TL;DR
Blue light blocking lenses are designed to filter out blue light from screens, but there is limited scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness in reducing eye strain or improving sleep [1:5]
[4:3].
Mechanism of Action
Blue light blocking lenses work by using materials that filter out blue light wavelengths while allowing other colors to pass through. This often results in a yellowish tint on the lenses [3:1]. The idea is that by reducing exposure to blue light, which is thought to mimic daylight, these lenses can help reduce eye strain and potentially improve sleep quality.
Scientific Evidence and Skepticism
There is considerable skepticism regarding the efficacy of blue light blocking lenses. Multiple sources, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), have stated that there is no strong scientific support for these lenses improving eye strain, sleep, or eye health [1:5]
[4:1]
[5:4]. Some users report anecdotal benefits such as reduced eye fatigue, but these claims are not backed by robust scientific studies
[1:2]
[4:2].
Effects on Sleep and Eye Health
The belief that blue light affects melatonin production and sleep cycles is widely discussed. However, studies suggest that the amount of blue light emitted by screens is minimal compared to natural sunlight, and may not significantly impact sleep [2:1]
[4:9]. While blue light has been associated with potential retinal damage, this is mostly theoretical and lacks conclusive evidence
[3:6]
[5:2].
Consumer Experience
Despite the lack of scientific backing, some consumers find blue light blocking lenses comfortable and helpful in reducing eye strain during prolonged screen use [3:9]
[5:3]. Others have opted out of purchasing them due to insufficient evidence of their benefits
[5:5]. Ultimately, the decision to use blue light blocking lenses may come down to personal preference and perceived comfort rather than proven efficacy.
In summary, while blue light blocking lenses are marketed as beneficial for reducing eye strain and improving sleep, the scientific community remains skeptical about their effectiveness. Consumers should weigh the anecdotal benefits against the lack of solid evidence when considering these lenses.
Part of the marketing seems to be that blue light inhibits melatonin production, therefore having a blue light filter on your glasses will help improve sleep. I can understand the logic if you only wear them a few hours before bed, but if you wear them all the time wouldn't your brain adapt and end up the same in the longer term just with a lower baseline of blue light? Or what about somebody like me who wears glasses outside but looks at the phone without glasses in bad before going to sleep, wouldn't wearing them all day except in bed just trick my brain into thinking it was early morning and make my melatonin plummet? Am I missing something here?
I have seen no persuasive evidence that wearing blue light protection on glasses does anything at all except cost more. I will sell blue light filters to people who insist they want them, but I never push them. My usual verbiage is something like, "some people find that they help reduce eye fatigue, but if you aren't on screens for hours at a time and noticing significant eye fatigue, this is probably something you can leave out."
Personally, I think they're snake oil.
It's anecdotal.
So yes, there is evidence about blue light and the effect on sleep cycles. Which is why if you shove people in a dark space with no blue light, their sleep cycles will completely change and what would be considered a "day" is different.
Blue light coating on glasses can help with relaxing eyes when you spend a lot of time on computers. That is due to screens causing us to blink less, which may be due to blue light and overstimulating in our brains. So the coatings helping relax the eyes means less tired eyes and less dry eyes technically. You could get the same effect as a blue light coating by turning on the blue light filters on your phone or turning the yellow up on your screen settings. The outdoors gives you the most blue light and the coating only filters a certain amount at a certain wave length, so it's not really gonna be doing a heap when you are out and about during the day. Some people don't actually find the coatings particularly helpful tbh, especially the more screen focused violet ones.
TLDR: Everyone's brain is different and we haven't had devices super accessible for long enough to have the proper long term effect studies into the coatings to know if blue light coatings really work for everyone. Change your computer settings.
I don't think there are any studies that show significant differences between wearing blue light filters and not. I personally hated it with my new lenses. When I took off my glasses it made colors a lot more intense/vivid and made me feel like I had hppd. I ended up returning my new glasses and am just wearing my old glasses for the time being. I refuse to have blue light going forward
As others have said, no evidence supporting them, but wanted to add that the AAO doesn’t recommend them. https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/are-computer-glasses-worth-it
No scientific study has established that blue light filtering lenses do what manufacturers claim.
On the other hand, I have seen marketing info produced by lens companies for retailers that herald blue light coatings as a means to increase transaction prices for people who need prescription lenses and create new sales to people who do not require corrective lenses.
At best, they provide a placebo effect. More likely, it’s just marketing BS.
We humans are mainly controlled by our hormones, everything to do with health from physical, mental, and emotional. Our hormones are very much dependent on our circadian rhythm; and our circadian rhythm is very much dependent on sunlight. Blue light from both devices and (mainly) sunlight blocks the production of melatonin (sleep hormone) in the body. If we get our sleep right, all other things fall into place. This is why it’s encouraged to not look at screens during the night, so that we can build up in melatonin and go to sleep; which also makes sense that the sun is not up at night because the blue light from the sunlight affect this too. Sunlight in the day signals to our body that it’s daytime and help us stay awake. Since blue light play such a crucial role in our sleep wake cycle, why are we not talking about blocking blue light during the day and how that affects us?
Glasses companies are marketing blue light blocking glasses as good but no one talks about the negative effects of blocking the natural blue light during the day. A normal piece of glass (like a window) would block out 50% of blue light from the sun, so we could assume that blue light blocking glasses are stripping off most of the blue light we need in the day.
Edit: I would greatly appreciate if someone can correct me instead of just downvoting me and not say anything, for those downvoting the post
Yeah blue blocking lenses are a scam, because of exactly your argument. If you go outside on an overcast day and open your eyes for five minutes that is significantly more blue light exposure then a screen throughout the day. Blue light during the day is important for our sleep wake cycle and excessive UV can cause retinal damage, but normal blue light from the sun or screen isn’t harmful.
What about for people with dry eye AND PDS, like me? Can't this be sort of a reliever?
You got to ask an eye specialist
Mhm.
But they most block out more light, in general, than purely clear lenses, right?
>This is why it’s encouraged to not look at screens during the night, so that we can build up in melatonin and go to sleep
It's never actually been proven that blue light from screens at night prevent sleep. Compared to sunlight, the blue light from devices is like an ant compared to an elephant. It likely isn't intense enough to do any significant damage. That's not to say devices don't keep you awake at night, but it's not because of the blue light. It's because... Well it's something to stay up late doing.
It's also not the only factor in controlling circadian rhythm. Studies in animals show that the rhythm persists even in absolute darkness. And bed time rituals, sleeping habits, etc all play a part. This is the more likely reason devices keep us up late. Texting friends and scrolling through Facebook and reddit isn't a good way to settle yourself down for sleep. It's likely cues from sunlight merely nudge us in the right direction and help keep the rhythm steady, but don't totally govern our sleeping.
>Glasses companies are marketing blue light blocking glasses as good but no one talks about the negative effects of blocking the natural blue light during the day.
It has come up among the scientific community, but no you won't find a marketer bringing it up. There is no money in that. At any rate nothing has been proven on the subject yet so you won't find scientist advocating for or against it. I suggest you don't look to marketing agencies and big for-profit companies for accurate, unbiased, and nuanced scientific data anyway.
>A normal piece of glass (like a window) would block out 50% of blue light from the sun, so we could assume that blue light blocking glasses are stripping off most of the blue light we need in the day.
I'm pretty sure you're confusing blue light and ultraviolet light. They are not the same. If glasses blocked 50% of BLUE light then everything would look yellow tinted behind glass, but they could block out 100% of ultraviolet light and you wouldn't notice a difference because our photoreceptors are insensitive to ultraviolet light (basically uv is invisible to humans). Also glasses are made from plastic, not glass, so that statement is sort of irrelevant anyway. Also if blue light blocking glasses stripped "most" of the blue light out of the spectrum then everything would look EXTREMELY yellow, and the glasses themselves would look like an amber colored lens. In reality, "blue light blocking" glasses that you see advertised block less than 10% - 20% of blue light. Any more than that and everything will take on an obnoxious amber color and they'd never sell. This means that even if you wanted to assume blue light from devices is harmful (which it probably isn't), the stuff they sell you as "blue light blocking" hardly blocks any blue light anyway. You'd get better and cheaper blue light absorption from tinting your lens yellow. Basically it's a scam no matter what you believe about blue light. This is also why we're not too concerned blue blockers being dangerous to the general public.
The computer screen tinting is a lot stronger than most of the blue-light blockers built into corrective lenses. I suspect to make a significant impact you'd have to distort the color spectrum significantly more than people are willing to wear all the time.
Get the best defensive blue lens glasses to prevent your eyes from damages of screen light emitting from smartphones, computers and other digital devices.
Blue light occupies a certain frequency range (in simple terms, it has a specific shape to it) that causes your body to produce less of the stuff it needs to make you sleepy. We're actually exposed to it and all visible light (and even invisible light) when we're outside in the sunlight. Naturally we tend to have this exposure during the day, when the sun is shining, and then we stop getting it after the sun sets, and that's part of the reason why you start to get more tired at night.
However, all the screens we look at all day, from computer monitors to cellphones, also produce light, including blue light.
Blue light filters are designed to block out light of a specific frequency (the blue frequencies) so they don't reach your eyes and then suppress the production of that hormone that makes you sleepy.
The point is that people in the 21st century spend a lot of time looking at screens and therefore ruining the quality and amount of sleep they get which can cause health problems long-term (and just make you feel nasty in the morning lol).
This is not true and recent studies have shown that bright light not blue light MAY be an issue. Equally bright yellow light was more disruptive than blue light for example.
Also the glasses must not be filtering much blue light out at all, right? Because colors still look normal!
In the same way that magnetic bracelets and crystals may cure cancer, blue light might be harmful.
This is factually incorrect.
Natural light is bluer at night than during the day. That's why movie emulate night time by color grading towards a blueish hue "night time" scenes filmed during the day.
The only positive effect of filtering blue light is that it degrade the color rendering quality of your screen, and having lower color perception is expected at night by your brain.
Most scientific studies agree that blue light filtering actually doesn't help at all, but turning your device to gray scale helps.
All this talk about blue light filtering is just stuff that sells. It's the same with diamond being eternal (they burn exactly like coal), it's just marketing all the way to the core. There is not a single factual bit of truth.
There has been research that excessive blue light might damage the cornea or retina of the eyes and excessive blue light could affect melatonin production which might affect sleep.
While these are grounded in good theoretical biology and physiology principles, in practice, blue light filtering glasses sold commercially don't seem to have measurable affect on sleep quality in studies and long term eye damage is very difficult to measure.
So, the jury is still out, but where real world and theoretical clash, I tend to believe the real world studies. Even if blue light is a problem, current blue light filtering glasses have not proven to be a solution, so there's not much more we can do until we find a proven solution.
All I know is it's a lot easier to use computers with my yellow lenses than sunglasses. Boss doesn't appreciate sunglasses, it's a bit too dark anyway, and it keeps me from getting twitchy eyes by lunch. It definitely seems like its efficacy is in question, but if you can get them cheap or clip-on to your existing glasses, they're pretty helpful.
Possibility #1 is that it's placebo since eye fatigue doesn't have any type of empirical measurement, or possibility #2 is it's just reducing the amount of light in general and wearing $1 sunglasses would probably work better. Even cheaper, just turn down the screen brightness to match your environment better and you don't have to deal with a yellow tint to the image.
My bets on #1 though as most recent studies have shown that it's around 50/50 whether or not someone reports them "working," which tends to point towards placebo.
The Belief: Blue light reminds our brains of daylight, and therefore causes our brains/bodies to produce chemicals that keep us awake
How glasses work: Just like any type of light filtering, the glasses are just made of materials that block blue light from passing through them, but still allow other colors to pass through. This is usually done by tinting them yellow-ish.
In reality: Probably snake oil. As more information comes out, it's likely that the original studies weren't representative of the actual data and blue light probably doesn't affect anything outside of the margin of error.
So you’re telling me the YouTube ads about blue light glasses, u-shaped toothbrushes and square pillows are scams??
Apparently:
The UK College of Optometrists and Cochrane both caution there is no strong scientific support for blue-light glasses improving eye strain, sleep, or eye health in the general population.
The AAO likewise finds no evidence that blue light from devices harms the eyes—and thus does not suggest investing in blue-blocking glasses for eye protection.
Please let me know before I invest in a pair.
I had issues with dry eyes and low mucus/moisture production as a result of having eaten plant based for many years. I'm a low converter of betacarotene, and therefore ended up with vitamin a deficiency.
Orange, blue light blocking glasses decreased my symptoms of discomfort quite significantly when I wore them while sitting on the computer, so I've been using them regularly for about 3 years now. It's only an anecdote, but despite the "studies" claiming BS, it has definitely had an effect for me. And I didn't expect much from them, to begin with.
The text on the screen of my computer gets blurry without blue light glasses!
Interesting, I’ll have to try these. Had a dna test recently that confirmed I don’t absorb beta carotene well so need to supplement vit A and take extra care of my eyes!
Now do the same with polarized/antiglare glasses.
I'm willing to bet that it is not the blue light filtering part that is helping, but the other properties of the glasses.
As you said, there is no medical evidence. I work in neurotech/sleeptech, so I'll point only to the evidence I am familiar with, which is all related to sleep.
Check out Michael Gradisar's Blog post
https://winksleep.online/blog/65-blue-screenlight-making-it-harder-to-fall-asleep-is-the-number-1-sleep-myth-of-our-time
In it, he goes into how research studies have been designed to show the effect of blue-light, specifically wrt sleep. These are not normal every day scenarios.
This doesn't mean the results are doctored. The studies were designed to look at how melatonin and sleep relate to blue light.
There are many studies that show decreased melatonin levels from blue-light.
What they don't show is that the reduced melatonin results in any statistically significant delay in sleep onset, or other issues related to sleep.
So that's strike one. Does blue-light even impact sleep? No.
Strike two is that most people look to these melatonin studies to show that blue light affects melatonin. But even if blue-light did affect melatonin levels enough to be concerned about, that doesn't mean that blue-light blocking glasses are the solution.
That's a whole other level of research that would be needed. And as you've said, everything comes up saying these do not provide a significant benefit.
To add to this from a practical stand point from a light nerd. All of the fear mongering podcasts I've seen are grifting specialty products and quoting blue light backlights as the cause of problems. Almost all consumer products are now using OLED technology that is not blue light backlit. Each pixel is self illuminated which means the blue light dominance doesn't actually exist for modern phones. I will concede that if you have a 10 year old tv, then that changes a bit.
If they're selling something I'm immediately skeptical. On one of the podcasts I listened to they expressed that LEDs flicker which is really bad but that standard lights bulbs don't which is patently false. Standard lightbulbs flicker as much as LEDs do. If these "blue light is bad" experts are incorrect on basics of the technology and slinging products id tread with caution buying their BS.
Wow, this is blowing my mind, and confusing me, frustrating me, urgh ! I thought I was on to a sure thing with these glasses to improve my sleep, but no, yet an other biohacking myth
What do you mean that reduced melatonin doesn't impact sleep? Is that new research? Because my understanding of melatonin was that it is an integral part of the circadian rhythm and its role in the onset of sleep was well established. Am I missing something?
Also I don't know why the studies Gradisar noted weren't included, but if they weren't published in peer reviewed journals that is often why they aren't included in meta-analyses (though admittedly peer reviewed can bias certain things). But I would also take his conclusions with a grain of salt as he includes his own "insomnia treatment" package at the bottom.
I do agree that brightness plays into it (as Gradisar mentions) but I never used blue light glasses for iPads, I had my kids use them for the big screen tv which is super bright and I can't dim it or yellow the screen.
In addition, I think studies are helpful starting points for what to try but there is only one subject who matters in this and it's the OP. If it works for them then great and you can do your own experimentation. Blue light blocking glasses probably aren't the panacea unless you're bathed in blue/bright/white light in the evening before you plan to sleep and cant get out of that activity.
And in general working with a reputable sleep specialist can be helpful in case other factors are at play and you have bad insomnia
I read it as blue light disrupts melatonin but not at a high enough level to impact sleep.
Wow! I never even noticed (or maybe it's new) that the Wink website is selling CBTi. Gradisar is head of sleep science at SleepScore (recently re-branded Sleep.ai I think).
I think the same research is posted on sleepscore's website, I'll use that in the future.
You are correct melatonin is an integral part of the circadian rhythm.
It's the dose that makes the poison.
The change in melatonin levels as a result of blue-light, even at very high lux, is not enough of a change to significantly alter sleep onset.
That's the point I was trying to make.
I cant speak on glasses, but as an avid screen filter enjoyer, even if its psychological, I find it much easier to look at blue light reduced screens.
Yellow/orange, I don't think the clear ones can block 99% like the yellow/orange glasses do.
I have blue light filtering in my prescription glasses. Honestly, I don't notice any difference whatsoever. I could be wrong though.
When you look at the light spectrum, blue light is right next to UV which we already know is harmful. So the concern is that the extra exposure to blue light from screens and other devices could cause some extra damage to the eyes. Now there hasn’t been enough data or studies yet to show if this is actually the case.
In my office we usually explain the blue light filtering as a comfort option while explaining that the long term effects still aren’t known. We’ve had patients that always get it on their glasses because they say it’s the only thing that keeps them from getting headaches when working on the computer for extended periods of time, and we’ve had people that don’t notice any difference. For me personally I notice my eyes aren’t as tired or worn out by the end of the day with the blue light filter in my glasses.
Side note too, there are different ways to get a blue light filter in the lenses so it could be worth it to talk to your optician or doctor about the different options.
Now there hasn’t been enough data or studies yet to show if this is actually the case.
Except there are studies that show being outside results in many magnitudes more blue light exposure than viewing of electronic devices and indoor lighting. The sun exposes us to far, far more blue light than will ever be received from electronic device usage or LED lighting.
Side note too, there are different ways to get a blue light filter in the lenses so it could be worth it to talk to your optician or doctor about the different options.
How is it possible to have a genuine discussion about the multitude of different options, where there isn't a consensus on what the lenses should even do? This coating blocks x% at x nanometers. This tints blocks a different percent of a different wavelength, this lens has a coating and a slight tint(and still only blocks 20% of a small band), this lens is virtually clear (but it still somehow useful? Right.), etc. What is the point of a discussion with so many unknown parameters and different "solutions"? The ECPs don't know which ones are "better" than the others, or if any are useful at all.
Purely anecdotal, but in my experience blue light filters are more comfortable for my eyes. I use them all the time on my electronics, so I thought having them on my glasses would help. The way I like to think of it is that the effect of the blue light filter on the lenses stack on top of the filters on the devices.
Although there is little scientific evidence proving that blue light filters are effective, I like to use daylight bulbs vs. soft white bulbs as unscientific proof that they work for some people.
In a bedroom you’d use soft white bulbs (2700K) to create an inviting and relaxing atmosphere, which is ideal before bedtime. On an iPhone the blue light filter is labeled as “Night Shift” which is designed to help you get a better night’s sleep. I believe this is indeed effective because I find that with a daylight bulb (5000K) in a bedroom, it tends to keep me awake whereas with a soft white bulb it helps create that relaxing ambiance to help me relax and fall asleep better. The equivalent to a daylight bulb is disabling the night shift setting on my iPhone while the soft white bulb is equivalent to a blue light filter (or night shift enabled) since it also gives off a warm yellow vibe. I find that using my iPhone at night with night shift disabled causes discomfort and strain on my eyes, but with it enabled I’m able to use my iPhone for longer periods of time without discomfort or strain and I’m able to fall asleep better.
So you could view blue light filtering as either a preference or a gimmick. If you don’t like the yellow tint or if the normal color tone for screens doesn’t cause you discomfort, feel free to opt for normal lenses. Otherwise, lenses with blue light filtering are great for people who find it more comfortable for their eyes.
Here is an intresting article from AAOA. This is not from some blogger, or someone sponsored by a optical company etc.
Personally I opted out of it for my most recent pairs, the new data basically states that there’s insufficient evidence that it provides actual benefits.
Short answer: no.
If so, what are the benefits?
I have a blue light filter on my prescription glasses and I love it, it also blocks a great deal of UV. If you're a video/photo editor or otherwise need high color accuracy I don't recommend it. The filter augments color perception and it may mess with your work, for me it makes reds and greens pop more, games and content look more vibrant. What's most important though is that eye fatigue is almost a non issue for me anymore. I have severe astigmatism in one eye and far sighted in the other, with my old lenses I felt I HAD to take breaks with these I take breaks for maintenance.
they do what they are advertised to do, does it help health the way they say? still debated
Personally I highly doubt they do, because there’s no chance a computer screen emits enough blue light to require filtration
My local opticians had a blue light thing that they could put onto plain lenses, you just pick out the frames.
As for work, I get considerably less headaches and my eyes usually feel less tired after spending the majority of the day doing work on my PC. I feel like it's subject to person and product
Hey everyone, I’ve been seeing a lot of hype around blue light blocking glasses lately, especially the red or orange-lens ones used at night to support sleep and circadian rhythm.
I’m curious — do any of you actually notice measurable benefits from using them? Better sleep quality, energy levels, less eye strain, etc.? Or is it more placebo than performance?
Also, are there specific brands or lens types that truly make a difference, or is it all just marketing?
Appreciate any insights from those who’ve tried them seriously!
I had no idea that there were glasses for sleeping...
They block the blue light thats coming from screens so they help
Oh aren't their filters on the devices that make them show up more orange without needing any special glasses?
I use them pretty much all the time when using devices (except right now actually lol). But yes I find they reduce headaches and eye strain a lot. I imagine it’s better for my eyes in the long-run too.
There are some studies that they might help reduce frequency and duration of migraines in chronic migriane patients who have light sensitivity and photophobic triggers. Other than that? Probably not much. You shouldn't be using screens at night if you can avoid it.
Yeah they don't do anything for most people
I used to have some for migraines.
If you use computers and screens a lot, yes. If you don't, they won't make much difference.
Better sleep for me
Hi ladies, so I work an office job and stare at a screen all day and tend to be on my laptop quite a bit after work as well.
I’m strongly considering buying blue light blocking glasses but have heard conflicting reviews. Do they really work, has anyone noticed a considerable difference since using them? All responses appreciated!
I've had them since 2020 and can't say they make a difference tbh. For me, I had better luck with an app called Lux that dims the display gradually when I was working into the evening.
or just use night settings all the time? why we need apps for everything smh
i have an app that tells me when i have to do laundry! its great
Or maybe they like the benefits of the blue light during the day and the benefits of the lack of blue light closer to night? Idk just using my brain I guess
seconding the Lux app app, op. the first couple of weeks i started using Lux, i started going to bed a couple hours earlier. i made the most of that habit.
Not sure about lux but I’ve had good experience with flux.
The way they work is by filtering out blue light, which typically causes your brain to respond in a certain way which interrupts normal patterns of sleep, and also can cause visual strain but I don’t know much about visual strain. I find they help me, as does having night mode on my iPad all the time.
I have chronic migraines so it may be different for you, but I’ve noticed a huge difference in how tired my eyes are at the end of the day. I also notice when I’m using my phone or iPad for long periods of time and aren’t using them that my eyes get tired a lot faster.
Which ones do you have?
Similar situation, my eyes are really sensitive but luckily I don't get migraines. In the evening it makes a huge difference, or any time that my eyes just feel tired.
I have friends for whom it does nothing. I guess it depends on how your eyes react to light.
I'd say it's a good upgrade for anyone whose eyes sometimes feel tired.
Your post was auto-removed after a large number of reports were received, please review Reddiquette and our sub rules
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I haven't noticed a difference, I've had the blue light lenses for almost a year now. No major differences in sleep patterns though I've always been a good sleeper regardless of screen activity (I also work on a PC).
I work in clinical research and have spoken to several light researchers about this. Their general suggestion is that while they don’t make a huge amount of difference overall, as far as fatigue, they do make a difference as far as regulating your nocturnal and diurnal cycles. His suggestion was to allow blue light penetration in the first half of the day and wear blue light protection glasses in the later half of the day so that it doesn’t disrupt your circadian rhythm for evening and night time.
This is really good info as someone who has serious sleep issues (narcolepsy causing both hypersomnia and insomnia, nightmares, messed up sleep schedule, etc). Once our daughter was born I set the house up with Hue lights that automatically go blue during the day and yellow at night. I swore I wouldn't break my daughter's circadian rhythm so young with artificial lights like ours were.
Highly recommend Zenni Optical. Affordable, lots of options and various styles, can get prescription or non prescription blue light blockers.
I concur with this, I’ve never spent more than $95 on a pair of glasses from them, and I have to get the high-index lenses. I always get the blue-light blocking coating on them too. I am so blind that I can’t not wear glasses if I want to see, so the idea of glasses to me as an accessory is a bit strange.
When I wear my contacts, I like to have a pair of non-prescription blue light blocking glasses just because I spend an average of 10-12 hours on screens. My eyes don’t super love contacts though so I don’t use them much. Plus side is that they were so cheap on Zenni I don’t feel bad I only use them every now and then.
My prescription is very high and I paid $70 for frames with blue light blockers, my recent pair I got transitions and still under $100.
Yeah I’ve gotten the Mac daddy all add on prescription lenses through them and it was still significantly cheaper than buying a pair through my optometrist even with good insurance. Also, my HSA card allows purchases through Zenni so I just end up using my insurance on contacts through my optometrist and getting glasses and even prescription and non prescription sunglasses through Zenni.
Same. I spend pretty much all day everyday from when I wake up to when I go to bed looking at screens, except for when I'm reading or crocheting in my down time! My zenni glasses saved my head because they're so cheap and I can afford the blue light blocking! It's absolutely the best thing!
This study is on artificial light of any kind, not blue light. We're discussing whether "blue light limiting" glasses improve the "effects" of blue light, not if artificial light is harmful or not.
No. I just toggle my devices so that they don’t use as much blue light after sundown.
I keep my phone and computer permanently on night mode that removes most of the blue light. Normal screens are jarring now
I have blue light lenses on my prescription glasses from Warby Parker
Or are they just another way for companies to make money?
I like using them for driving at night to cut down on glare from other drivers lights, also a bit easier for looking at a computer screen for long periods of time.
So they do work for you on a computer?
Yeah for a while when I was on the computer most of the day my eyes would feel strained and wearing mine made it feel much easier.
Mine have uv400 and anti glare and blue blocker. Also clear so it doesn't distort color much at all
Yeah, but so does f.lux which is just a program on your computer and is free.
My friend was obsessed with them a few years ago and I always thought there was no way they were that great. I finally got some and noticed I didn't get headaches or nausea anymore from being on my computer for 8hours at work. When I put them on I immediately feel the difference as well. My eyes feel more relaxed. I don't think it's a placebo since I had a negative mindset about them when I first tried them on but yet it still gave me positive results. It got to a point where I thought I had to quit my job because my headaches and nausea would get so bad.
Lots of people feel better when they use them. It is unclear how that works, it might be placebo, but there's nothing wrong with a good placebo as long as its not harmful
They work in the sense that they filter blue light.
I'm guessing what you mean is if there are actual benefits to doing so. In such case, it depends what benefits you're talking about. Seeing less blue light is probably not going to be life-changing for you.
Video games. Long term exposure to digital screens for work. Etc.
>Video games.
What about them? What supposed benefits are you hoping to gain in terms of video games?
>Long term exposure to digital screens for work
What about it? What supposed benefits are you hoping to gain in terms of looking at screens at work?
how do blue light blocking lenses work
Key Considerations on Blue Light Blocking Lenses:
Understanding Blue Light: Blue light is a high-energy visible light emitted by screens (phones, computers, TVs) and artificial lighting. It can contribute to digital eye strain and disrupt sleep patterns.
Lens Coating: Blue light blocking lenses are coated with a special filter that absorbs or reflects blue light wavelengths, reducing the amount that reaches your eyes.
Potential Benefits:
Types of Lenses:
Considerations for Use: While blue light blocking lenses can be beneficial, they are not a cure-all. It's also important to practice the 20-20-20 rule (every 20 minutes, look at something 20 feet away for 20 seconds) and maintain proper screen distance and lighting.
Recommendation: If you spend significant time in front of screens, consider investing in a pair of blue light blocking glasses, especially if you experience eye strain or have trouble sleeping. Look for lenses that have been tested for effectiveness and ensure they fit comfortably.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.