Add to Chrome

Log In

Sign Up

Try Gigabrain PRO

Supercharge your access to the collective wisdom of reddit, youtube, and more.
Learn More
Refine result by
Most Relevant
Most Recent
Most Upvotes
Filter by subreddit
r/PowerScalingHub
r/Endgame
r/ironman
r/Marvel
r/Avengers
r/powerscales
r/FanTheories

What Happens to Iron Man After Endgame?

GigaBrain scanned 207 comments to find you 95 relevant comments from 10 relevant discussions.
Sort
Filter

Sources

MCU Iron man is transported 10 years before the Fall of Reach! Can he prevent the fall?
r/PowerScalingHub • 1
[SPOILER] About that ending...
r/Endgame • 2
Is Iron Man really dead? Will he come back?
r/Endgame • 3
View All
7 more

TLDR

Summary

New

Chat with GigaBrain

What Redditors are Saying

What Happens to Iron Man After "Endgame"?

TL;DR Iron Man, portrayed by Tony Stark, dies in "Avengers: Endgame" after using the Infinity Stones to defeat Thanos. While his death is a significant moment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), discussions continue about potential ways he could return or be reimagined in future storylines.

Tony Stark's Death and Legacy

In "Avengers: Endgame," Tony Stark sacrifices himself to save the universe by using the Infinity Stones to defeat Thanos. This act of heroism marks the end of his journey as Iron Man, highlighting his character development from a self-centered billionaire to a selfless hero [2:1]. Despite his death, there are ongoing discussions among fans about the possibility of his return, either through alternate realities or time travel [3:4].

Potential Returns and Alternate Universes

Some fans speculate that Iron Man could return through the use of alternate universes or time travel, as seen with other characters in the MCU [3:6]. However, this raises ethical questions about removing Tony from another reality where he may still be needed [3:3]. The concept of multiverses and time travel in the MCU allows for creative possibilities, but it also complicates the narrative [3:2].

Comic Book Inspirations and Future Storylines

In the comics, Iron Man has been resurrected multiple times, which fuels speculation about his potential return in the MCU [3:1]. Some fans suggest exploring storylines where Tony Stark continues his technological advancements, possibly expanding into space and encountering characters like the Guardians of the Galaxy [4]. These ideas align with the notion of an "Immortal Iron Man," where Tony's legacy and influence persist beyond his physical presence.

Iron Man's Role in the Avengers and Solo Ventures

There is debate about Iron Man's role within the Avengers team and whether he should take a break from team dynamics to focus on solo ventures [5:1]. Some fans argue that Iron Man needs a "back to basics" run, focusing on his personal journey, supporting cast, and villains without the influence of larger Marvel Universe events [5:5]. Others believe that removing him from the Avengers would limit his exposure to new fans and diminish his impact [5:2].

Overall, while Tony Stark's journey as Iron Man concluded in "Endgame," his legacy continues to inspire discussions about his potential return and the future direction of his character in the MCU.

See less

Helpful

Not helpful

You have reached the maximum number of searches allowed today.

Cut through the noise directly on Google.

The GigaBrain browser extension dives deep into billions of discussions, bringing you the most relevant and informative answers on the spot.

Add to Chrome

Source Threads

POST SUMMARY • [1]

Summarize

MCU Iron man is transported 10 years before the Fall of Reach! Can he prevent the fall?

Posted by Archenius · in r/PowerScalingHub · 1 month ago
53 upvotes on reddit
12 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
ORIGINAL POST
post image

Scenario: Tony stark is given 10 years to prepare the entire planet before the fall of the planet Reach, He knows he's stuck in the Halo verse and is willing to share all of his knowledge and technology.

12 replies
chris0castro · 1 month ago

Ten years is a long time to mass produce tech that Tony has created and integrate it with both Spartans and marines. Tony saves humanity and puts doctor Halsey out of business

25 upvotes on reddit
2
27Rench27 · 1 month ago

Spartans with Iron Man tech plus Mjolnir would be fucking terrifying

10 upvotes on reddit
Gravemind7 · 1 month ago
  1. I’d read this fanfiction in a heartbeat.

2.Yes, and yes. The only intelligence on the level of Tony is probably a Key Mind, the Librarian, and the precursors. Given Tony’s will to not see a bunch of humans be slaughtered by aliens for religious reasons? Reach wouldn’t even come close to ever happening. By the 6 year mark Humanity would likely be winning the war. Tony invented time travel and nanotechnology with 2010s Earth tech. Halo is 500 years more advanced than that. 10 years into this universe he’s going to have ships that make the Infinity look like a tug boat and if you thought Spartans were terrifying before? Tony might actually make Master Chief straight up unkillable.

3 upvotes on reddit
ofcourseitsroger · 1 month ago

They are going to glass the planet.

Frankly he accelerates the fall. Noble 6 dropped hella Covenant. Ironman makes the Covenant go nuclear immediately.

4 upvotes on reddit
periodicchemistrypun · 1 month ago

I don’t know if Ironman as just a fighter is making much of difference.

I couldn’t justify seeing him as a better fighter than a spartan, they get their mileage just as much for being brillant soldiers as they do for their enhancements.

The covenant would treat him as an aircraft and laser weapons would make life hard for him.

4 upvotes on reddit
Archenius · OP · 1 month ago

In this scenario iron man is willing to share his tech and knowledge which is a great boon to the UNSC as his Ironman suit is centuries ahead when compared to spartan armor

2 upvotes on reddit
ofcourseitsroger · 1 month ago

Idk in the suit walked off a moon being thrown at him but he is also Tony Stark and making weapons is his thing.

He's closer to an Aircraft Carrier than an Aircraft in this fight. You gotta go big or he will mess you up. They glassed Reach to deal with regular military and a team of Super Soldiers caused them all sorts of grief.

2 upvotes on reddit
Efficient-Ease-6938 · 1 month ago

Well Reach fell because the Covenant came out of no where and hit them hard. By the time Halo is happening Tony's suit isn't really that far ahead. Now it has been awhile since I read the book and played the game (Reach specifically). I personally don't think it would grant them an automatic win, but that would have a way better chance if they knew about it ahead of time.

4 upvotes on reddit
Endlessmarcher · 1 month ago

From an enhancing the soldiers stand point I’ll grant you sure. But from a weapons platform point? The iron man suits mixed with spartan armor tech would be insane. Half the time Spartans are walking armies with a meh arsenal. Now they have both. 

I think 10 years is plenty of time and as a result tony flips the battle on reach and by extension the entire war once he gets a chance to reverse engineer their stuff.

This isn’t even counting like endgame iron man where his weapons are hard light and or nanites. 

2 upvotes on reddit
ofcourseitsroger · 1 month ago

They eventually glass the planet in the story.

I think if there was a genuine threat to the entire operation running around they would escalate immediately.

2 upvotes on reddit
NotJatne · 1 month ago

My guess is they'd be monitoring what's happening on the planet at some distance and if they see the planet being fortified, they'll just destroy it and anyone on it that could become a threat

3 upvotes on reddit
Potasty · 1 month ago

Using the pic provided im assuming you mean Infinity War/Endgame Tony Stark and if thats the case I’d say almost definitely. His tech is already insane atp, AND he gets a whole decade to prepare and produce whatever he wants with the most industrially capable planet humanity has to offer.

Tony would have also more successfully reverse engineered covie tech, and honestly probably would have improved upon it. So in 10 years time he would have closed and maybe even reversed the technology gap between the covenant and the unsc, taking away one of the covenant’s biggest advantages. The only question is if that is enough to close the other advantage, and thats the sheer size of the covenant’s navy. But with prep time, I think the unsc could match the numbers of the Fleet of Particular Justice.

All in all, I’d say 8/10 chance he prevents the fall.

4 upvotes on reddit
See 12 replies
r/Endgame • [2]

Summarize

[SPOILER] About that ending...

Posted by laserman500 · in r/Endgame · 6 years ago

Is anyone a little dissatisfied with them killing Tony? I get why they did it. But he is main character of the mcu. It just feels off having him set-up to retire and become a father only for him to die. Hopefully he comes back in some other way.

1 upvotes on reddit
3 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
3 replies
S
scuderia91 · 6 years ago

It’s the only way it could ever end. For Tony being iron man was like an addiction. He had the happy ending and yet he just couldn’t help but solve to time travel issue and jeopardise that to save the universe. If he’d walked away from the final battle he’d have only retired until the next thing came along. It’s been a plot point for Tony a number of times that he sort of retires and you find really he’s still been developing new suits or tech.

2 upvotes on reddit
laserman500 · OP · 6 years ago

I meant that he survives his snap and truly gives up being iron man to be a father

1 upvotes on reddit
[deleted] · 6 years ago

Hasn’t he been killed a few times just to come back, really hope he returns

0 upvotes on reddit
See 3 replies
r/Endgame • [3]

Summarize

Is Iron Man really dead? Will he come back?

Posted by [deleted] · in r/Endgame · 6 years ago

I was wondering if anyone had any theories about whether iron man will truly stay dead or he will come back or he was never dead at all. I have a few but I was wondering about yours.

3 upvotes on reddit
12 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
12 replies
lioneye9 · 6 years ago

I don’t see why the can’t go back in time and bring him to the future, They seem to be able to alter the past paradox free

2 upvotes on reddit
C
confusedporg · 6 years ago

The question wouldn’t be can they, it would be should they?

In any reality similar to theirs where he exists, he needs to be there to save that Universe from Thanos. Removing him would doom that reality.

In the one reality (that we know of—the reality that the new Thanos of Endgame jumped over from then got dusted) where that isn’t necessary, you’d still be taking Tony away from everyone who knows him and cares about him there.

2 upvotes on reddit
lioneye9 · 6 years ago

Then go back in the current reality and pick him up? Time travel is a mind fuck, but they seemed to be able to change their current reality’s past without it altering the future. Many examples of this, including Thanos traveling in the future w/ gamora. This should have altered the current timeline

0 upvotes on reddit
C
CrimsonAvenger35 · 6 years ago

Imagine it from the perspective of the alternate universe you're stealing him from.

You're the Avengers. Suddenly a bunch of alternate versions of yourselves appear out of nowhere and kidnap Iron Man. Are you just going to let that slide?

Even if they tried to explain that he was going to die anyway, none of the Avengers are the types to accept either option. That means they'll fight. Not to mention that taking him from them, might just doom them outright, so there's no way Iron Man would go along with that.

1 upvotes on reddit
lioneye9 · 6 years ago

Sounds like the plot of a next movie, Avengers vs Avengers, battle for Iron Man

2 upvotes on reddit
[deleted] · 6 years ago

Yes, however, their time machu ine was destroyed and they might not be able to reconstruct it with out stark?

1 upvotes on reddit
C
confusedporg · 6 years ago

They came up with some kind of mini platform for the final scene with Cap. And Pym knows how to make a quantum tunnel, so as long as they still have Starks “GPS” tech, they’re probably fine.

3 upvotes on reddit
lioneye9 · 6 years ago

Nah I don’t buy that, they sent captain back so he could do whatever and live a different life and return the stones

2 upvotes on reddit
Bueno117 · 6 years ago

I know the movie has been out for a while but it might be a good idea to delete this post because of the spoiler in the title :/

Try reposting saying you have a question then state the question in the description

3 upvotes on reddit
[deleted] · 6 years ago

Thank you however the spoiler ban has been relieved as all proper marvel fans would have seen to by now easily.

-3 upvotes on reddit
Bueno117 · 6 years ago

I’ve got friends who have unfortunately been backed up by finals and other pressing matters. They didn’t want to pirate the film out of convenience for the sake of seeing it in theaters.

That doesn’t make them any less of fans. In fact they’re more proper fans because they want to support the film and take in the experience.

I’m sure others are in the same situation (but should probably be off this subreddit in the first place. So there’s that)

Just asking this out of courtesy’s sake

4 upvotes on reddit
CollectableRat · 6 years ago

I can tell you that he comes back because he is in other marvel comic archs that Disney plan on filming, including one where his wife dies for real, one where he is ostracised for accidentally killing a child in a fight with captain marvel (but the twist at the end of that comic series is it that Hydra was behind it all), plus he’s very involved with the return of Hydra and the mega twist at the end of the entire arch is that Tony Stark’s father was a founding member of Hydra and Pepper was being blackmailed into leaking info on the Avengers all along, that twist ending is sure to be a tear jerker, probably will make more waves than Endgame. The thing about marvel is that all the comics have already been written, so we already know all the twists before an arch starts filming.

1 upvotes on reddit
See 12 replies
r/ironman • [4]

Summarize

What If? "Immortal Iron Man"?

Posted by Alone-Introduction83 · in r/ironman · 1 month ago

Just a random thought after seeing this short that what if Al Ewing picks up Iron Man after Iron & Frost?
Gives Tony his very own Immortal run, where Tony resumes tech progress again and slowly going beyond Earth level that he would turn to expand into space.

Quoting Reed from Avengers (2013) #43:
"He's a future man trapped in the now. A prisoner raging against the slow crawl of human evolution"

Tony goes on an adventure into space to broaden his horizon on well tech and there he encounters ofc GotG but this time just some short reunion etc, encounters with Kree, Shiar, Intergallatic Wakanda and Phalanx or other advance civilization in the universe.

We can also have a chance to see the OG Godkiller armor meant to fight celestials back again and maybe this time gets to do just that and also follow up on the mandarin rings scattered in space.

Immortal Hulk ending had the TOBA door supposed closed to Hulk and in Immortal Thor, we see him going back to being Donald Blake again from what I remember some peeps saying.
And for Tony Immortal run would be his name much more well know throughout the universe and kind of immortalized as one of the greatest builders in the universe kinda ending.

What do you guys think?

youtube.com
11 upvotes on reddit
11 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
11 replies
S
spider-venomized · 1 month ago

There kind of a bit context to understand why some might be hesitant

Al Ewing kind doesnt get Iron man

He said in his interview that he does not see Tony as a good person more villain on the right side and will do anything for the precived "greater good" like a diet Dr. Doom. To him the more interesting part of Iron man is the self destructive aspect of him. So if he would write Iron man it will most likey be another Cantwell where tony is given shit for all his past mistakes and punch down

As for the sapce aspect mention that would sound cool tho always love how they did it with Venom the end where in the far future the AI empire at war were the Phalanx and the Iron men AI

https://preview.redd.it/j7ldar17ushf1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24c0810a3b34d9634ffe64d8297dc0c624f98877

14 upvotes on reddit
K
KEROGAAA · 1 month ago

"Does not see Tony as a good person more villain on the right side and will do anything for the perceived "greater good" like a diet Dr. Doom..."

Da fuq? Lol.

3 upvotes on reddit
S
spider-venomized · 1 month ago

https://preview.redd.it/14c59zs6nthf1.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff7ac418d0275e25158c9f529fedb84b862add70

3 upvotes on reddit
M
MiamisLastCapitalist · 1 month ago

I LOVED that ASI Tony. I think Adam Warren could pull off an Immortal Iron Man for sure

4 upvotes on reddit
Alone-Introduction83 · OP · 1 month ago

Same, really liked ASI Tony which is also weird how it was supposed to be Venom the End it was also v2 for Iron Man the End too.

3 upvotes on reddit
Alone-Introduction83 · OP · 1 month ago

While yeah Al did share his take on Tony is more of a Doom altho idk if it will go like how Cantwell's version of doormat apologetic Tony but defo see him raise the consequences of Tony's action farther than what Tony did as Iron God like start building secret weapons hidden away like a new legion of Argonauts or a secret armada prepared to wage war where we see Tony literally taking the defense of earth in his own hands rather than with literally everyone.

Heck can even see him have the Stark Sentinel Buster still around and his own version of mass produced Stark Sentinels for mutants just in case because you can never be too sure around these stu-mutants. All for another spark that will make mutants hate Tony.

Classic hate plot for Tont lmao. But imho just jealous of how Hulk and Thor got lore/character progression unlike Tony who these past years are just riches reboot, being apologethic and the icon of asshole despite literally doing and being heroic as fxk.

They really need to stop writing Tony as the typical irl billionaire, like look at Bruce a rich guy but aint gettin flak for being capitalist n sht while Tont is treated like Elon Musk or other perceived trashionnaire irl by peeps.

2 upvotes on reddit
One_Butterscotch8981 · 1 month ago

To get Tony his progression you need Hickman or Ayodele or even someone like Gillen

3 upvotes on reddit
PrestigiousBee5602 · 1 month ago

I think building on the concept introduced in I am Iron Man #5 could be a great way to do an Immortal Iron Man as well

3 upvotes on reddit
Alone-Introduction83 · OP · 1 month ago

True but instead of going Iron Man Hunger Games is that they are united and ofc will not go full Ultron n sht otherwise this will be literally Ultron 2.0 and will add more fuel for Tony's hater to hate on him more.

Also they can follow Slott's AI Tony characterization, kinda like how AI Tony sacrificed himself without hesitation to save people in Slott's run of Iron Man altho kinda disappointing how it happened which is just some EMP but damn AI Tony was an absolute bro to Tony.
Kinda miss Anthony from Ultimate Tony now smh.

1 upvotes on reddit
SageShinigami · 1 month ago

ITT I learned I do not want one of my favorite writers going anywhere near Iron Man. Dang.

2 upvotes on reddit
B
BatmanFan317 · 1 month ago

Yeah, I had suspicions based on the sheer lack of Tony from most of his writing (since he clearly likes to bring in other characters in his stories) and stuff like his Immortal Hulk characterisation, but sad to see it confirmed.

1 upvotes on reddit
See 11 replies
r/ironman • [5]

Summarize

Hot take: The next Avengers run should not have Iron Man on it

Posted by Juliiju04 · in r/ironman · 8 days ago
post image

Some are speculating that Mackay's time on the Avengers might end after Avengers #800 on January, or if that's not the case that a status quo change for the team is incoming with that numbering, and a new lineup wouldn't be surprising. Now, here's the thing, I love Iron Man on the Avengers, but they could take a time off each other for different reasons.
Iron Man needs time off, because he needs a good solo run. Often, it feels that Iron Man writers are too dependant on the general Marvel Universe, and I get it, he is a character who influences and impacts on the larger world he inhabits, but writers need to develop his own cast of characters more. Cantwell, Duggan and Ackerman centered much more on a "Marvel Universe Iron Man" than one with his own cast. Sure, he can be friends with other Marvel Universe heroes, and have cool battles with other Marvel Universe villains, but he needs to have close relationships with his own cast, and have personal rivalry with his own villains.
Because of that, I think that a run where Iron Man decides to take time off the Avengers to center more on developing Stark Unlimited as a force of good and humanitarian help would be interesting to see in scale and development.

On the other hand, Iron Man has been on most Avengers rosters since... the Busiek Avengers run, really. Few times he wasn't was because he was either dead or brain damaged, but other than that, he's been on the team for a while. And here's the thing about the Avengers: For a long period of their history, they were basically the team where the heroes who didn't have their own title got to shine, that's why Iron Man came and went from the team, he didn't need it to develop as a character, he had his own book. Now, the concept of the team has changed sinice then, MCU and all, but it'd still be nice to allow the heroes who don't always get their chance on the spotlight to get it.

But, if you don't want to miss having an armored character on the team, I got the solution for you: Just make Rhodey an Avenger again for goods sake! And give him something to do this time! (I'm looking at you, West Coast Avengers 2024). Seriously, it's an easy awnser to the problem: You get Tony doing solo stuff with his own supporting cast and villains, while Rhodey gets on with the Avengers and we see other sides of him. It's a win-win!

So, since Iron and Frost ends on December, and Mackay's Avengers might do the same on January, let's see if this is gonna be true!

84 upvotes on reddit
12 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
12 replies
CajunKhan · 8 days ago

Removing him from the Avengers has zero effect on his solo series. Plenty of characters have had classic solo runs while being on teams. Soloes and teams just ignore each other anyway. No one creating these things care if the solo and team continuity contradict each other.

So all removing him from teams will do is eliminate chances for Iron Man to make more fans out of people who picked up the team book.

12 upvotes on reddit
Traditional-Fig-6661 · 8 days ago

It's better than using him like some side character that is only there for other characters glow up

3 upvotes on reddit
S
spider-venomized · 8 days ago

idk im of two minds

yes the new Iron man solo series must center more on developing Stark Unlimited and his supporting cast and villains that not controversial to say

but honestly i don't think they will cut him out of the avengers just cause they positioned him as a member of the avengers the one who "a core member" in the sense being irreplaceable and it not iron man comic that hold this belief that just marvel book in general even All New and All Different didn't want to remove him from the book when they sort of did in the wake of CW2 the book kind felt awkward about it even when they had Spider-man be head of the team

https://preview.redd.it/im3r5sl8gfqf1.png?width=758&format=png&auto=webp&s=b41eb4bb623f060cb1d5c0bf249d522b51709110

nor do I really think that it would affect the solo series unless there a massive status quo ala Mortal Thor.

10 upvotes on reddit
GreenWind31 · 8 days ago

I completely agree. It's eroding the character's image. Other characters can take advantage of the space to improve their performance and build a better path, I think Hank Pym would be a great option.

AND BOURGEOIS NEEDS A HOLIDAY TOO!!! Even more so the fictional ones.

Do you think it's easy to be the great manipulator of Global Events in the Marvel Universe while planning to replace humans with machines and sacrifice children to the great God of Capitalism? /irony

7 upvotes on reddit
rocketinspace · 8 days ago

Iron Man needs a true back to basics run

no crossovers, no avengers, just his supporting cast and villains

44 upvotes on reddit
Kriositeetti · 8 days ago

Yeah, cut him out for a change.

But they should also re-shuffle whole roster.

41 upvotes on reddit
Linnus42 · 8 days ago

Problem is you don’t really have good options for the Classic Big Names if you take out Iron Man.

Hank & Janet lack starpower. Hulk and Thor are telling stories in their solos right now where it makes zero sense for them to be Avengers. You can bring back Steve but Steve & Sam are highly redundant.

You remove too many marquee names and it doesn’t feel like the Avengers no more. Granted I am not opposed to bringing in Rhodey. He and Carol are still dating so put them on the same team.

13 upvotes on reddit
Kriositeetti · 8 days ago

Replace Iron Man with Spider-Man (Parker).

2 upvotes on reddit
CountOrloksCastle · 6 days ago

Please god nuke Rhodey Carol from orbit

1 upvotes on reddit
Juliiju04 · OP · 8 days ago

Yeah it's true but that's why I'd like to see two rosters, one more akin to the current team led by Carol, with Rhodey on and Steve back, and other led by Sam that goes more for a "New Avengers vibe" (Since I don't really like the current New Avengers book).

3 upvotes on reddit
Juliiju04 · OP · 8 days ago

Idk, I feel that Cantwell tried to use the hook of a "back to basics" to tell a story that did everything but that. Part of it was intentional, taking a Tony who tried to stay out of his company to ground himself and ended up with the power of a god.
Plus, it's not really a "Iron Man goes back to his classic setting", since that would mean him being a CEO, fighting his villains and having his classic supporting cast. Instead, he just lives with what personal fortune he has, fights other villains like Korvac while his own rogues gallery are left on a back seat and unexplored, and his "closest friends" are now people like Hellcat, Frog-Man or Scarlet Spider, whom he had barely interacted before. In my mind, that's not a back to basics at all.
Something like Busiek, on the other hand, is.

1 upvotes on reddit
rocketinspace · 8 days ago

We really haven't though

Cantwell was some cosmic schlop, duggan was an event tie-in, Ackerman seemed to be back to basics but got eaten by the Doom event

Iron Man needs a pause from the rest of the Marvel universe

13 upvotes on reddit
See 12 replies
r/Marvel • [6]

Summarize

What REALLY happened to iron man in that final fateful scene in "Endgame" ? Something I JUST noticed while re-'watching.......

Posted by stevered1985 · in r/Marvel · 5 years ago

Posibble Spoiler if you havent seen Endgame - although I will not reveal any detailed description of the plot. I have read the rules but not sure if I am posting the "spoiler"tag in the text correctly.. if not if someone can correct me I'll be happy to edit this

SO this may be nothing.....or it may be something....but I just never noticed it before rewatching Endgame last night.

[](#s "After Tony delivers his epic final line "I Am iron man" and uses the "items"(spoiler proofing) that have been customized/attached to his glove/suit......there is a quick split for a moment when he is not in sight......moments later he stumbles over to a spot amongst the rubble/wreckage/whatever and sits down in a resting position.....

Now last night I noticed while watching that there is a split second before pepper and Peter come over that the camera from above looks down on Tony at an angle that is just right...that you can see Tony's arm turned over and the "items" that should be clearly visable and glowing around his hand appear to be gone! I've freeze framed and watched it over and over to verify it even copied and pasted the still image onto my laptop next to an image of that final version of the suit just to make sure I was seeing it right. After hours of torturing myself I have come to the following conclusion : either -

  1. This was a mistake in film editing. They forgot to add in the effects or forgot to add the items into the special effects on top of the suit that presumably did not contain the items pre- post production.

  2. This was done on purpose or they werent there because of a specific reason.

I am mainly curious to see if anyone else also sees what I am seeing here and if so: i would like to discuss possible scenarios in which they would have vanished (although aparently only temporarily as cap has them a few minutes later in film) directly after Tony used them.")

I looked around a bit and didnt seem to see anyone else pointing this out so again ....this could be nothing but I felt it was worth saying something given the outrageous implications if this was indeed a deliberate visual effect in that scene.

010 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
10 replies
theWMWotMW · 5 years ago

Seems like an editing fluke. What I thought was peculiar though was that when Thanos snapped he was taken for a moment into a vision where he spoke with Gamora as a child. Why didn’t we have a similar scene when Hulk and Tony each snapped? I could see Hulk seeing Black Widow in his vision, and Tony speaking again with his father.

1 upvotes on reddit
stevered1985 · OP · 5 years ago

Exactly ! So we should assume after Tony's snap the same would have happened as well....

1 upvotes on reddit
The_Broomflinger · 5 years ago

Actually they shot a scene of Tony after the snap seeing a vision of Morgan all grown up, telling him he did the right thing. It was deleted because apparently it was confusing and didn't contribute to the flow of the movie.

3 upvotes on reddit
N
Nejfelt · 5 years ago

The Stones just did a "snap," so they were used up and not glowing at that moment.

2 upvotes on reddit
stevered1985 · OP · 5 years ago

Its possible....if u pause it though it doesnt even look like they are there.....also...after thanos original snap the stones still appeared to glow and were visable....

0 upvotes on reddit
AdamScoot · 5 years ago

The shot is very darkly lit and Tony's arm is burnt to a crisp, the stones included, so it'll be hard to see anything. Also, the movie is a year old and the highest grossing movie of all time, everyone on this sub has seen it

1 upvotes on reddit
StarkeyTone · 5 years ago

You mean the items.

1 upvotes on reddit
Wade134 · 5 years ago

I love that people love these movies as much if not more than I do. I think it’s great that people are dedicated enough to take the time to analysing details like this. However, as Steve returns all the items, it’s fair to say this is an editing mistake and not anything more significant

3 upvotes on reddit
johnnyss1 · 5 years ago

Was also shot with half his face torn off. Left on floor though. Shame

1 upvotes on reddit
Nerwrax15 · 5 years ago

Its nothing.

1 upvotes on reddit
See 10 replies
r/Avengers • [7]

Summarize

Was the ending they gave Iron Man in Avengers: Endgame good?

Posted by South-Pay-1697 · in r/Avengers · 5 months ago
post image
i.redd.it
114 upvotes on reddit
12 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
12 replies
Agent1stClass · 5 months ago

Yes.

From the first Iron Man movie we saw the character of Tony Stark grow from a contrite businessman to a revolutionary superhero to a team leader… family man… and finally to the salvation of the universe. There was nowhere else for his character to go, except into the sunset.

His character had a well-defined journey with a reasonable and satisfying ending.

It also tied up the little time travel problem. Yes, time travel was possible… But it required two forms of technology with creators unknown to each other AND both unable to communicate. Hank Pym was dusted… and when he returned, Tony Stark died.

While Smart Hulk was able to use the tech to a small degree, the movie twice demonstrated how he doesn’t really have a handle on it. He nearly lost Scott Lang and he completely lost Steve Rogers (although Rogers wanted to be lost).

Problem solved. Time travel is now largely inaccessible to the heroes of Marvel.

The ending of Iron Man was outstanding in execution.

6 upvotes on reddit
P
PCN24454 · 5 months ago

And his reward is dying.

0 upvotes on reddit
Agent1stClass · 5 months ago

His reward was his wife, his daughter, the rescue of the half of the universe cheated of their lives, AND the ending of the threat which had haunted him since the Battle of New York.

The cost was his life.

5 upvotes on reddit
Overall-Ad-8918 · 5 months ago

Not good, perfect

35 upvotes on reddit
P
PCN24454 · 5 months ago

He’s dead.

2 upvotes on reddit
Independent-Spread35 · 5 months ago

Perfectly dead

7 upvotes on reddit
bsammo · 5 months ago

Jim.

3 upvotes on reddit
No_Internet908 · 5 months ago

Would’ve been better if he died just by choking on a piece of shawarma. Would’ve really tied the whole story together

20 upvotes on reddit
C
Carthonn · 5 months ago

He basically go cooked by the snap sort of like shawarma

3 upvotes on reddit
Mr_Blyat_ · 5 months ago

Is pizza good?

13 upvotes on reddit
V
vinny424 · 5 months ago

Seriously??

40 upvotes on reddit
Unitedfateful · 5 months ago

This might be one of the most brain dead subs honestly

It’s not Snydercult bad but fuck me some of these takes are so bad

Is this bots? Are the posters teenagers?

“Is infinity war good?” “Was the original iron man a good movie?” “What’s your honest opinion on winter soldier”

🤦‍♂️

8 upvotes on reddit
See 12 replies
r/powerscales • [8]

Summarize

MCU Iron man is transported 10 years before the Fall of Reach! Can he prevent the fall?

Posted by Archenius · in r/powerscales · 1 month ago
post image

[removed]

37 upvotes on reddit
9 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
9 replies
S
Superman246o1 · 1 month ago

If the Covies think Master Chief is a demon, they'd believe that Iron Man was Satan himself.

10 years of prep time gives Tony an insane amount of wiggle room. As the Fleet of Particular Justice arrived to assault Reach, they'd find themselves engaged by tens of thousands of Iron Legion Drones which Tony would personally lead in the Godkiller MK II armor. Noble Team would sipping on mojitos in New Alexandria while Iron Man one-shotted Covenant supercarriers with ease. Tony would hijack the Covenant's communications network to blare Black Sabbath (RIP, Ozzy) and get in some quips about how non-threatening the Covenant was to someone who had fought Dark Celestials and Thanos of Titan. Supreme Commander Thel 'Vadamee would be wondering "What is a Dark Celestial?" as his flagship exploded following a repulsor burst from the Godkiller MK II.

26 upvotes on reddit
Skychu768 · 1 month ago

As long as he has enough resources to actually build, MCU Ironman would be plenty.

An army of Mark-85 armor is enough or he can probably develop virus and AI and do it easily too even without armor.

With 10 years, possibilities are endless. Tony only worked 5-6 years in MCU and built so much from scratch. Another 10 years of upgrading from that and he might as well can become an omnipotent deity with such an exponential growth

2 upvotes on reddit
Solid-Move-1411 · 1 month ago

Regardless I think Mark-50 or higher level would be enough. Why would he even need multiversal armor

2 upvotes on reddit
Great-Possession-654 · 1 month ago

Those victories were extremely rare they also came at extreme cost for the UNSC. For every victory humanity had 10 defeats. The UNSC only did slightly better on the ground than they did space but it didn’t matter because the covenant would always gain space superiority and glass the world once they recovered the relic they were after.

The only times the UNSC won is when they heavily outnumbered the covenant which was rare due to how many ships they lost early on.

It doesn’t matter how strong of a suit Tony makes when he has billions of aliens bearing down on him he is going to be overwhelmed

Also Stark industries doesn’t exist in halo. He’d need to lay the foundations down and make a name for himself all on his own before the UNSC would take him seriously which he doesn’t have the experience in since he had inherited his company from his father. So yes he would need to start from scratch because he if tried to rely on the UNSC than ONI would simply take his tech and suit from him before killing him.

Reach is just impossible for Tony alone to save especially for 10 years. If he was given 50 years? He has a great shot at it but 10 isn’t enough time for him to set up the industry he needs and build the forces he’d need to make a difference since the UNSC was already crumbling and it was just a matter of when rather than if the covenant would win.

2 upvotes on reddit
thelordyface · 1 month ago

As Tony would likely say, its a scaling issue. I feel like Tony wouldn't get lost in the weeds in prepping for a ground game - too much ground - and instead focus on knocking out ships before they get a chance to launch invading ground forces. If he knows about covenant tech, their strengths and weaknesses, he'd likely figure a way to exploit it on a larger scale.

I mean, hell, what would an injected Stark AI do to the flag ship?

9 upvotes on reddit
Skychu768 · 1 month ago

Unrelated while he loves alcohol, he hates drugs and weed

2 upvotes on reddit
Equivalent_Cicada153 · 1 month ago

Dude built a suit capable of taking tank rounds, with micro missiles capable of blowing up said tanks, in a matter of months. Give him a single year and he would be replacing the spartan program entirely. By five years he would likely reinvent his nano machine armor on a large scale. By ten he’s gonna single handedly save reach from the covenant invasion.

3 upvotes on reddit
Solid-Move-1411 · 1 month ago

It's 10 years prep time. You can only imagine the possibility. His entire MCU time in operation was like 5-6 years just

Regardless I think Mark-50 or higher level would be enough. Why would he even need multiversal armor

2 upvotes on reddit
T
TheHunterZolomon · 1 month ago

So with 10 years and pretty much all of the unsc resources at his disposal? He would make every spartan better (swap nuclear core with a repulsor core, add nanite armor) and would probably have a disgusting orbital defense system in place. Would probably need to use Cortana or a similar AI as a basis considering ultron didn’t work out, so that would be the hiccup. Assuming he doesn’t also build a juiced ultron, the covenant would be afraid to go beyond their photospheres lol

5 upvotes on reddit
See 9 replies
r/Marvel • [9]

Summarize

Does anyone know whatever happened to the kid at the end of Iron Man three what became of him later on?

Posted by ChubbyDragon81 · in r/Marvel · 3 years ago
4 upvotes on reddit
5 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
5 replies
D
DarlingIAmTheFilth · 3 years ago

He was at Tony's funeral in Avengers Endgame. As for the 10 years between the two events? No clue. I presume he went to college, got an engineering degree and possibly worked at Stark Industries.

But that's all guesswork.

14 upvotes on reddit
ChubbyDragon81 · OP · 3 years ago

Thank you anyway. I keep about the funeral. It really the intervening years I was curious about. Or if anyone knows if he becomes an active player in the MCU at large later

4 upvotes on reddit
DunceAndFutureKing · 3 years ago

He can be seen at the funeral in endgame

4 upvotes on reddit
C
Chaloi · 3 years ago

He’s the kid in the funeral scene at the end of endgame. That’s as far as we know though.

5 upvotes on reddit
SerBrendanhouseSaint · 3 years ago

He was the lone teenage boy in Tony’s funeral scene.

4 upvotes on reddit
See 5 replies
r/FanTheories • [10]

Summarize

Avengers Endgame: OUR Iron Man is Still Alive, Possibly

Posted by only_fishcube · in r/FanTheories · 4 years ago

This may be too far-fetched but I believe there is a possibility that the Iron Man we have grown to love since 2008 is still alive.

In Avengers Endgame, it is established that within the rules of the MCU universe, time travel does not affect the course of events in the main timeline but rather creates branch timelines off of the main continuity.

Therefore, one can deduce that all the "time shenanigans" of the Avengers as they collected the stones in the past took place in the branching timelines as the moment the Avengers appeared in the past, the timelines were altered as they were not previously present at that moment in time, thereby immediately creating a branching timeline.

Based on what we know about time travel, Scott Lang's arrival in 2023, which was as a result of time travel itself, could have possibly created a branch timeline off of "our" original timeline that we have been watching all these years. Meaning everything that is happening in Avengers Endgame, after Scott Lang exits the Quantum Realm is no longer occurring in "our" MCU timeline, but rather a branch reality.

As Scott may have never reappeared in the original timeline, the events of Endgame would never have occurred. Meaning no Blip, and Iron Man, Black Widow and Captain America all live.

One could argue that in the original timeline, another Scott Lang, originating from another alternate timeline appears and the events of Endgame occur as per normal, albeit with an alternate Scott Lang. Or, the Endgame that we watched exists in a pre-existing alternate timeline and the Scott Lang that emerged from the Quantum Tunnel is actually the original Ant-Man from our MCU, meaning Iron Man could still be well and alive in the Scott Lang-less OG timeline.

Another argument against could be the possibility that Ant-Man's emergence after 5 years was an accident and merely inspiration for the time machine that Tony Stark created. However, it is shown that in the "level" of the Quantum Realm that Ant-Man was trapped in, the amount of time that occurred in the Quantum Realm, did equate to the amount of time that occurred in real life, as Scott was able to speak to Hank and Janet through the radio in real time. Which means whatever the rat did to the control panel in Endgame, although crudely, did really pull Scott from time 5 hours after he entered.

A flaw with this theory is that we aren't exactly sure how the timelines are affected by travelling to the future in the MCU as we have only seen time travelling to the past, but as this has not been explored yet in the MCU, the possibility of the original timeline still existing, with an alive Tony Stark, still exists.

09 replies
Helpful
Not helpful
View Source
9 replies
DarthEdgeman · 4 years ago

Well there is absolutely a universe/timeline where Thanos leaves in 2014 and is killed in the main universe so he never becomes a threat and where Tony and Captain America may never resolve their issues.

1 upvotes on reddit
F
Feynmanrenders · 4 years ago

a bit late but - exactly!

1 upvotes on reddit
ElInterprete2000 · 4 years ago

Your explanation makes a lot of sense but leads to an even more grim possibility.

If none of the Avengers went back in time, then didn't Thanos win? Didn't he destroy all life in the universe?

0 upvotes on reddit
P
Poopin_the_turd · 4 years ago

Scott's arrival in 2023 wasn't time travel it was more like time dilation. He was so deep in the Quantum Realm that he was experiencing time differently than everyone else in the surface world. He didn't travel through time he was experiencing every year as an hour. So he wouldn't have caused any sort of time branch seeing as he wasn't messing with time rather time, via quantum physics, was messing with him. This was all clearly explained in the film.

12 upvotes on reddit
3
3personal5me · 4 years ago

In other words, it was closer to being frozen like Cap.

3 upvotes on reddit
M
mechano010 · 4 years ago

According to hulk's explanation, the timeline branch only occurs if you travel to the past. Scott travelled to the future.

5 upvotes on reddit
P
Poopin_the_turd · 4 years ago

He didn't travel at all he was experiencing time differently than the rest of the world because he was so deep in the Quantum Realm. He clearly says this in the film it's a major plot point.

4 upvotes on reddit
M
mechano010 · 4 years ago

That's basically future time travel, he just couldn't navigate because he didn't have the gear.

3 upvotes on reddit
J
Japjer · 4 years ago

You're getting engrossed in the comic shenanigans and forgetting this is a movie.

Tony's death was a pivotal moment for him. It was a literal sacrificial death and a symbolic ending of the current MCU arc.

Underlying issues with your proposal here, it'd be an absolute slap in the face to all fans

6 upvotes on reddit
See 9 replies

Top People to Talk to

These are some of the top contributors related to
PowerScalingHub
Endgame
ironman
3+ others
B

Bueno117

No bio available
48884
Karma
78
Posts
510
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
L

lioneye9

No bio available
3704
Karma
9
Posts
604
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
C

chris0castro

No bio available
4665
Karma
34
Posts
3492
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
C

confusedporg

No bio available
66954
Karma
140
Posts
10000
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
S

spider-venomized

No bio available
253046
Karma
639
Posts
10000
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
S

scuderia91

No bio available
147780
Karma
747
Posts
10000
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
R

rocketinspace

No bio available
162934
Karma
4283
Posts
4580
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI
K

Kriositeetti

No bio available
3005
Karma
94
Posts
1403
Comments
View Profile
Chat w/ Profile AI

Related

Did Tony Stark really die in Avengers Endgame

How did Tony Stark die in Avengers Endgame

Will Tony Stark return in future Marvel movies

AI Answer

🤖

What happens to Iron Man after Endgame

Key Considerations:

  1. Character Arc Closure: In "Avengers: Endgame," Tony Stark (Iron Man) sacrifices himself to defeat Thanos, marking a significant end to his character arc that began in 2008 with "Iron Man." His sacrifice symbolizes his growth from a self-centered billionaire to a selfless hero.

  2. Legacy: After his death, Tony Stark's legacy continues through various characters, particularly his daughter Morgan Stark, who represents the future of the Stark lineage. His technology and ideals also influence other characters, such as Peter Parker (Spider-Man).

  3. Impact on the Avengers: Tony's absence leaves a void in the Avengers team, prompting other characters to step up and take on leadership roles. This shift sets the stage for new dynamics and storylines in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

  4. Future of Iron Man: While Tony Stark's character is concluded in the main MCU timeline, there are possibilities for his return through alternate timelines, multiverse scenarios, or flashbacks in future projects.

Takeaway: Tony Stark's death in "Endgame" serves as a poignant conclusion to his journey, emphasizing themes of sacrifice and legacy. His influence will likely continue to resonate in future MCU narratives, shaping the direction of new heroes and stories.

Still looking for a better answer?

Get more comprehensive results summarized by our most cutting edge AI model. Plus deep Youtube search.

Try Gigabrain Pro for Free
gigaGigaBrain Logo
Support

Who are we?

Get API access

Leave us feedback

Contact us

Legal

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Shopping Tools

Product Comparisons

2023 GigaBrain Corporation
As an Amazon Associate, GigaBrain may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.