what sets this apart from audacity?

Yay you changed the name

Tenacity is the FOSS fork of audacity after it was acquired

audacity man!

Audio Editor: Audacity.

DAW: Ardour.

https://www.ocenaudio.com

TAAFT just look it up and you'll see tons of free options for audio editors. Kweli Kush blog has more sources you may find useful as well...

Besides Reaper, Audacity is another option.

Reaper is powerful and flexible, but has a higher learning curve.

Audacity is not as powerful but is much simpler to use. If you eventually do anything more serious with audio like complex song remixes or recording or mixing bands, you'll outgrow Audacity pretty quickly.

Reaper is probably the best one.

Reaper

Lots of folk suggesting Reaper - and it's very good, BUT
Reaper isn't actually FREE.
If you benefit from it please buy a very reasonably priced license... If you're going to pirate software, it might as well be something (a bit more "industry standard") from a big corporation that won't be too adversely affected. (No need to rip off generous developers).

Audacity is actually free to use, fully cross platform and open source.

If you fancy something without a GUI, sox and ffmpeg are great but the learning curve is much greater.

Audacity is the obvious tool. (Free, too)

As for not "sound edited", it will sound edited - but not to the ears of 99.999% of the population, unless you totally overdo the noise reduction.

You can use WavePad or alternatives like Movavi to clean up noise and raise the volume.

https://podcast.adobe.com/en/enhance-speech-v2

Already mentioned but yeah, audacitys still the go-to for free. Its got noise reduction + compression that can boost volume without sounding too fake

FL Studio isn't free, but it's good.

Audio tool (online) seemed okay to me.

Sound Trap would give you very basic tools.

GarageBand on Mac is really almost the same thing as Logic minus some features.

Waaaaaay back I started with the light version of cubase that came with my audio interface. Often that is the best way to go. You will likely need an interface and they come almost all with startup software. That said, Reaper is a great starting point and it is free.

Look into Ableton, I think they have some free resources to get started.

Audacity is KILLER in terms of efficiency. Do it up.

Reaper reaper reaper reaper.

Check out Reaper or Cakewalk (I prefer Cakewalk more). Also there are some in-browser options, you can Google them. :)

What’s wrong with audacity?

Reaper is really good

Thanks for your answers.

What software are you planning on using?

This sounds great! I usually audio edit my own voiceover work because I also use Izotope RX8 which gives a smooth, crisp, and clean sound. But I was wondering if you do mix & mastering for music/songs?

I’ll keep you in mind, I have a few private projects coming up and I may need editing so I’ll pm u when I do them.

Hi, i talk as a member of a community of community of script writers AND voice actors (both male and female) and maybe there is something for you, interested?

I use Audacity to edit my weekly podcast. Free and easy.

Did editing in Audacity for a time. Free and capable. Then I switched to Hindenburg Journalist. (I think it goes by Hindenburg Lite now). Best $99 I ever spent. If you want free, Audacity will do the job, but I SWEAR by Hindenburg. I’ve edited over 100 episodes with it, and it is flawless.

Technically, Reaper costs $60 to license, but you can use it in evaluation mode forever, provided that you don't mind a five second "nag screen" reminding you to get a license. None of the functions are limited in evaluation mode.

Yeah, Audacity will do that for you for free

OcenAudio or Audacity.

https://www.ocenaudio.com

http://www.audacityteam.org

Reaper has a generous 60 day fully functional trial and is only US$60.

https://www.reaper.fm

!

Full disclosure, I have not tried this. That being said, I have been part of a team that developed a proprietary data-compression system for arcade game audio, and I’ve also worked with data-compressed audio for VTech, LeapFrog, Bungie Game Studios, Cyan, Firaxis Games, and others. I also trained at Texas Instruments on their proprietary data-compression hardware and software. And from that experience I can be reasonably confident that this cannot work the way you describe it working, because of how MP3 audio gets compressed. The MP3 compression algorithm uses, among other things, predictive compression referencing lookup tables, and if you alter chunks of audio from any compressed file, the predictions that were used to render the original file will be useless. So it will have to make new predictions in order to render the edited file. Which means it will have to uncompress and re-compress the file, allowing new predictions to render the new version of the audio.

It’s like you’re claiming to have developed software that makes solid objects fall upward. Or maybe time travel. Or both.

I’m also wondering what problems this software is supposed to solve. If you’re getting MP3s to work with from clients who need them edited, you’re doing it wrong. So that’s your problem, not the pesky necessity to uncompress those files and recompress them when you’re done editing. The solution is to insist on delivery of raw files. Rendering to an MP3 should always, always, be the very last step in any editing/mixing/mastering workflow.

This is snake oil, folks.

I'm glad to see this, as non destructive mp3 editing is great for things like editing ads out of podcasts.

But you should change the name, lol.

Your first paragraph is misleading but the second paragraph is interesting. Start with that one. Editing based on text descriptions is cool and relatively new. The first thing you talk about is not accurate or interesting. Also cum is a thing that most people will associate your product with.

if you want anyone to trust it make a proper site fronted. even ai can make you fronted much better in few min. (that look good)

Congrats! This sounds cool!