TL;DR Lululemon has not been explicitly mentioned in discussions about fair trade practices, and there is limited information available regarding their specific stance on fair labor supply chains. However, the brand's broader ethical and environmental practices have been debated.
Ethical Consumerism and Supply Chains
The importance of ethical consumerism and transparency in supply chains was highlighted in discussions, with a focus on companies needing to provide verified accountability from raw materials to delivery [2:1]. While Lululemon wasn't specifically mentioned, this context underscores the growing consumer demand for brands to ensure fair labor practices throughout their supply chains.
Fast Fashion vs. Luxury Brand Debate
There is a debate about whether Lululemon fits into the fast fashion category due to its frequent product releases and trend-following characteristics [5:2]
[5:9]. Fast fashion typically involves lax ethical standards, which could imply a lack of fair trade practices. However, some argue that Lululemon maintains high quality and does not fit the traditional fast fashion mold
[5:4].
Quality and Ethical Standards
Concerns about declining quality and ethical/environmental standards at Lululemon were raised, suggesting potential issues with fair trade practices [5:9]. Some users noted that the brand used to have higher production quality when items were made locally
[5:6], indicating a shift in manufacturing practices over time.
Recommendations Beyond Discussions
To gain clarity on Lululemon's stance on fair trade, consumers can reach out directly to the company or look for third-party audits and certifications related to ethical sourcing. Additionally, exploring resources like B-Labs reports or sustainability rankings might provide insights into Lululemon's labor practices.
Many consumers don't realize that most modern supply chains — from our phones to our clothes to our food — rely heavily on exploited labor, often in conditions that violate basic human rights.
How can we address this global labor injustice? I'm curious to hear your thoughts.
The EU's CSDDD is a solid start. The center right seems to be wanting to destroy this regulation right when it's finally starting to be effective... https://procurementmag.com/supply-chain-management/deregulation-how-will-the-eu-omnibus-impact-sustainability
Yeah, it's a shame that the omnibus directive has been watered down by the right. It would have been a good step in the right direction.
Probably have to develop a country-specific labor solidarity strategy—challenges facing workers in Bangladesh and how to address them will almost certainly be radically different than the specifics for Chinese labor organizers.
It requires both strong regulation among different blocks and cooperation with vulnerable countries to implement long term solutions, for example: Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
There are many fronts here: institutional weaknesses, war, corruption, lack of stability, poverty, child labor,etc. We need cooperation that listens to the needs of each community, that makes the local economy grow, that allows kids to stay in school rather than mining, in cocoa farms or being recruited by militias.
It will take years but with enough pressure it can work.
Need to get rid of the dictators or warlords in third world countries
As a consumer, I guess one could try to find ethically sourced products, but it's oftentimes difficult to find the line of supply.
Politically, supporting democratic governments in countries where exploitation is happening could help. For example, nationalizing the oil industry in Iran (had the CIA not helped a dictatorship rise to power) could have made Iran a much, much richer country today. If countries can nationalize/stabilize their industries, moving away from banana republicanism, towards using their resources to stabilize their economies, it would be a win-win. The country in question is now richer, and exploitation has been minimized (if not illegalized).
I've been thinking a lot about ethical consumerism lately, especially regarding companies like ArtisanOdyssey that focus on handcrafted goods. It's great that they're supporting artisans and preserving conventional crafts, but how deeply are they really investigating labor rights throughout their supply chains?
We often see marketing highlighting the beautiful, unique items and the stories behind them, perhaps showing smiling artisans at work.but what about the hours, the wages, and the working conditions beyond those carefully curated images? Are thes artisans receiving fair compensation and working in safe environments? Is there genuine openness about the entire process, from sourcing materials to the final sale?
It feels like there's a responsibility on us as consumers to demand more than just a feel-good story. Do we need autonomous audits of these supply chains? Are there better certifications to look for that genuinely guarantee fair labor practices? Or are we simply relying on a romanticized idea of ethical production that might not always hold up under scrutiny? I'd be interested in hearing others' perspectives on this and any resources you might know of for assessing ArtisanOdyssey's labor rights record, or similar companies, more effectively.
Great point ethical sourcing isn’t just about origin stories, it’s about the entire supply chain. Transparent logistics, third-party audits, and traceable sourcing systems are key. Without verified accountability from raw materials to delivery, even the most beautiful product can hide unethical practices.
Is Lululemon financially struggling? Lots of changes with WMTM and new release days. Lots of news articles stating alot of these markdowns show a company could be struggling.
Those aren’t signs; rising debt levels & spending more on debt servicing, QoQ in retail sales declines, internet traffic, manufacturing issues, management changes, lowering of financial outlook guidelines, etc
Basically diving into their 10-K, 10Q & investor updates will give a better outlook, changing markdown days is just marketing fluff.
I have no idea where the myth Lululemon is struggling comes from: their quarterly results are still very strong, with growth in revenues and gross profit… their key strategy is grow in China, which they are achieving quite well Source: their Q1 2025 quarterly financial report
I love lulu but it’s expensive plus in this economy I can see them not making a huge profit. They should lower prices.
If anything lowering prices will reduce profits.
People are still buying so business common sense would be to raise prices especially since margins are under pressure due to cost pressures.
Lululemon knows it’s a premium brand, lowering its prices is one of the worst things it can do. Ubiquity is usually spells the death of any premium brand. Selling less at higher prices is a much better plan. Premium customers who can afford the higher prices are also much less likely to materially alter their spending patterns due to economic headwinds
With the exception of Arizona Ice Tea & Ben & Jerry’s & Patagonia, there is no incentive for Lululemon to lower their prices especially when some items sell out and people are willing to pay more than retail prices for items.
I know they aren’t going too lower prices. I’m just saying if they want more people to buy stuff then they should. There are better athletic brands like Athletica and Alo that have the same price point. If I could get more for my buck I would shop more at Lulu.
I dont really think lulu is that expensive, 10 years ago I paid 128 for tights that are still roughly the same price now (maybe 138, a measly $10 difference. I wear and wash those lulu tights near weekly and it is still going strong. My cost per wear with lululemon quality is near pennies. Luxtreme, everlux, swiftly, defines, skirts, grooves have all stood the test of time
I can't say the same with Athleta or Alo, after just a few months it's pulled or pilljng and I dont even want to reach for them The prices are near same as lululemon
Quality pieces at $100 is honestly fine compared to like $30 cheap fast fashion level items
I've never had anything from Athleta showing wear in such timeframe so I disagree. Athleta fleece, for example, is better quality thaan Lulu's and at a better price. And currently Athleta has better colours and some better designs.
The quality of lululemon has gone down. It’s not what it was before. My Athletica leggings have lasted longer than the new lululemon I bought last year. I
The quality of lululemon has gone down. It’s not what it was before. My Athletica leggings have lasted longer than the new lululemon I bought last year.
I have no qualifications to justify this but in my mind we'd be seeing better/greater markdowns if the company was actually struggling. They have such a huge profit margin that they could easily sell leggings for $29 and still be making a profit so my guess is they're testing out increasing prices and putting items "on sale" for what they were before the price increase to see if buyers bite.
I honestly just think things are going on sale because it’s that time of year where clothing companies start making the transition to fall
Considering splurging on a new mat and curious which companies have fair labor supply chain auditing. I would have thought this would be easy info to uncover, but mostly finding marketing-speak. I'm not suggesting any of these companies are actively harming workers, but the silence is concerning... particularly given how often consumer mat conversations are about the toxic odors found even in the finished products.
Liforme, Manduka and Gaim talk about how they are ethical companies committed to transparency, but I've only been able to find language around environmental sustainability and (tax-deductible) donations to social justice causes. Liforme's B-Corp report is super-vague. Hoping I missed something.
Alo says it's "sweatshop-free," but verify only final production, they separately rate low in other ethical metrics. Prana describes its clothing certs, but not mats (and is a subsidiary of Columbia which has a terrible labor record).
Jade points out that being based in the U.S. means they are subject to U.S. labor law, which isn't exactly a living wage guarantee, but seems better than many others. Hugger Mugger distinguishes between its U.S. and sustainable products and doesn't discuss worker conditions for either.
Anyone aware of companies (maybe small businesses), that produce their own high quality mats and have formally committed to stand by the people doing the actual work? I find it hard to believe that increased public scrutiny/pressure might actually make Nike the leader here and hoping I've overlooked statements from any of these companies or other obvious choices.
I've used the same two mats since 2003, so don't mind spending a bit more for something that both performs well and reflects my values, but don't know where else to look.
I'm literally on the same quest. Please keep me posted if you find anything! I've sent a few emails. No replies yet.
Not much yet! And no other responses. I haven't found the B-Labs report for B, Halfmoon. Jurisdictions vary on whether they have to make them public. Their B-Labs score is slightly lower than Liforme (really just over the cert threshold); worker score is higher for "Health, Wellness & Safety" but slightly lower overall and neither are great.
I did find the factory in China that makes Manduka's yoga blocks (along with, as far as I can tell, a substantial portion of the world's yoga mats overall- I suspect some of theirs). It wouldn't be acceptable by U.S. standards (and it's very clear "eco-friendly" is just another product line for them, no change in operations, just input materials), but by China labor standards it's not bad. E.g. zero worker protective gear and plastic/rubber dust & residue flying around, but at least the machines melting down the plastic and rubber have vent hoods, and the big machines have basic "don't cut off your finger" safeties. It seems like most mats globally are made in conditions like this, and most have baseline labor standard certifications like BSCI (basically distinguishing between literal sweatshops/forced/child labor and regular factory conditions, however imperfect).
There is a German company called "Fairmove" that sells a 3mm thick, 5 lb rubber mat that is fair trade certified. Not excited about it just, like, as a product, so didn't look into where it's available.
I'm curious to make inquiry of Yoloha (cork mats, some kind of bio-plastic base). They say the cork industry (as a whole) pays fair wages and have a whole song and dance about the base material product development, a little vague about actual sourcing and manufacture (other than "unity"), but make a very compelling pitch for being people who generally try to do the right thing. Always hard to tell how much is marketing.
try emailing these companies to find out more? i think liforme and manduka are pretty responsive, gaiam i have no experience with
None have responded on social, but I'll try that! I did ask several more companies. Most have not responded. Shakti Warrior got back to me immediately confirming their commitment in this area and saying that they have compliance documents on file, which is the international equivalent of Jade's "we abide by local laws" position.
Honestly, I don't care if liforme kills dogs to make yoga mats. I'll stick with them as long as I can get on a mat.
It looks as though it may be one of the more commonly asked questions around the sub, which are well covered by searching the subreddit, the FAQ, one of the sticky threads (for those new to yoga or r/yoga). The submission has therefore been removed, but it has also been marked for review by a mod, so if this removal was made in error a mod will approve the submission as soon as possible.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I searched before posting and hope it will be reviewed.
i love analyzing trends, & after seeing the articles about lululemons stock decrease due to sitting on a ~billion dollars worth of inventory, this made me curious to check inventory + launches + pricing model.
so, theres about 118 (give or take) new womens items every week that launch every tuesday, and during the holiday season we even saw double this due to the holiday rush.
on wmtm currently theres 725 items for women. ive seen upwards to 1,000 before...
so my questions are: when in the history of ever have we seen almost ~8 new scuba colors every single week (including FZ HZ & funnel HZ) for almost 3 months straight? 725 SKUS on sale? outlets BRIMMING with inventory they cant turn over? does anyone else remember when lulu was considered luxury/just at the point where it was almost unattainable because of SCARCITY/getting a piece from lulu was a treat rather than the norm? and now the fabric is just....meh or getting worse for 90% of the items?
is this a case of growth/growing pains or a case of fast fashion?
im convinced this is lululemons new pricing model & strategy.
again, my point with my post is for discussion only. my entire closet is lulu so this isnt me shitting on the brand, im still obsessed (i know whats of quality vs whats not). but i have noticed after boxing day my fomo is at an all time low with these latest drops, as i realize the quality of most items isnt worth the price + i genuinely cant keep up with the inventory because there is too much 😂 and this just made me ponder how lulu was never like this. i wonder is this change is because of tiktok and the rise of fashion nova / whitefox type brands, and i also wonder internally if this strategy is actually going to work long term, or if were going to see lululemon in tj maxx soon. lol
will lululemon win without the scarcity model in the coming years? i love to hear your take!
I've never considered lululemon to be a luxury brand. I buy their stuff because their leggings are literally the only brand that my thighs don't rip through and I keep reading about how they are a highly rated company to work for. So long as that's the case, I'll keep buying.
P.S. This is a really interesting post, though. I don't know a lot about what constitutes fast fashion, so this is educational.
Fast fashion is generally inexpensive clothing produced rapidly to follow trends. Weekly new releases is a compelling reason to classify lulu as fast fashion. Slow fashion typically only has ~4 collections, one for each season. Slow fashion also doesn't cycle through styles and patterns and colours quickly, and you don't have to worry about panic buying because even if something goes out of stock it will come back since items/colours aren't discontinued regularly which allows you time to think about purchases. Fast fashion also typically has lax ethics when it comes to manufacturing.
Lululemon is 1000% fast fashion. It's just an expensive fast fashion compared to others like H&M or Shein. But still fast fashion.
I agree, they aren’t luxury and they aren’t fast fashion. They’re simply a high quality athletic wear brand. They’ve been doing the weekly drops and cycling through colours literally forever, it’s nothing new. Just because social media has treated it like “fast fashion” doesn’t mean it is.
I studied fashion in school. Fast fashion clothes are crappy quality that go out of style within a month and fall apart after 2 wears. Lululemon does not fall into this category at all. Just because they come out with a new colour doesn’t mean it’s fast fashion, they’ve had so many of their core styles for literal decades, of course they’ve updated them but the overall style has not changed.
Lululemon was truly the first high quality yoga wear back in the day, it’s been around since the late 90s (probably before a majority of the people in this sub were even born). They were the price they were not because it was “luxury” but because the quality was there. Before Lululemon most workout clothes were made of cotton, it was awful. I even used to work at Nike and Lululemon’s clothes blow them out of the water with their quality. Even my new stuff that many people complain isn’t the same, is still amazing quality. I’ve had to bring back only 2 items in my 20 years of shopping there for quality issues (just a thread coming loose on both).
>they aren’t luxury
They're definitely a luxury athletic brand. They're not up there with LV, Gucci, Chanel, but they're still a luxury legging brand. Another commenter explained it well, if the average price of a pair of leggings is 50$, double that price is definitely luxury.
Lululemon also definitely has a lot of fast fashion characteristics, weekly drops, follows trends, declining quality, lack of ethical/environmental standards like using recycled materials etc. It's mainly missing the really cheap prices and really cheap quality. Just because they're not as bad as Shein or Zara doesn't mean they're innocent.
The bulk of my Lulu is from this era and all of it is holding up beautifully. I prefer my leggings from this time than anything they have currently. I have also have a pullover from 2012 that I still wear every winter and it’s in better condition than the pullovers I bought in 2020.
If you're in Canada, the original company that made them for Lululemon is still around!
Same, even pre 2012, like around 2007-2008, items were still made in Canada and quality was superior. I had a scuba hoodie (that I stupidly gave away) and it’s quality was unmatched! It was thick, warm, stretch panel in the right places, and incomparable to the scuba hoodies that are selling now. I even still have a pair of yoga pants from lulu at that time and quality of those are unmatched too! The material never pulled or snagged like it does now.
TBH I blame the lulu fans. They will buy anything that Lulu throws at them. If people were more selective instead of buying 28372181 scubas in a slightly different shade than the company would have an incentive * to put out better products.
That being said between my discount and WMTM I get lulu cheaper than other brands like Alo.
lab used to be SO LEGIT with style and fabric, i still have some first run lab pieces i grabbed on wmtm and i feel so lucky because now im geniunely like WTF happened to lab 😂 i try to explain to people that Lab was the perfect lulu streetstyle label before but i sound crazy because now its just overpriced trash 😂
this! while i still have some pairs, i cry whenever i think about my old lulu that i sold, thinking the new stuff was "better quality because its new". its not 😩🥲
the attention to detail in those years was also unmatched.
i still have stuff from 2005, when they didnt have ecommerce and you had to go to this tiny showroom in a repurposed apartment in soho (nyc) to buy it. not a pill to be found on any of the clothes i bought back then, they definitely “wal-mart-ized” themselves and cut production quality so they could scale and be profitable. they dont make my favorite tanks anymore (back on track and no limits) so i am not sure what i am going to do when i wear out what i have. i scour ebay for new with tags in those styles but i think ive bought most of what exists in my size 😂
Ugh the back on track and no limits were the BEST! I still have mine too! Also I haven’t bought a running jacket in at least 10 years, because the quality and features on the vintage Lulu vs. now is night & day. Also - bring back the tata tamer. Best boulder holder I’ve even worn on a run!
Hello lemons! Today is the day that lululemon's new terms of service/updated return policy go into effect so we wanted to create a thread for everyone to discuss the changes.
You can click here to read the new terms of service, but the TL;DR here is that "lululemon Essential" members can return sale items as of today.
Further details:
Other notable changes to the TOS:
Feel free to discuss anything related to the new TOS below!
I'm not convinced this is a good thing - it could encourage people to just mass-buy WMTM items and return them to stores. This in turn limits the amount of stuff available online for people who don't have a local store, and costs LLL money for shipping which will likely be passed on to us in terms of pricing.
I appreciate being able to return things that don't fit, but I feel that there should be limits to prevent it from being abused.
There will still be some who abuse it, but I do think that the policy of store credit or exchange only will deter most people from going absolutely bananas on WMTM.
All of Europe can already return WMTM due to EU legislation and it doesn’t lead to the behaviour you speak of.
Super happy about this and immediately bought some items on my wishlist! But I’m curious how this will affect WMTM in the future… more competition for in-demand items? Definitely more options in-store from returns… things that are online, but sometimes it’s nice to see it in person. Will lulu add more WMTM now to keep up with demand?
In terms of adding more inventory, almost certainly not. They operate on a scarcity model and this new change will encourage people to buy more/check out quickly which they directly benefit from
Thanks, and you’re so right. Ultimately this is a business decision that benefits them.
I spoke to an educator in-store this week about the Sweat Collective verification process and he said that no one should lose their current discount unless you are asked to re-verify and you don't.
I can confirm the code still works on my in-cart items after accepting the membership update.
This is the way my email read:
Finally, a membership that’s all about you—and it’s free. Your wellbeing is our reason for being, and we're here to make every step of your journey easier. From the gear you’ll wear to the classes and the community that cheers you on—we've got you.
And you'll still have access to your Sweat Collective offerings, too.*
Returnable in store only might as well be no change for me… there’s a reason I have to shop online in the first place 🤷🏻♀️
Honestly I’d send stuff back and see what happens.
No worries. The GEC normally issues a gift card in those situations.
This is definitely helpful!! About damn time.
When buying chocolate and coffee, it’s easy enough to look for a fair trade certification label. I don’t know how rigorous their standards are, but it’s a lot better than most products. I’m willing to trust that Tony’s Chocolonely and Death Wish coffee were made by workers who were paid for their time and were free to quit.
Electronics are nearly guaranteed to contain conflict minerals that were mined with slave labor. There is something called the Fair Phone, but I have no idea how to buy that in the US.
The Fair Trade website has a page about seafood, but I can’t figure out which (if any) seafood brands are certified. I trust that fresh seafood in the US is probably caught by people who chose to work on a fishing boat. I have no idea where canned seafood comes from.
If you expand your search beyond literal slave labor to include other unethical labor practices, then it becomes completely impossible to avoid. I know about individual problem companies like Amazon, whose workers have to pee in bottles to meet productivity quotas, and Tyson, who is employing children in dangerous poultry factories, but I’m sure there are plenty of other terrible labor practices that don’t make the news.
I just wish that every type of product came with an ethical certification label, so I could choose to support companies that don’t harm humans. Ideally, I would love it if all of these products were required to be made without harming humans, but I realize that that’s too much to ask.
If a serious effort was made to do that it would be responded to by industry lobbyists to come up with some very similar and meaningless labels.
Corporations have already had loopholes for this for quite sometime.
You are at least aware that it is impossible to avoid. So many people think that they make ethical consumption options when in many cases none exist.
I want to know easily as well, but TBH I'm a little scared to be confronted by that information. It's probably a lot more products than we think, and probably enough to make our lives a lot more difficult if we act according to our conscience.
It's probably a lot more products than we think
Yes, but that’s because of the confusing landscape.
Right now, a company that uses slave labor is able to charge less and run their competitors out of business.
If it were easy to see which companies were ethical, then more people (not everyone, but hopefully enough people) would choose to pay extra to keep them in business.
Yeah, I feel like it is the cure, but just a hard pill to swallow unfortunately. I guess that's what it's like having a conscience lol
I hear you, but slavery was only ended* by government decree, not by consumer choice. The same thing needs to happen here -- wealthy countries need to reduce trade with countries that don't take reasonable steps to end slavery within their borders.
*On here before some pedant says "There's still slavery in the US." Sure, but it's illegal and hidden slavery and the government works to stop it, which is a very different situation from 1850.
Yes, but the idea would have to gain a lot of traction before the government would actually take bold action like that. They'd already be pissing off China. They don't want to also piss off 99% of Americans by making them suddenly pay more for everything.
Lmao what? Read your 13th amendment, buddy
Yup, especially the part after "except"
Here’s a list of chocolatiers not connected to child slavery- the list is actually long and Tony’s is not one of them.
Hi, Fair Trade USA here 👋! We understand that it can be difficult to find value-aligned products, especially in a sea of brands who may be making claims without backing them up. Please note that you can be sure that when you see the Fair Trade Certified label, you’re looking at a product that sources ingredients from farms or factories that adhere to our rigorous social and environmental standards. We make sure that certification is only obtained by those following standards including no forced/child labor, fair pay for workers, safe working conditions, environmental concerns, and extra funds provided to workers (Community Development Funds) to be used on projects of their choosing.
For brands with Certified products, we’d be happy to get you started with some to check out! Please note that Fair Trade USA does not certify entire brands, but rather products/ingredients based on sourcing in accordance with our standards. This is so that we can ensure proper compliance with our standards and prevent greenwashing.
Seafood: The Better Fish, Mind Fish Co. (the first certified canned Tuna in the US!)
Clothing: PACT, PrAna, Patagonia
Coffee: Death Wish Coffee, Equator Coffees, Barrie House Coffee Roasters
Chocolate: Lake Champlain Chocolates, Unreal, Lily’s
*EDIT: it's obviously "spending", not "sending" in the title; i'm failing at copy/paste today.
just came across this article on CNBC and thought some people might be interested in it. i think it's easy to forget that those of us relying on WMTM and other discounts to keep our LLL habit alive are not necessarily the majority or really the target audience.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/02/lululemon-lulu-q1-2022-earnings-beat-estimates.html
" Lululemon customers so far aren’t balking at higher prices on the retailer’s leggings and sports bras, Chief Executive Officer Calvin McDonald said Thursday.[...]In late March, Lululemon said it would be raising prices on certain items to help offset higher costs for raw materials, labor and air freight. "
I can afford Lululemon. I've just stopped buying it. I was buying a few pieces almost weekly from the new drops and WMTM. For me, it's a problem of not listening to their customers when making unwanted changes to their top products, shipping destroying my packages and products, and, those little unwanted changes they've made to those star products...well...they've decreased the quality of some of my favorite items. I'm now buying second hand items from past releases. But, honestly, after the last two years I've kinda fallen out of love with LLL. Same thing happened with another one of my favorite brands during the pandemic. Lack of transparency and making unwarranted changes to products and lying to customers that nothing has changed. I've made it over a month without any new purchases, I'm going to try to make it through the rest of 2022 without buying anything from their website or store. I love this sub because of the honest reviews on products. So, I'll keep my ear to the ground and wait to see if things have changed for the better in the next 6 months. Something's off about LLL for me.
yeah. i've also (mostly) stopped buying. i can afford it as well, but i choose to buy at the WMTM price point because i think those prices are closer to the actual value of the pieces in my mind, especially recently. i don't hesitate to pay for quality and innovation but i haven't been thrilled with a lot lately.
I’ve seen this with other brands too. For example, Aritzia has been replacing high quality items with lower quality fabrics & increasing the price. The prices increases are unfortunate but I’d rather pay more & know that the quality of the garment hasn’t decreased (EBB excluded. Some substitutes were made as seen on this sub)
I’m 100% aware I’m not the target audience. I’ve been a customer since 2010 but the days of me spending full price on items that just arrived in store that day are long over with the prices they are at now. I’ve paid full price for a few items (like a black AEJ) that are more versatile.
That said, at all of our local stores including the outlet, they’re ringing people up pretty much non-stop. I’ve even stopped by the mall at 10:30 am on a weekday and there are people buying full price merchandise. I went to a larger LLL store this weekend and they had stanchions because there were so many people in line and like 5-6 cashiers ringing nonstop. I’ve checked store inventory and some of our larger stores are getting 4 items per size per color.
Yep. There is always a line and 3 people working at the tills at my local store.
He’s not wrong. They’ve been using air freight to get product to stores since we reopened in 2020 so price increases were inevitable at some point unfortunately.
I haven’t been ordering from lulu, not only are releases boring, I’m not on board with all the price increases. Of course we’re going to see some rise in prices with the state of the economy but they’re going above and beyond to ensure their own pockets are lined. 5-8% would be reasonable but many of these increases are 10-20%.
I have 0 interest in their sense knit line, $100 for leggings is a splurge and a special treat to me, spending close to $200 on workout leggings is just not my vibe 😵💫 Similarly, their slides are $68 cad so I’d be spending over $70 on summer slides; I personally think that a $48 (even $58!) price tag would be a lot more competitive with other brands, I can get Nike/adidas/under armour slides for $30-$50 (hey even $25 with a sale!) so the $68 tag just doesn’t really make sense.
ETA: if the prices increases do bother you and impact your spending with lululemon, don’t just share your thoughts here- make sure you’re reaching out to the company to let them know, curb your spending for a little while. “customers so far aren't balking at higher prices on the retailer's leggings and sports bras, Chief Executive Officer Calvin McDonald said Thursday.”
I’ve reduced my spending way down in the past 3 months in response to the higher costs. I also wonder if this messaging is a bit of a PR positive move on the company’s part, I wonder really how transparent it really is.
Yeah - it’s not so much a money issue for me anymore. Their stuff has gotten kinda boring. Lots of the same blah silhouettes
Eh to each their own. I personally like the recent brighter colors. They’ve been doing as much as anyone given the setbacks of 2020
*Posted with Mods’ Permission*
Hi all, since our sub has grown so much over these past few months, I adopted r/lululemonBST to create a separate and more centralized place on Reddit where people can buy, sell, and trade lululemon things. �� Please feel free to join!
I also know that there are many concerns/complaints about price gouging and resellers, so there will be a pinned post each month specifically dedicated to retail-or-less prices. I'm not sure how successful this will be, so we'll have to try it out and see. :)
I’m also in the process of getting things set up, so friendly feedback and suggestions are welcome!
Question regarding the retail/less-than thread: how do taxes/shipping figure into this? If you’re selling for a retail+tax/shipping, does it belong there? Or is that thread specifically for out-the-door cost being less than retail?
Mostly asking out of curiosity and future reference
I would think if you’re charging for retail plus tax and shipping it wouldn’t belong there just bc some states don’t pay tax and/or pay less tax than other states and ppl don’t pay shipping when shopping the Lulu site
That’s why I’m asking. I’m hoping u/starfire_fox can give me a solid answer since she’s the mod
I'm very open to suggestions on what people think is fair, but I was thinking that retail+shipping is okay. Taxes/fees wouldn't be included.
So if I was selling a NWT pair of Aligns, it would have to be for $98 + shipping.
That sounds fair to me. Yeah it sucks if you bought something off WMTM that doesn't work for you, but I don't think it's unreasonable to have to take a bit of a hit on the resale. It's on you that you bought a final sale item, and being able to get the majority of your money back is still a win
This sounds reasonable. I can also see how some people might want to recoup all their expenses (taxes included) on WMTM items that can't be returned.
I love this idea!! I feel like the current thread gets hard to keep track of sometimes. Thanks for doing this ��
Thank you! The sub looks great.
Thank you for creating that. If items are posted as separate posts it makes it so much easier to search them on reddit (especially for details in title). Searching in comments is virtually impossible (in my experience).
Awesome!!
Hi r/lululemon,
Earlier this week Lulu announced that they would be piloting a trade in scheme in California & Texas, beginning in May with the plan to expand to online in June.
From the basic information found on cnbc the pilot program will be reliant upon consumer feedback. Currently it appears to be for "gently used" items only, there is mention of items that don't meet standard being recycled. I'm not entirely sure what that means, but it would be great to see those clothing items recycled into new LLL items, from a sustainability standpoint.
I think this is a great first step & I hope LLL can get it off the ground effectively & make the program available world wide.
​
What are your thoughts?
I personally don’t think this has anything to do with sustainability for them. I think they’ve observed how lucrative the resale market is and they are looking to capture the revenue for themselves (or remove items from the resale market that are undercutting their sales). I’ll be curious to see the gift card values and the resale prices to see if it’s actually competitive with current resale rates. Even if it’s not competitive they’ll still be capturing the segment of people who cluelessly/lazily donate their garments.
�� I also think that they need to adjust their returns and exchanges policy if they are going to roll this out. They won't, because that doesn't make sense for business, but I'm definitely turned off by the fact that they want to make even more money off of customers and I still can't turn something I hated after I worked out in it once (as opposed to Athleta who had a workout return policy).
It’s true, Athleta’s return policy is AMAZING! Their clothing is perfect for work events and being around family - but when I want to look stunning nothing compares to LLL!!
Ya I would definitely foresee these resale items being final sale. That being said... making WMTM items not final sale would be a good starts... that would probably cut a significant chunk from the resale market ... how many times I have ordered wmtm and resold on posh NWT because it didn’t work for me ��
I’ve had a very small number of items bought in store completely change size after doing an initial wash (i.e., before wearing) and hang dry, to the point of being unwearable (I know items get stretched out in store, but this was way way beyond that). The worst one I tried doing a return for online, explaining that while I know items in stores get stretched out from being tried on, this was beyond anything I’d experienced before and not consistent across the entire garment. They said no, that’s not our problem, and so I was never able to wear them, and they’ve just been sitting in my closet for years now. I should really just sell them.
Well the so-called pre owned market is a lucrative one for sure. Huge margins under the guise of sustainability. In Europe we have websites that already do that. They accept your clothes in mint condition or more for cheap and resell the items are ridiculously high prices. So for example a blouse is accepted for 2-5 euros sold back again around 30-50 euros depending on the brand. So I’m very sceptical with such business models. It’s even better way to make huge profits and margin at virtually no cost plus the good PR for them.
Entirely agreed. This is capitalism at its finest. Figure out a way to market to the consumer to get more money from them at lower cost to the company. They'll issue gift cards for much less than some things fetch on the resale market, but said cards aren't enough to buy something new, this ensuring you spend more money with them. They'll mark up the resale items for far more than what they paid, thus ensuring they profit more.
All the while, they sell you on this by claiming its for sustainability.
They wouldn’t be able to do any of this if people didn’t love what they made and were willing to spend $$ on it.
I agree completely. There was a story on the national news here last night about successful sellers on places like Poshmark (they also talked about sustainability) and my first thought was it's more about selling hard to find items to make money or it's sellers needing the cash not wanting to sit on their wardrobes
"For items that don’t make the quality cut, lululemon will recycle them through a longstanding partnership with Canadian reverse logistics firm Debrand."
I too would be interested to see how much they actually “give back” for the item. If I’m only going to get a $30 gift card for EUC Wunder Unders or $5 for a CRB, for example, I’d rather keep it, donate or resell on another platform.
I don't know what they actually give people for them but they resell them for not much of a discount. I found a pair of Aligns in a color that I'd been looking for and they were $70.
What is lululemon’s stance on fair trade
Key Considerations on Lululemon’s Stance on Fair Trade:
Sourcing Practices: Lululemon emphasizes responsible sourcing and aims to ensure that their products are made in safe and fair working conditions. They work with suppliers who adhere to ethical labor practices.
Sustainability Initiatives: The company has committed to sustainability and environmental responsibility, which includes efforts to reduce their carbon footprint and use sustainable materials.
Fair Trade Certification: While Lululemon does not exclusively use Fair Trade Certified factories, they have expressed support for fair labor practices and are involved in initiatives that promote fair wages and safe working conditions.
Transparency: Lululemon has made strides in increasing transparency about their supply chain and the conditions under which their products are made. They provide information on their website about their sourcing practices and sustainability goals.
Community Engagement: The brand often engages with communities and initiatives that promote social responsibility, although specific Fair Trade partnerships may not be highlighted.
Takeaway: While Lululemon supports ethical labor practices and sustainability, they do not exclusively focus on Fair Trade certification. If Fair Trade is a priority for you, consider researching specific products or brands that are fully Fair Trade certified.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.