. That is one gorgeous vehicle.
Jaguar and Land Rover have had a rough couple decades. While historically English brands, they haven't had British ownership in decades.
JLR were both sold to Ford 20 years ago. And honestly Ford did nothing with them or for them, and the brand suffered immensely for it.
In 2008, Ford sold JLR to Indian company Tata Motors, who are predominantly an economy car manufacturer. They also have struggled to figure out how to design, market, and sell luxury cars.
So I wouldn't buy a Jaguar right now, but honestly it's because of poor leadership and management.
In 2008, Ford sold JLR to Indian company Tata Motors, who are predominantly an economy car manufacturer. They also have struggled to figure out how to design, market, and sell luxury cars.
Are you sure about this? Cause if anything, compared to most of Jaguar and LR history, the TATA ownership era has been the best for the company in terms of actually making great cars.
Sure the Jaguar XF and the Discovery is ugly is a bit weak, but compared to the awfulness of the old X-Type, S-Type, Freelanders and Discovery 2,
The new cars are better in every single way And they do pretty well in Europe. I see a I-Pace, F-Pace and E-Pace everywhere in the UK. And the XE was super competitive with the 3-series. Only issue is thats been on sale for a bit too long and having no true sports model (like an M3/C63) kinda hinders on brand recognition. (Yes there was the Project 8, but that's long gone)
The only impressive thing about Jaguar is that they’re still in business despite how bad their products have been for decades.
The issue with Jaguar is that their dealership and service network doesn't compare to the other big luxury brands.
Most people buying these brands new want the best experience possible. They enjoy the amenities from the dealership. When there's a problem noticed during service(there always is), they'll offer to make the repair and send the customer off in a brand new loaner to enjoy in the meantime.
I second this. Owned a Jaguar XF for about 18 months and sold it due to bad service. Will never purchase one again. Ended up in a BMW 435 and couldn't be happier.
I purchased my car in Miami and live in Jacksonville, FL. The Jacksonville dealership refused to give me loaner vehicles when I'd bring my car in for service under the warranty. They said loaner vehicles are reserved "for customers who purchased their vehicles with us." Uhhh isn't it one big network?? I purchase from a certified JLR dealership. Makes no sense.
I brought it up to the service manager who ended up sending me over to Enterprise and put me in some tiny, cheap piece of shit compact car that I could have flipped over with my pinky.
I again complain to the service manager who had the nerve to say "you're just getting from point a to point b" and had a smug look on his face like he knew what he was doing. I'm sorry, but when I purchase a luxury vehicle, I expect luxury service, which is what I get with BMW. They ended up charging me $45/day and kept my car for 4 days for a low coolant level warning and an oil change. They deliberately screwed me and stuck me with a bill.
The core issue is that these other brands have local competitors of the same brand. Jacksonville has 2 BMW dealerships, 3 Merc dealerships, etc. JLR only has one and the next closest is 2 hours away In Orlando. JLR Jacksonville has no pressure to provide good service because their customers have no other option on where to service their vehicles. The manager literally said to me "if you don't like our service, you can take your car elsewhere".
He knew I was under warranty and had no choice but to use his dealership. Fuck JLR. Never again
Not sure if the dealership service network is the same across the board. I used to have an XF 2010 that lived in the dealership (electrical issues, of course). Service at dealership was excellent and always had a loaner. Not sure if things changed over the last few years. I agree with most of the comments and would add that the reason why some people would buy jags or alfas is because they are tiered of seeing Bmw, Mercedes and Audis all over. So you want something different, something nice that feels luxurious (my jag did back in the day). You know there is reliability issues but it is an emotional decision not a rational one... so you you negotiate a good deal and extend warranties and then you are like ok this will work.... until it doesn't!
The later Ford years were the most reliable Jaguar has ever been.
i feel like the ford years were pretty reliable before the Tata pruchase, they just still kept with dated, gauche styling that had a niche audience and never adapted to the crowd.
Jags had pretty ostentatious exteriors, which some liked, but also gave others the feeling of someone trying to be a "cheap" Aston or something.
They also took WAY too long to updated their drivetrains.
My boyfriend wants to get a new SUV and is considering a couple different options. He wants to buy a couple years older with under 50K miles but is also open to leasing a new one. On principle, he is against buying brand new cars.
The three is he looking at is the Jaguar F-Pace, Audi SQ8, and Mercedes GLS.
Any recommendations or experiences would be greatly appreciated!
Tell him to look at a CPO Genesis GV70 or 80. It may not have the brand cachet of BMW, Mercedes, Audi, or Jaguar, but it easily rivals them on luxury and features.
Thanks for recommendations! We will definitely take a look at the Genesis GV70/80
What does he actually want out of the driving experience?
He just wants enough room to put in a couple sets of golf clubs without putting the seats down and a car that is fun to drive and quick. Not really sure about the overall experience as he is not a "car guy". Definitely values a clean and spacious interior and infotainment system.
Lexus LS
Appreciate the rec! I put 250K on a 2001 Lexus and sold it to a guy who plans to put another 100K miles on it. I think Lexus makes great cars
Tell him he is correct and go back to looking at used vehicles.
The best is always going to be Porsche, that’s a given, the Macan and the Cayenne are stunning, but if you don’t want to spend as much, the next best thing is BMW, they’re really close to Porsche in every aspect that matters for a step down in price. A left field pick would also be the Stelvio 4C, it’s the best handling SUV in its class by far and has a stunning engine, but does compromise the interior somewhat.
The GV70 and 80 are actually quite nice, but they are slower and won’t handle as well, great value for money though, I love their interiors.
I’ve been budgeting for a Jaguar - had my eyes on the I-Pace or F-Pace. Then I read this article running through some really concerning defects and issues, and how the F-Pace was rated least reliable car.
Kind of took the wind out of my sails…
Curious to hear other’s thoughts- thanks!
https://www.hotcars.com/most-glaring-problems-with-jaguars-suvs/
No one gets press by praising a car. Jaguar is just as reliable as every other car/suv in its class (take that for what it’s worth). I’ve driven a Jaguar daily for over 13 years and have several in my garage. They are fine cars of well maintained.
Great to know, thanks. Any Jaguar SUVs?
I bought one of the first F Paces. Ordered it late in 2015 and received it May 2016 (6.5 years ago). I’ve got 94k miles on it and still love it. Amazing drive for an SUV.
Mine has been trouble free - finally had an issue this year that required a reasonably expensive repair. But overall, extremely happy.
I am a very happy E-Pace owner for 6 months, so far so good. The hybrid version is fantastic, I can drive electric to save fuel but change to hybrid mode to accelerate amd feel the engine…
No, I’m not an SUV person.
This comment is rather hilarious and out of touch of reality considering jaguar is always near the bottom of reliability ratings. My friend had nearly 40k CAD of warranty work completed on his car (XF) over 4.5 years of ownership. Sure, it is all warranty work, but his car was gone for weeks at a time and know how much work my Toyota had over the same period of time? Zero.
What are you used to?
If you’re coming from a 2000 Toyota Corolla, there’s a heck of a lot more to go wrong then what you’re used to.
If you’re coming from an equivalent modern Ford or VW, the components of the Jaguar will be of a higher quality and cost more.
So in those cases, or ones like them, it will be a culture shock for you, unless you take the time to prepare yourself. Even if you’re doing an oil change in your driveway, things can be very expensive, let alone taking it to a specialist/dealer (which is what I always recommend).
However, when you compare it to equivalent brands like Porsche, Masersti, and whatever else, it’ll be more reliable and affordable overall. Not that the others are “bad”, but with the exception of Porsche, Jaguar outsells all other comparable brands. This means that it can do a lot more consumer testing then brands like Alfa or Maserati can. Jaguar also does work for other companies, and does the engines for every Land Rover produced, which helps to increase reliability. Porsche can do something similar, in that it’s able to raid the VW parts bin, which helps them keep reliability up. But generally, Porsches cost more then Jags to own.
When you compare to equivalent mainstream executive brands, such as Mercedes, Jaguar tends to fair well. Generally Jags will cost less to maintain then the equivalent German or Japanese car. That’s been the general consensus since the Ford takeover in the 90s. Which again, is not to suggest that German or Japanese executive cars are bad. I ran a similarly specified Mercedes against my Jaguar for awhile, and the Merc cost two or three times more to run. Make no mistake, both cars were awesome, and I loved them both.
If you’re used to large pickup trucks or SUVs, then you’ll find Jaguars in general to be cheaper. Barring the supercar class of vehicle, there’s nothing more expensive to run then the big trucks. Not because the design is flawed, but quite literally, physics and materials.
So in short, manage your expectations. They are luxury performance cars, with lots of technology. They will cost a fair whack of change to own. But as far as the class goes, they are about the same as anything else. At the end of the day, every car has the unique ability to drain your wallet, so you may as well enjoy the car you drive. It’s all about smiles per gallon.
My F-Pace diesel is about to tick over to 100k and it's been basically flawless since 2017
Same! I have a F Pace D since 2017 and only now I have a coolant leak issue. Otherwise no problems at all so far. 🤞🏽🤞🏽
Get it with a warranty from JLR and you’ll be able to extend annually until it’s 10 years old 😊
Thanks good to know. I’ve lived in a city without a car for the past 10 years so I’m pretty new to all this stuff— If I were to go the certified pre owned route is the JLR warranty still an option? And does the warranty come included or is that an extra cost?
Appreciate it!
Yes - the approved used / certified pre-owned comes with 12 month warranty (I’m talking UK here so not sure on USA or whenever you might be).
You can then pay to extend it longer when you purchase I believe, or simply renew on an annual basis. You may have to get the car serviced by Jaguar or perhaps just inspected by them to renew the warranty
My apologies for being away for so long! We were well supported for our last poll, so hopefully we can continue this trend. We love to hear your views and opinions.
As a brief refresher, on our last poll, the XJ220 was our winner by a wide margin. This perhaps isn’t a surprise to many of us, but what was personally impressive to me was the amount of love the XJ50 got — very pleasing to see!
Today, I thought a nice poll would which Jaguar Coupe would you choose? For our hypothetical scenario today, let us pretend we all have a regular DD, and that this is just a weekend or occasional machine. This could be something you’d take to a track once in awhile, or just something you take on a weekend away.
Comment as to your desired interior spec/engine configuration. Would you do some updates to the car, or leave it as OEM spec as you possibly could?
We look forward to your opinion!
I’ve driven most of these. E type for sure. XK comes in at 2nd place for me.
I did choose an F type. The XKR was one of my favorite cars as a kid and the xjs was one of my favorites as a young adult. I am fortunate enough to buy my first Jaguar, an F type S convertible, last year and it has lived up to everything I thought it would be.
Ayyyyyy that’s great to hear!!
Very nice selections! Which era E-Type for you?
67 e type roadster, because it’s mine lol
A very tough choice… an XKR-S GT for track days, but for other stuff, XK120 Supersonic, Pirana concept, E Type Lightweight (I hate the FHC’s roofline), and the Lister XJS 6.0 V12. Love ‘em all.
Exquisite selections!
You’ll like some of the later polls I have in mind I think — stay tuned friend — you’ll have some hard votes to make 😜🤣
Xj6c
It is a wonderful car. I intend to feature it in a future poll, so keep your eyes peeled friend! 😊
XJ-S. Love the look. Love the V12. Love mine.
Exquisite!!! Which version of the V12 are you running? The 6.0 or 5.3?
5.3 HE
best jaguar SUV
Key Considerations for the Best Jaguar SUV
Model Options: Jaguar offers several SUV models, primarily the F-PACE, E-PACE, and I-PACE. Each has its unique features and target audience.
Performance: Look for engine options that suit your driving style. The F-PACE, for example, offers a range of powerful engines, including a supercharged V6 and a turbocharged four-cylinder.
Interior Quality: Jaguar is known for its luxurious interiors. Consider the materials, technology, and comfort features, such as seating and infotainment systems.
Space and Practicality: Evaluate cargo space and passenger comfort. The F-PACE generally offers more space compared to the E-PACE, which is more compact.
Technology and Safety Features: Check for advanced safety features (like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist) and infotainment systems (like the Pivi Pro system) that enhance the driving experience.
Recommendation:
Jaguar F-PACE: This is often regarded as the best overall Jaguar SUV due to its blend of performance, luxury, and practicality. It offers a spacious interior, a range of powerful engines, and a sporty driving experience.
Jaguar I-PACE: If you're considering an electric option, the I-PACE is highly rated for its performance, range (up to 234 miles), and luxurious interior. It's a great choice for those looking to go green without sacrificing luxury.
Jaguar E-PACE: If you prefer a smaller SUV, the E-PACE is a solid choice, offering a sporty design and agile handling, though it has less cargo space compared to the F-PACE.
Ultimately, your choice will depend on your specific needs, such as size, performance, and whether you prefer a traditional or electric vehicle.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.