TL;DR
Textbooks
Several textbooks are frequently recommended for learning abstract algebra. Dummit and Foote is often cited as one of the best comprehensive resources, although it may be challenging for beginners due to its depth [1:7],
[5:2]. For those new to the subject, Herstein's Topics in Algebra offers a more approachable introduction, focusing on explaining concepts with words rather than equations
[4:2],
[5:3]. Fraleigh's Abstract Algebra is praised for its clarity and abundance of exercises, making it suitable for self-study
[5:1].
Online Courses and Videos
MIT OpenCourseWare is recommended for structured learning through online courses [1:5]. Additionally, YouTube channels like Socratica and Eliott724 provide helpful video tutorials, particularly for group theory
[1:1]. These platforms can offer visual and auditory explanations that complement textbook learning.
Free Resources
For those looking for free options, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications by Judson is available online and provides a thorough exploration of the subject [4:1]. This resource is particularly useful for students seeking a cost-effective way to study abstract algebra.
Additional Recommendations
Other recommendations include Visual Group Theory by Nathan Carter, which offers a gentler introduction to the subject [1:3], and Gallian's book, known for its extensive examples and hand-holding approach
[5:5]. For those interested in specific applications like commutative algebra or algebraic geometry, books by Miles Reid and Michael Artin are suggested
[2:2].
Study Tips
Engaging actively with the material is crucial. Completing exercises, attempting to prove theorems before reading solutions, and making conjectures can significantly enhance understanding [1:4]. It's also beneficial to discuss problems and topics with knowledgeable individuals when confused
[5:4].
I'm struggling with my abstract algebra course, does anyone have any resources they like or think are helpful ?
What book are you using?
Abstract algebra by beachy
How many of the exercises are you doing?
How many theorems are you proving/trying to prove before reading the proof?
How many generalizations/conjectures of your own are you making?
If any of those are “none”, then change that! You can’t read a textbook like a novel
It looks like a good book; I think reading it thoroughly would be your best bet.
Visual Group Theory by Nathan Carter might be a gentler introduction that would help you start understanding your actual textbook.
MIT online courseware
Dummit and Foote is what you need. By far the best book out there. Herstein's books are a close second.
That’s like someone saying “I’m having trouble reading this novel ” so you give them an encyclopedia. D&F is quite terse from what I’ve worked through in it.
So is it terse or is it an encyclopedia? Sounds contradictory.
I am a little unsure on what to read after John b fraleighs a first course in abstract algebra and Joseph rotmans Galois theory. I was thinking miles Reid’s undergraduate commutative algebra, any suggestion of other reading to do. For reference I love math and I’m in ninth grade and I don’t need much motivation. Thanks in advance!
Do commutative algebra only if your goal is algebraic geometry. Two popular books I don’t know are one by Aluffi and another by Michael Artin. Also, consider learning another subject. If you’ve already learned multivariable calculus, consider Differential Topology by Guillemin and Pollack. Or a book about the differential geometry of curves and surfaces.
Do exercises from those books.
Thank you for the advice, but what I implied was I did all the the exercises from both of them, sorry to not mention since I think it’s always an integral part of the reading to do.
Then, Try something little different, Arkadii M. Slinko.
If you haven't done much in discrete mathematics or linear algebra, you might want to study those to get a feel for areas where abstract algebra is applied a lot. There are plenty of good texts available, and some of the good ones are free. Also, linear algebra has applications to other areas of algebra. Representation theory, in particular.
For discrete mathematics I recommend A Cool Brisk Walk Through Discrete Mathematics. It's a nice text, and the author has made it available free online. Hard copies are sold, too. I also find it pleasant for leisure reading, having passed my undergraduate courses in discrete math decades ago.
I liked Visual Group Theory by Nathan Carter as a supplement to help solidify my feeling for group theory.
Since you expressed some interest in commutative algebra, here's a couple you might want to put on the back burner for motivation: Cox, Little & O'Shea - Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms is a nice introduction to algebraic geometry. Eisenbud's Commutative Algebra is intro graduate level, but if you can, say, borrow a copy through interlibrary loan, I recommend reading some of the chapter introductions and other prose to give you a "peek over the mountain," as it were.
For example:
Math: Getsummath
RLA: readtheory.org
What level do you recommend for read theory in order to pas rla ?
Hello. I’ll be spending practically all my time this summer preparing for a course in abstract algebra next fall. The course uses Dummit & Foote. As it stands, I’m planning on reading Artin’s Algebra and watching the associated lectures by Benedict Gross on YouTube. Are there any other helpful resources you guys are aware of? I’m particularly interested in a friendly/intuitive approach to algebra (although I’d still like it to be rigorous).
Herstein's Topics in Algebra is a good introduction and tends to explain concepts using words rather than equations. He makes difficult topics easy to follow, but the book is fairly dated and doesn't use modern notation, and doesn't go into nearly as much depth as you'll see in Dummit and Foote.
Found a copy of Herstiens book on the side of the road, and decided to go through it. Honestly just the first couple of sections really changed how I looked at mathematics and was instrumental in my decision to pursue math as my degree. It is dated(and I have either the first or second edition) but it's so easy to follow, so long as you do the exercises and try to prove the lemmas.
I highly recommend it
I know that this sub likes to recommend Pinter, and I like to promote freely available resources, like Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications by Judson.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Thank you so much :)
And also, I don't yet have much mathematical maturity, or any prior knowledge of abstract algebra.
I like Dummit and Foote, but that’s just me, and probably isn’t the best first time intro to abstract algebra
I used it as a first time resource, and really liked it. Definitely requires the reader to be able to admit to themselves that they don’t understand a proof or topic, and reread the section more than once. Also good to have a knowledgable person on hand to discuss problems and topics when confused.
For an introductory text, I recommend Herstein's Topics in Algebra. It slowly walks you through groups, rings, vector spaces, modules, fields, linear transformations and other selected topics.
Has plenty of exercises and doesn't skip over any details.
Gallian's book is a pretty good place to start.
He's pretty hand-holdy and does a TON of examples
I remember Pinter being widely recommended.
I got mine in PDF, Abstract Algebra 7Ed (Fraleigh) it’s easy to understand and there are a lot of exercises to work on. :)
Are there any good (prefferably affordable) books about group, field and ring theory for someone who just wants to learn about those?
Life pro-tip: every book becomes highly affordable when you use library genesis. But of course I’d never recommend something like that.
Abstract Algebra by Durbin gets recommended by my university. Not brilliant but it likely covers what you’re looking for
Lmao thanks for the pro tip (and the book suggestion)
As this is basic abstract algebra, there is no need to get a book for that. Lecture notes would do equally well. For instance, look at
https://math.berkeley.edu/~apaulin/AbstractAlgebra.pdf
If you want to go further than that, just let me know.
You are right, thanks for the pdf (although I really shouldnt click on links sent on the reddit replies lmao), this will help me!
You should not click on links before verifying that they are genuine.
Judson's text is available free online: http://abstract.ups.edu/download.html
I second this. It’s pretty good for self studying, especially if you’re a beginner. Although, I will say that some of the later chapters, like chapter 11 on the isomorphism theorems, are not the best if you’re seeing this material for the first time. So, if you do manage to get that far with this book, I would suggest referring to a different text for alternative wording of theorems, more examples, etc. if you start feeling stuck.
With that being said, I would still recommend this book for a beginner because it will allow you to get a good general idea of these mathematical objects without being too overwhelmed by them. Dummit and Foote, for example, is not a very good text for a beginner and for self study. It is really more like a reference book, that you might find handy later on, but I really wouldn’t recommend starting with it. I think you’ll feel overwhelmed by it.
Hungerford.
Kidding, of course. What I really meant was Hungerford. He has two books. Try the introductory one.
Another good one is Gallian.
Late undergrad to beginning grad you can try Papa Hungerford, Dummit and Foote, Aluffi, and Lang.
I study better with a physical book so I recommend A Book of Abstract Algebra by Pinter
I'll look into it, thanks
I graduated with a bachelor's in Math probably 20 years ago now and quickly went on to do something else, never really revisiting math again. Occasionally I would miss the wow moments when something clicked but there are parts I don't miss at all. So getting back to my question...I absolutely loathed topology back then; not sure why but loved our intro into Abstract through rings/fields/groups. (Only my final year;not sure if this is normal for undergrad). It's such a long time ago that I now only remember the gist of what I've learned in Abstract. I would like to get back into it just for fun and was thinking of what book or online source would best help me to slowly crawl back into the this? My Linear Algebra knowledge is still okayish as such a large part of my studies focused around it but not much was retained from the former.
The level of undergraduate algebra courses varies significantly. Given the time passed, I don't think a graduate level text would be suitable.
A Book of Abstract Algebra by Pinter is very accessible and it's available as a Dover reprint. A First Course in Abstract Algebra by Fraleigh is a popular prescribed text for undergraduate students, as is Contemporary Abstract Algebra by Gallian.
There's also Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications by Judson, which is available free online.
Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote is the standard prescribed text for graduate students. It's very comprehensive and it has lots of examples and exercises.
Personally, I like Basic Algebra by Knapp, which is available for free here. Alternatively, you could try Basic Algebra I by Jacobson, which is available as a Dover reprint.
Lang's Algebra (GTM) is famously difficult to learn from (though an excellent reference), but his Undergraduate Algebra (UTM) is very accessible.
Aluffi's Algebra: Chapter 0 is excellent, but I don't think it's suitable. I haven't read it yet, but his other book, Algebra: Notes from the Underground, is also well reviewed at the undergraduate level.
I'd also mention that with a lot of graduate level algebra topics, you could be better served by buying texts specific to the individual topics.
CC'ing my answer to a related question.
Visual Group Theory is a great textbook for developing intuition for the concept of group actions. I wish I knew about it when i was taking abstract algebra
I got my introduction to abstract algebra my senior year in college, 1985 it was, and by mysterious vicissitudes of fortune, my textbook has stayed with me all this time. It was Fraleigh's third edition. I recently picked it up again and started working through it. My rusty math gears don't work quite like they used to. I've hunted around for what would be a superior text for self study, and nothing has stood out. What I'd really like is a way to check my work on the exercises.
Since you have a suitable background in algebra you can try
S. Lang Algebra
Jacobson, Basic Algebra
Grillet, Abstract Algebra
I’m going to recommend a book called Groups, Rings, and Fields, by DAR Wallace. It is part of the Springer undergraduate mathematical series (SUMS). You should be able to get a used copy for just a few dollars. One warning: there are some typos in it, but they are very easy to spot, and they don’t present any problems.
Despite doing most of my work in analysis, abstract algebra really was my favorite.
Have fun, best wish 🙋🏻♂️
Online sources of help that actually walk you through the steps to aid in comprehension as opposed to merely providing an answer. Please and thank you.
I ran into this site; https://yutsumura.com while studying for quals. It's undergrad level more than grad level.
However, a lot of the time there are no "steps" in an abstract algebra problem, and the solution is the steps. A proof provides all the important details why it is true. If you have a hard time understanding some solutions, feel free to post them here; people can help work through the solutions with you. Based on what you've said, a good goal in this class for you, should be to reach the point where you can read the solutions and see why they are true, usually without needing someone else to give you clarification. You might need to go back to your text and reread the definition or the statement of some theorems, though, and that is fine.
Thank you for good information.
I am currently an undergraduate. the algebraic courses that i have done are two courses on linear algebra, two groups and rings courses, and one course on geometry. I want to go a bit deeper into algebra, and I am looking for books that would be quite versatile that i could read this summer. I don't want to go deeply ontl one single area(this summer), say galois theory or commutative algebra. however, I do want to learn more algebra.
In the future, I want to study something related to geometry or topology. maybe algebraic topology and algebraic geometry.
I am looking for a book with lots of interesting examples and problems that go beyond the standard undergraduate curriculum and that would prepare me for future studies in algebra. I want to have more practice with algebra through jnteresting examples and also learn new theory, without going into something very specific and restricting myself to it(e.g. Reading a full book exclusively on galois theory)
Ideally, I would like this book to have a lot of geometric context
Knapp has two books "Basic Algebra" and a follow-up "Advanced Algebra" where the goal is to cover all the algebra "every mathematician should know".
So they are very complete, covering essentials from elementary number theory, linear algebra, multilinear algebra, groups, rings, galois theory, modules and then in the advanced book going more into modern number theory, homological algebra and algebraic geometry.
Super versatile books, probably the most complete textbook in Algebra, though not sure about the geometric context or the examples as you prefer them.
It sounds like Algebra by Michael Artin would be right up your alley. He is an algebraic geometer and brings a long of linear algebraic and geometric context. And it also covers a wide swath of modern abstract algebra.
Artin's a great book that grows on you! The more I read it, the more I appreciate his geometric "side quests" and geometry/linear algebra-based thought process. His proofwriting is also incredibly lucid and clean (although like Rudin's proofs, the reader may have to fill in some not-totally-trivial gaps).
On the other hand, Herstein is also great book, also right at that undergrad/grad level boundary, and he takes a totally different more purely algebraic approach. I like his commentary, and it's cool that he does some of the most important proofs in two or more different ways. The exercises are great. But his proofs are chatty/longwinded and often integrated into the text. I wish he would confine the commentary to outside the proofs (and clearly delineate the proofs with ∎)....
But if OP has already had a full year of undergrad algebra, he/she might just go with Dummit and Foote for bigger bang for the buck. Unfortunately, not the most engaging textbook, and it's too much detail -- it's easy to lose the forest for the trees. (Or maybe I just haven't reached that level of mathematical sophistication to appreciate D&F.)
I think if u already know some basic algebra u should probably start reading Hartshorne algebraic geometry, it's essentially a geometry book with lots of examples and exercises, it goes beyond undergrad curriculum though it's quite easy and readable as an undergrad, and it doesn't require too deep prerequisite knowledge, while involving lots of algebra and building algebraic geometry from ground up. But if u encounter any difficulty in the book, say if there is something in algebra that u don't understand then u can refer to some standard text to learn that, or ask your prof. But there are some important things (though elementary) that aren't mentioned in the book and that could be a problem, but it's a great book in general and will allow u to learn algebra and algebraic geometry and topology with relative ease, and if u want to study algebraic geometry u will have to read it eventually anyway. So it is easy, covers lots of subjects including algebra but none too deeply and is quite versatile. It has lots of geometric context also obviously.
Edit: Why is everybody downvoting me? OP asked for a geometry based book that has a lot of algebra as well (OK maybe Hartshorne doesn't have algebra directly but it requires a lot of it and also involves some category theory indispensable to any algebraist or algebraic geometer) and doesn't dig too deeply on any topic. So I thought reading it would be a good idea. Also I don't understand why Hartshorne gets so much hate, it's like if u know some basic stuff and want to skim through geometry it is still the best resource, Mumford's red book is too detailed and functorial for a beginner, u need to be quite categorified already, and what else, read EGA??? That would be crazy! So Hartshorne even today is the best resource for beginners.
probably because it's not an algebra textbook
well that's true but u don't have to learn algebra from an algebra book itself, u can learn large parts of it through other subjects. For example I learned a large part of homological algebra reading literature on algebraic topology directly. Also Op asked for an algebra book with geometry in it and I don't think there is any in the market apart from the hardcore algebraic geometry ones. So i thought Hartshorne would be a good choice. And I have myself read the book quite early on, and know many others who have also. They are all quite happy they did and the book has benefitted them also.
Lang
Probably Dummit & Foote would be a great read for you. After the basics of two-semesters of undergrad algebra, it also discusses some homological algebra, module theory, has a quick intro to commutative algebra etc. I like their writing style too. P.S.: you definitely need to be doing a lot of their exercises... or else you're actually missing out on some important related concepts.
You have to be patient with this book but imo, every was worth a read.
I am an undergrad in a CS program looking to work in theoretical computer science research. Unfortunately, I have had very little exposure to discrete math. I am hoping to remedy that over the summer. Whats the best way to self learn abstract algebra, particularly group theory, to a level of at least basic understanding? Some other stuff I want to learn include the basics of number theory, combinatorics, and graph theory (stuff that are I am guessing staples in a discrete math course).
I tried going through MIT's Math for CS course, but I feel I need to solve problems to actually understand the material. I find this hard without the feedback a physical classroom provides. Any suggestions are welcome!
I agree that doing exercises without feedback isn't as helpful as you'd want it to be. I'd be more than happy to look over anything you'd feel like sharing. I know we've started a discord from r/math just for study of a particular book, but I'd be more than happy to set one up or participate in one for general learning! Love that you're pushing yourself to learn more. Let me know what works for you.
Forgot to add that I have a book recommendation. "A Book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles Pinter. It's a dover book, roughly $15 IIRC, and very well written for the layman.
You are the light this world needs. Would you make a post to r/math if you start a general learning discord?
How about studying Rubik's cube instead? You can learn most of the basic group theory through that while building a program that impllement the ideas. Not to mention picking up a party trick. There several books analyzing the cube on different levels.
I have this book by David Joyner called Adventures in Group Theory subtitled, Rubik's cube, Merlin's Machine, and Other Mathematical Toys. It is designed sort of for people generally interested in mathematics. So non-professional math. The tone is light.
It doesn't develop a solver but any programming language with a full set of operators on lists and sets can be used to create the operators necessary to explore the Rubik's group structure fully as discussed, instead of just reading the theorems and the proofs. I find learning generally easier if you have a goal in sight.
Another really intereting group theory puzzle to develop on is Polya Pattern Ananlysis. You can find examples and codes for it in the book Mastering Mathematica by John Gray. It is a great read to test your understanding of group theory.
Try A Book of Abstract Algebra by Charles Pinter. It’s not too rough. It’s exactly what my advisor recommended after I asked him the same question.
Dummit and Foote is the best text to introduce abstract algebra in my opinion.
I've seen this book recommended almost every time someone asks for book recommendations for algebra. Is it really that good?
I'm a high schooler and I've done algebra from "a book of Abstract algebra". Should I do it again from dummit and Foote or should I focus on other stuff like real analysis?
Dummit and Foote is much more encyclopedic than A Book of Abstract Algebra, in that it talks about a huge amount of stuff. I think the style of writing in it is a bit less easy to read than Pinter's book, so I tend to recommend Pinter to people who haven't done any algebra at all before, but it's pretty ideal for somebody who already has a little understanding of, say, basic group theory.
Depends how well you know algebra. You will almost certainly learn something if you read through Dummit and Foote.
Artin's Algebra is what we use for Algebra, which I like a lot. 6.042 (Discrete Math) is really a class for learning to prove things - if you struggle with proofs, How to Prove It and Book of Proof are good starter resources I used to skip 6.042.
A student here wrote an awesome book with around 100 pages of abstract algebra that I'm using to self-study along with Artin's book. You can find it here. It has quality content like this.
A Student writing a 100 page books sounds so impressive :O. I kinda do struggle with proofs, I'll look through your recommendations, thanks!
Best resources for learning abstract algebra
Here are some excellent resources for learning abstract algebra:
Textbooks:
Online Courses:
YouTube Channels:
Problem-Solving Resources:
Study Groups and Forums:
Recommendation: Start with a textbook like Dummit and Foote for a solid foundation, and supplement your learning with online courses and video lectures for diverse perspectives. Engaging with a community, such as Math Stack Exchange, can also enhance your understanding through discussion and problem-solving.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.