Understanding Match Cuts
Match cuts are a powerful cinematic technique used to create seamless transitions between scenes or shots, enhancing storytelling by connecting visual elements. They can imply continuity, metaphorical connections, or thematic parallels without explicit explanation [1:1]. This technique is appreciated for its ability to draw viewers deeper into the narrative, sometimes making edits appear invisible
[1:2].
Classic Examples
Several films are renowned for their use of match cuts. For instance, Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" famously uses a match cut transitioning from a bone thrown by a prehistoric ape to a spacecraft orbiting Earth, symbolizing technological evolution [4]. Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" employs match cuts to transition from Marion Crane’s eye to the shower drain, creating a visual and thematic link between her life and death.
Modern Usage
Contemporary filmmakers continue to utilize match cuts creatively. Edgar Wright, known for his stylized editing, often employs match cuts in films like "Hot Fuzz" and "Scott Pilgrim vs. The World" to enhance comedic timing and visual storytelling [5:1]. These cuts can also be seen in Christopher Nolan's "Inception," where match cuts help blur the lines between dream and reality.
Experimental Films and Video Essays
Experimental films and video essays frequently use match cuts to construct narratives from disparate sources. Christian Marclay's "The Clock" is an example where match cuts between scenes featuring clocks create a cohesive dialogue across different films [5:1]. Similarly, György Pálfi's "Final Cut" crafts a narrative entirely from clips of existing films, showcasing the potential of match cuts in experimental storytelling
[5:5].
Impact on Editing Styles
Match cuts have influenced various editing styles, contributing to both traditional continuity editing and more avant-garde approaches. Films like "The Atomic Cafe" demonstrate how match cuts can convey political messages by juxtaposing historical footage [5:7]. This technique underscores the versatility of match cuts in both mainstream and experimental cinema.
One of my favourite cinematic techniques is the match cut.
In fact, I think it is one of the most powerful storytelling tools we have. It allows you to say something, without saying anything, to imply things without showing them, to make metaphors and much, much more. It is such a simple, yet brilliant way to bring context to your story.
So for Anything Goes Sunday, I'd like to share a video I made diving into how filmmakers use it to enhance their stories + some great examples.
But I also want to start a discussion. What are some of your favorite cinematic techniques? What is something that if you see in a movie it immediately makes you feel like the filmmaker truly cares. Would love to hear it!
Cheers!
I miss “obvious” editing being more common in movies. Match cuts, wipes, jump cuts, dissolves, etc. The whole “editing should be invisible” and “you should never notice an edit” philosophy is one way to approach things but it’s not the only way. A good match cut can grab the audience’s attention and pull them further into the story.
Absolutely! I love it when I "notice" something intentional, it immediately makes me enjoy the movie more as it feels like everything has purpose and the director really cares about it.
great video. i've always liked match cuts too, but now i know the name for them :)
You are very welcome, happy you enjoyed it and now you know what they are called as well :D
Back in my TV news days you were judged by your match cuts.
I’m currently in tv news. I’m curious on what you mean by this.
Here goes my attempt to explain.
Solid, beautiful match cuts help the viewer disappear into the story. They trick they mind into seeing seamless action, or movement. Much more so than a wide-med-tight sequence. A match cut can fool the viewer into thinking there were no edits at all, or that there were multiple cameras at a shoot. You can edit any type shot coming out of a match cut. This type of shooting and editing shows dedication to craft and storytelling.
It takes time to shoot this way, an eye to recognize a capture opportunity, very comfortable subjects, receptive action, without staging, and an understanding reporter. You see them most often in feature stories as those are usually shot apart from the daily news grind.
There are great examples of stories with match cuts out there on the web. I use to take a bit of pride with my match cuts back when Betacam roamed the earth and we edited tape to tape. My personal fav was a feature on a Blacksmith who made two ton furniture. That shoot was tailor made for match cuts. I wish I had it.
The editing may be easier now but shooting for match cuts will never change.
That's interesting, mind telling more?
Very cool!! I learned match cuts
Nice video, thanks! I'm gonna explore your channel for more content.
Thanks, happy you found it interesting!
I counted three cuts
Looks like it was two setups on a oner where one of the setups went to a longer lens.
u/bigfootswillie I saw that wipe too but in the context of the action before and after the wall there was really no reason to cut cause it was the same lens and the guy wound up pretty much where you would expect him to just moving through the space.
Also the guy at the end of the shot smoking the cigarette, I don't trust him.
Yea I think that’s probably not actually a cut here but maybe was planned to be there in case they felt they needed it
Yeah always leave yourself an out
3 cuts, plus three good possible transition spots though wouldn’t see need for it as in same location/set and an easy follow
What movie is this?
Good Night And Good Luck. Directed by George Clooney. It's very good. Was nominated for several Oscars.
Ok will watch it
3
I'm writing a suspense scene where a character has drugs in his trunk and a cop follows him, then ultimately pulls him over.
I have many types of shots and perspectives. (FYI I'm directing this)
-interior 2 shot of the car -insert of the speedometer -insert of the cop in the rearview mirror -c/u of the main character -etc etc
What I've found, is I have no idea how to properly format this. If feels like each shot I switch between, it takes up a new line and more page real estate.
For instance, when I write:
INSERT - REARVIEW MIRROR
The police car still follows, but half the distance.
Brent focuses back on the road. A beat. His eyes dart over to Perry; still asleep. He’s alone.
That last line, isn't a part of the insert but I'm afraid people might read it as such. I also think if I put a new scene heading that's way too much as well. How do you handle popping out of an insert back into the scene so the audience knows?
Seems fine.
Especially since you’re directing
>Documentary about the art of film editing. Clips are shown from many groundbreaking films with innovative editing styles.
Excellent! makes me want to be more daring with music production - creative editing can suggest so much.
My dumb ass was kind of hoping this would be about the movie The Cutting Edge lol. That's fine, I'll see my enemies to lovers figure skating movie loving self out :P
(no shade to the actual documentary tho)
The OP has provided the following Submission Statement for their post:
> Documentary about the art of film editing. Clips are shown from many groundbreaking films with innovative editing styles.
If you believe this Submission Statement is appropriate for the post, please upvote this comment; otherwise, downvote it.
Hi! New experimental film fan here. I just wanted to ask if a film exists that cuts together multiple films to create a cohesive dialogue/action?
I watched a snippet of Christian Marclay's "The Clock", a film where he creates a montage of scenes that feature clocks. There was a scene from the 2009 movie "The Taking of Pelham 123" where Walter Garber played by Denzel Washington asked, "what are you staring at?" while looking towards the left side of the screen. This was followed by a scene from the 2004 film Spiderman 2 where Aziz is staring at peter parker towards the right side of the screen. The latter character didn't speak (before cutting to peter), but that was an intriguing moment nonetheless, where the two scenes kind of fit together. The concept of cutting together multiple films and creating a cohesive dialogue and/or action isn't anything complicated or novel, but I was unable to find such a film/video (granted, I did google for like 10 min). That is why I am asking u guys if there are any such films/videos out there that does this, and does this "technique" have a name? Is this a thing in the film world? (I know supercut is a thing, but this isn't cutting together scenes that feature the same theme but instead cutting together scenes so that they make sense)
p.s I'm also kind of a music producer, and I like thinking about sampling (using existing work and creating something new) in different formats such as, in this case, film.
​
Any response is appreciated!
​
Edit:
Thank you for the responses! Didn't know this was a thing. I have a lot to look into. You guys are awesome!
I believe what you're referring to is called a Found Footage film. New School University has an entire class on it that has students make one by splicing actual analog film together. Also Atomic Cafe is the most famous example of using this technique, and IIRC was notably made by George W Bush's nephew or cousin. Also, personally, I've seen it in a theatre and love it, and highly recommend it. It was available for free on YouTube last time I checked.
>The Atomic Cafe is a 1982 American documentary film directed by Kevin Rafferty, Jayne Loader and Pierce Rafferty. It is a compilation of clips from newsreels, military training films, and other footage produced in the United States early in the Cold War on the subject of nuclear warfare. Without any narration, the footage is edited and presented in a manner to demonstrate how misinformation and propaganda was used by the U.S. government and popular culture to ease fears about nuclear weapons among the American public.
^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
The general practice of combining shots for this purpose is just called continuity editing, but that's not specific to found footage work. The Anti-Banality Union did some similar stuff, taking movies that deal with a specific theme and building out a narrative from that.
I really like how they're using the editing to create a political message. Will look more into this. Thank you!
Los Angeles Plays Itself is the first thing that comes to mind, or maybe the avant-garde films of Joseph Cornell (most famous for his surreal dioramas)
Thank you! Looks very interesting, adding it to my list.
Don’t know if it’s what you ask, but György Pálfi's Final Cut (2012) is a feature film with a story, entirely made up of clips from other films.
This is most certainly what I meant. Thank you so much! Watched an interview Pálfi had at Cannes where the movie was shown. There he talks about how he made it out of necessity(due to lack of funding), instead of what I assumed was experimental storytelling out of a desire to create something different. Interesting how sometimes exploration of new ideas can come from a lack of resources pushing you to think new.
Video Essays use this technique quite a lot. And I don't just mean YouTube videos but filmmakers like Mark Rappaport have used it extensively to create a discourse on film history. Contemporary Godard has also been making interesting films using this technique. You could also check out Frank Beauvais' beautiful film "Just don't think I'll scream."
I ask this because this movie is where it became noticeable. Especially near the end where it was one of the funniest jokes in the movie.
Maybe how to train your dragon, with the "yes I can't wait I am so LEAVING"
Pick one: Cut to character they’re talking about.
Cut to montage of plan in action as they voice over with fire dialogue.
Cut to something completely different so the audience finds out later.
Lol, and swelling music
I just hate it when movies have so many cuts in between scenes mainly the action sequences. I want to be able to follow along and understand the scene more clearly instead of having shaky can or quick cuts. Anyone wanna tell me why movies do that?
There is an interview of Jacky Chan after Rush Hour who explains well the difference between action scenes in Hollywood and in Hong Kong. He says in HK, they would rehearse and do as many takes as it was needed to make the scene right wheras in Hollywood, they didn’t have time/money for that so they were using editing tricks instead
Cuts enable the editors to control the pace. Lots of quick cuts makes it feel frantic.
I understand that but like isn’t it hard to follow along the scene because of how many cuts are there in between the scene? Like some are not hard to follow but like Ik it adds more emotion to the scene and intensity but like does it really have to have quick cuts and shaky camera?
First maybe hold back a little bit on your use of the word 'like', cause it's like, really intrusive ya know? Like really.
Do you have a specific film in mind to provide an example? I honestly haven't found any action films that were difficult to follow due to how they were shot/edited.
Welcome to modern action films. It's a big reason why they don't really do much for me - once you identify the editing tricks being used, it just stops feeling exciting any more. Compare to action scenes in the 80s where the editing was less obtrusive, whilst actual stunts were being done (rather than CG) and it just feel so much more visceral and interesting to me.
But this modern style appeals to people and is cheap, so I'm afraid it's going to stay unless someone makes a huge hit using more traditional action staging.
Action scenes tend not to be about emotion (but they do have it). Short quick anything give propulsion. Short sentences give pace. Staccato notes on a guitar feel quick rather than sustain.
To make the action feel quick, fast, quick, cuts. That’s the main reason.
Because it is easier to create the illusion of violent action with short shots than will longer ones.
Blame The Bourne Identity
Also, a bit cheaper to film and choreograph when you don't need an entire sequence to execute right.
But I agree -- prefer longer takes
Simply put: It’s easier.
I'm looking for films that feature scenes where there's a sudden silence, and then one of the characters abruptly attacks someone, fires their weapon, or initiates a fight, causing chaos. Films that surprise you with these kinds of unexpected moments.
Young Guns 1 & 2
Thank you
Burn After Reading
Thank you
All of tarantino’s films have these scenes
And it’s always the best part of the movie
Goodfellas.
You mean this pen?
Thank you
examples of graphic match cuts in film
Graphic match cuts are a powerful editing technique that connects two shots through similar visual elements, creating a seamless transition. Here are some notable examples:
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho (1960)
Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014)
David Lean's Lawrence of Arabia (1962)
Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas (1990)
Takeaway: Graphic match cuts are effective for enhancing storytelling by linking thematic elements visually. They can create emotional resonance and maintain the viewer's engagement. When analyzing films, pay attention to how these cuts contribute to the narrative and visual style.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.