TL;DR
Understanding Match Cuts
A match cut is a film editing technique where two different shots are joined together by matching the composition or action, creating a seamless transition. This technique can enhance storytelling by drawing visual parallels between scenes or emphasizing thematic connections. It's distinct from other types of cuts like jump cuts or smash cuts, which serve different narrative purposes [1:1],
[3].
Iconic Examples
One of the most famous examples of a match cut is from Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey." The scene transitions from a bone thrown into the air by an ape to a spaceship orbiting Earth, symbolizing the leap in human evolution and technology [5:1]. Another iconic match cut is found in "Lawrence of Arabia," where the extinguishing of a match is seamlessly transitioned into a sunrise over the desert, reflecting both a passage of time and Lawrence's journey into the harsh environment
[4:7],
[4:11].
Artistic and Technical Challenges
Creating a successful match cut requires meticulous planning during production to ensure that the two shots align perfectly in terms of composition, movement, and lighting. This can be challenging, as it often involves shooting in different locations and under varying conditions. The match cut in "Lawrence of Arabia" was noted for its artistic innovation rather than technical difficulty, as it required audiences to make a conceptual leap between two seemingly unrelated images [4:1],
[4:2].
Symbolism and Narrative Impact
Match cuts are not only visually striking but also carry significant symbolic weight. In "Lawrence of Arabia," the transition from the match to the sunrise encapsulates Lawrence's character and foreshadows his experiences in the desert. These cuts can convey complex ideas and emotions succinctly, making them powerful tools in a filmmaker's arsenal [4:7],
[4:11].
Recommendations
For those interested in exploring more match cuts, watching films by directors known for their innovative editing techniques, such as David Lean, can provide further insight into this art form. Additionally, studying these cuts in context can deepen one's appreciation for how they contribute to the overall narrative and thematic structure of a film.
Me and my friend like to discuss movies and the movie that came up was 1917 (2019 directed by Sam Mendes). We were taking about the hidden cuts in the movie and see how many we could find. He said that he found some match cuts. I was confused at first and told him that there are none. So we went back an fourth for about 20 minutes where the match cut was and debated if it was or not. The scene for context is when Schofield is shot in the head (he survives) and the screen goes dark.
Would you count this as a match cut? If not are there any other match cuts in the movie 1917?
Now that you are learning that a match cut is something different than a cut or hidden cut, check out some David Lean films like Lawrence of Arabia for great match cut examples.
I think a match cut is more like when one frame cuts to another frame that lines up similarly to the dimensions/framing of the previous shot. 1917 is more of an example of shots that are blended together, so it looks like there's no cut at all.
Here is an article on the 34 cuts so you can try to figure out which is a match cut:
https://screenrant.com/1917-movie-secret-cuts-one-shot-trick-scenes-where/
It cuts to black rather than to a corresponding image or action so it's a standard cut, not a match cut
Would you say that some where in the film there is a match cut or no?
Others have already pointed this out, but there aren't really any match cuts in 1917. There's just the one cut to black and then a series of hidden edits to blend all of the scenes together into one (technically two) seemingly continuous long take. A match cut is specifically when a scene cuts from one shot to a different shot that matches the composition (and/or sometimes the movement or action) of the previous shot. One of the most famous examples of this is in the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey, when it cuts from the bone being thrown up in the air to the space station floating in outer space.
This is a great youtube channel that's full of practical information.
Match cuts have to be thought out in the production, Achieving seamless matches requires meticulous planning during shooting. Sound transitions also matter a lot while maintaining narrative flow. The best one is Jurassic Park match cut.
Match cutting is considered one of the most difficult video editing techniques, because finding a pair of shots that match can take days, if not weeks. Then executing it seamlessly without the audience noticing it is real skillful mastery of the craft.
A fact, Netflix has a MatchCutting tool. They are always finding collaboration opportunities and hiring great machine learning engineers for building out the tools in editing. Their trailers and Stranger things series has extensive use of this.
https://i.redd.it/srdsn6kzkldf1.gif
A promo was made using a series of action mat cuts from Extraction, Red Notice, Sandman, Glow, Arcane, Sea Beast, and Royalteen.
Yes, contrast cut seems much easier to plan, both logistically & creatively.
For more Editing Basics:
SO, let's get the definitions out of the way first, because there are some important differences between these three similar kinds of cuts from shot A to shot B.
1 The Jump Cut:
The 'Jump Cut' simply involves two visually/narratively connected shots where there is a chunk of time 'missing' between them. For example, Hereditary features the frequent use of jump cuts to transition the establishing shots of the house from day to night. Smash- and match-cuts are often specialised jump cuts, but a jump cut on its own is just a way to get us to move forward in time from one frame to the next. This does NOT include fade transitions!!
2 The Smash Cut
The 'Smash Cut' is a cut where two narratively disparate but visually similar shots are placed to juxtapose them. A good example is in Game of Thrones, where a close-up of a blade approaching festering skin cuts to a knife cutting into a crispy pie, giving a gruesome impression of what we're seeing. Smash cuts are often done for shock and amusement and are a fun way to avoid showing the full detail of the A shot once you get to B. Note that a smash cut isn't simply jumping from one frame to the next, it needs to smash two shots which aren't from the same sequence.
3 The Match Cut
This is where a visual element from shot A is replicated in some way once we cut to shot B. The classic example is the bone-to-satellite in 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is probably the most specialised of these cuts because lining up shots for a sudden cut can look a bit iffy if it's either an inexact match or the B shot doesn't feel complementary to A.
With those definitions in mind: What's your favourite example of each cut? Mine are included in the definitions.
Oh yeah the Game of Thrones one was memorable!
One of the Saw movies has many great smash cuts. I can't find an example on YouTube but I remember one guy being thrown through a window wall then the camera pans and the window is linked to an office and a guy walk through the door to give papers to someone else.
>but I remember one guy being thrown through a window wall then the camera pans and the window is linked to an office and a guy walk through the door to give papers to someone else.
Lol, Darren Lynn Bouseman's screen transitions were so jarring in Saw 4.
This is what you're looking for.
Exorcist 3
“Father Dyer’s middle name was Kevin.”
“Kevinn.”
I recently watched Lawrence of Arabia, and was surprised to see that the shot of Lawrence blowing the matchstick fire out, which transitions into the shot of the sunrise, is considered an iconic cinematic moment and a defining moment for film editing. Perhaps I’m a huge idiot, but I genuinely don’t get why this shot is special. To me, it’s just a regular (if well timed) cut between two unrelated shots. A character blows out a match, and then we get a timeskip. Why is this cut so special?
In addition to the technical side which was not easy at the time, it’s the symbolism. Lawrence has just snuffed the match with the iconic “the trick is not minding that it hurts” line. The match is out; the sun appears, and for the rest of the movie we’re going to see Lawrence demonstrate that even scaled up from a single match indoors to relentless sun in the desert, he does not mind that it hurts.
It’s great visually and symbolically and progresses the movie to greater scale.
Going to disagree on the technical side- it was not difficult to make an edit like this on film at the time. In fact it was super easy, barely an inconvenience. Hell, Murch edited The Conversation literally to the actors' eye blinks.
I’m not technical enough to defend in depth, but Lawrence was 12 years before The Conversation, and I’ve been told (perhaps incorrectly) that the blend from match/interior to sun/landscape was a challenge because it’s a cut, not a dissolve. So the two scenes lighting had to be matched on film, shot in very different locations and times. I’d welcome correction if that’s not true.
It was not technically difficult. It was artistically almost unheard of though.
Up until that Lawrence cut, filmmakers gave audiences way too little credit in making the leap from a matchstick to the sunrise in a different location.
This was so innovative, it practically became the foundation of Lawrence second unit cinematographer Nicolas Roeg’s cut-up style when he became a director.
Tons of inventive editing too including cuts during whip pans (in the 60s!) and having fake cuts by panning from that character to that character in the distance (just a different actor).
I didn't realize Roeg was the second unit cinematographer in that film. Incredible!
The Mystery of Edwin Drood, 1935, has a great scene about 10 minutes in where he is walking of of an opium den and down the sidewalk. The camera pans down to his feet, and follows for a few seconds, and then fades into his feet walking in a different scene. The camera then pans up to show him in church, dressed as a choir leader. The scene demonstrates the duality of his character in a very nice way.
Lots of reasons why it's good.
It's a kind of delayed match cut: the flame is blown out, then there's moments of suspense, then finally the sun rises.
There's also the way Lawrence seems to control the cut, which speaks to his attitude about going to the desert.
Lawrence of Arabia was shot in Superpanavision 70 in 1962. The first film shot in that format was in 1959. Scope or ultra wide formats had only really been in use since 1953, so having such a vast aspect ratio was massively impactful to audiences who were still getting used to so much screen real estate taking up their peripheral vision. It’s the era when movie-films became cinema. When you add to that the sound design, the thematic significance in the story, the masterful cinematography, then you might come to realise it’s one of those watershed moments in cinema history where the material justifies the format and made the format more than a gimmick, right up there with Dorothy leaving Kansas and stepping out into a world of colour. We take huge formats for granted now, but back then cinemas were pokey little family run joints filled with cigarette smoke, and the spectacle must’ve been revelatory.
tl;dr: it was a different time
The line is an early indication that he is not like other Englishmen, and when he refuses to drink until his guide does, he progresses along his personal journey. The quenching of the match foretells his foreshortened life, which the film has already shown, and drops us into the action of the cruel yet purifying sun.
for me it's just evocative, it says a lot purely in the language of film. the lines he speaks before blowing out the match are setting up his character, his point of view. it's also an extreme transition that immediately conveys the brutality of the sun and the qualities of the desert where the action will take place. first we see the fire of a lit match: it's hot, it hurts to touch, but Lawrence cavalierly suggests you simply accept the pain and conquer it. cut immediately to the empty desert sunrise. we still might be taking in what Lawrence just said and did, but the abruptness of the cut immediately undermines his confidence and suggests arrogance, hubris. the sun is the same thing in quality as the lit match - fire - but on a scale that is overwhelmingly massive. is this a pain Lawrence can "not mind"? we go from the controlled, rather comfortable domesticity of a British garrison, with its abundant creature comforts, to the stark, harsh reality of the desert, a place with nowhere to hide - we the audience cannot run or hide from the sun as it rises into view. we are introduced to some of the stakes involved: man vs nature, which is a classic setting for storytelling. i could go on!
Indoor scene cuts directly to a majestic and very large screen sunrise. It's one cut that explains a lot emotionally to the audience instantly
This is like debating whether the eyebrows on the Mona Lisa are slightly uneven.
"This is like debating whether the eyebrows on the Mona Lisa are slightly uneven."
Yes it's nitpicking, but still curious. This is a topic often brought up at the old IMDB forum. I just thought it might be interesting to talk about it again.
More importantly, why does the bone's rotation change?
Good question.
I think the oft-used claim this is a match cut misses the point; it's a 3 shot sequence: 1) Bone goes up, 2) Bone starts to come down and 3) Spaceship! From an editing point of view I feel the reasoning is to catch viewers' attention as the Wikipedia entry about the Rule-of-3 states: "setting up a pattern of two items and then subverting viewer expectations by breaking that pattern with the third item."
That's makes sense viewing it that way.
It isn't though.
I love it so much. but I agree that visually it felt slightly off
The original fanedtor, JD I think...hasn't been online for a couple of years and that's how long I've been trying to get in contact them to get to see this cut...it's on my bucket list of watches.
Is there someone else presiding over the files?
Thanks for the help everyone...looks like I'm putting the popcorn on later this evening 🫡
Awesome, would also love to see any extended Lethal weapon cuts
I may have it, send me a DM.
Please, please can I also DM for a link?
Sure can
>Documentary about the art of film editing. Clips are shown from many groundbreaking films with innovative editing styles.
My dumb ass was kind of hoping this would be about the movie The Cutting Edge lol. That's fine, I'll see my enemies to lovers figure skating movie loving self out :P
(no shade to the actual documentary tho)
Excellent! makes me want to be more daring with music production - creative editing can suggest so much.
The OP has provided the following Submission Statement for their post:
> Documentary about the art of film editing. Clips are shown from many groundbreaking films with innovative editing styles.
If you believe this Submission Statement is appropriate for the post, please upvote this comment; otherwise, downvote it.
Basically the title. Movies like Requiem For a Dream or Hot Fuzz that have considerable number of cuts between shots or scenes?
Armageddon or most Michael Bay movies.
Across the Spiderverse.
Same with a lot of Nolan’s movies too. Lots of cutting between 3 different things happening at the same time.
Natural Born Killers (1994)
Run Lola Run (1998)
Someone recently posted a clip elsewhere from Halle Barry's Catwoman - the basketball scene - which had an amazing, preposterous number of cuts.
First movie that came to mind. Second was Taken with Liam Neeson
Bourne trilogy
[deleted]
The trick is to make the matchstick wet at the bottom so that it goes out before it burns your fingers
“What’s the trick?”
“The trick is not minding that it hurts.”
This is either Lawrence of Arabia or All the Presidents Men. Either one, the impact is still the same.
Try it...yes it shows the person is crazy can withstand pain.
Years ago there was a great youtube video that showed shots that inspired The Master, cut with the original inspiration. I can't find it for the life of me. Anyone have any leads?
A film people don’t often talk about that clearly inspired some shots in it: Ophuls’ “Caught”
Might not be exactly what you're looking for but this video by fandor is the first thing that comes to my mind
This probably it! At least very very close.
It’s the side by side one right? With a pool sequence of two men singing Slow boat to china? Been looking for this forever and can’t find it either
I think the poster above might have gotten it! It's not exactly how I remember, there might have been another without narration ?
That scene is from Peter Greenaway 8 1/2 women
https://youtu.be/hWx1rLr9Ii8?si=SjCY4QaMVtlxaGUC
It's probably this. I made it.
I don't that is the video unless it's a re-upload. But it's very cool, nice one!
I bet its this. skip to the section about The Master, he shows scenes from a John Huston doc about WWII vets side by side with scenes of the movie
famous match cuts in movie history
Key Considerations for Famous Match Cuts:
Definition: A match cut is a transition between two scenes that visually or thematically connects them, often using similar shapes, colors, or actions.
Impact on Storytelling: Match cuts can enhance narrative flow, create visual metaphors, and evoke emotional responses from the audience.
Cinematic Techniques: Pay attention to how filmmakers use match cuts to juxtapose different ideas or time periods, often leading to deeper interpretations.
Notable Examples:
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) - The iconic cut from a bone thrown by a prehistoric ape to a space station is a powerful visual metaphor for evolution and the passage of time.
The Graduate (1967) - The cut from Benjamin's face to a close-up of a woman's leg in a swimming pool effectively conveys his feelings of disconnection and desire.
Birdman (2014) - The seamless transitions between scenes often utilize match cuts to create a continuous flow, enhancing the film's unique narrative style.
The Godfather (1972) - The cut from the baptism scene to the violent killings orchestrated by Michael Corleone juxtaposes innocence with brutality, highlighting the duality of his character.
Takeaway: Match cuts are a powerful storytelling tool in cinema that can create memorable moments and deepen the audience's understanding of themes and characters. When watching films, pay attention to these transitions to appreciate the artistry behind them.
Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.